2
Inferences and Fallacies Inferences
The terms "valid inference" and "warranted inference" refer to the same thing in both
their definitions and their conceptualizations: What exactly do we mean when we say, "valid
inference"? The statement "drawing a wrong inference from facts before presenting it as fact"
accurately describes the action of reaching a judgment that is not supported by the data. As
defined by Shwartz (2020), a "warranted inference" refers to an argument where the proposer
claims that the finding achieved is very probable or near to the truth, despite the fact that it might
be true or untrue. The process of drawing such an inference is called "warranting" the
conclusion. Because "to prove" is one of the definitions of deductive reasoning, it implies that
the concept of valid inference is likewise relatively close to that of deductive reasoning. As a
result, having a grasp of what constitutes a valid inference will be advantageous in a variety of
settings. If someone is exceptionally good at dancing, and another person watches them and
thinks, "Wow, he's just dancing like Michael Jackson!" then that person is dancing like Michael
Jackson.
An inductive argument serves the same aim that a justified inference does, which is to
increase the likelihood of reaching a certain conclusion. One will have a better understanding of
the many different kinds of inductive reasoning if they have a firm grip on the idea of justified
inference (Hayes & Heit, 2018). For instance, one may interpret a girl's angry knocking on the
door as an indication of her displeasure with the situation. Regardless of whether or not her anger
is warranted by the situation.
Fallacies
