Module 3 Paper JBane

.docx

School

Liberty University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

100

Subject

Philosophy

Date

Feb 20, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

Uploaded by BaronHarePerson95

Jackson Bane 1/23/24 Apologetics Analyzing Arguments Using the Three A's Forming and debating arguments are made simpler when the "Three A's" method is used. Assumptions, arguments, and authorities make up the three A's. A claim that someone makes in a discussion or argument without stating it is called an assumption. When two people argue, one of them typically "smuggles" in the other's assumptions. These claims are typically denied. however, It is crucial that you are aware of the assumptions you are making before jumping into an argument. Make an effort to ensure that the people in your audience will agree with what you have to say. If they come under investigation, you ought to stand up for them. You need to learn how to spot hidden assumptions in arguments before you can study and create them better. There are 5 key elements of assumptions. The first is that assumptions are present within all arguments. They are essential in fact. The second is that assumptions can be good, bad, true or untrue. The third is that assumptions are typically not stated verbally. They are implied. The fourth is that assumptions are smuggled into arguments. And the last is that assumptions are statements or concepts assumed to be true. The person who is arguing normally does not attempt to justify his or her assumptions, but the person who is listening to the argument can. The "Three A's" method emphasizes the argument. Although they aren't always opinion- based, they can be a great tool for seeing any problems in someone else's argument. Before going

into an investigation of a case, it is important to ask yourself what is being presented. This will enable you to determine the extent of the argument. Once you have identified the main points of the argument, it's time to start asking yourself questions about the other side's assertions. One of the most common reasons why people tend to tear down an argument is due to its lack of logic. The second phase is to search for fallacies. Ad hominem is one of them, when the focus is on the other person arguing rather than the content of the argument. Another method is the appeal to ignorance, which is a claim made because it hasn't been disproved. Circular reasoning is a different kind of fallacy that happens when an argument is based on a premise that has no evidence to back it up. A false dilemma occurs when a disagreement limits the users' options. Authorities is the final "A" in the "Three A's". In any argument, there is always someone or something where one can turn for support or insight. Authorities are objects or people brought up in order to settle an argument. To solve the conflict, everyone makes an appeal to a higher authority. You should consider the following queries for yourself: To what authority is this appeal made? Does the authority have their facts straight? Is the source of authority reliable? And do all authorities of comparable status agree? One of the keys to identifying authorities in arguments is being aware of many different kinds of potential authorities ahead of time. Some common authorities include the media, God, science, firsthand knowledge, and research. Make sure the source has the required credentials and is reliable, consistent, and trustworthy when determining whether or not it has been cited as trustworthy Being informed is important since it can prevent the debate from dragging on. Also, it is key to find out whether the authority has conducted any research or published any books or articles. The argument may be weak if the authority being cited is prejudiced. Before moving

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help