PHI2630 Short Writing Assignment 1

.docx

School

University of Florida *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

2630

Subject

Philosophy

Date

Feb 20, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

2

Uploaded by ecandia1030

Emily Candia 29 January 2024 PHI2630 Short Writing Assignment #1 A complex moral issue that can be explored is the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in warfare. The development and deployment of autonomous weapons systems raise questions about the ethical implications and the potential consequences of these technologies. From a consequentialist perspective, such as utilitarianism, the morality of using AI in warfare would be evaluated based on the overall consequences or outcomes it produces. A consequentialist would consider the potential benefits, such as reduced human casualties and more efficient military operations, as well as the potential harms, such as the loss of human control, unintended civilian casualties, or the escalation of conflicts. The consequentialist would weigh these consequences and make a moral judgment based on the balance of overall utility. If the benefits outweigh the harms, then the use of AI in warfare could be considered morally justified. On the other hand, a deontologist would approach the morality of using AI in warfare from a different perspective. Deontological ethics, like Immanuel Kant's categorical imperative, focuses on the inherent moral duty and the principles that should guide our actions. A deontologist would consider whether using autonomous weapons systems violates any fundamental moral principles or universal rules. For example, a deontologist might argue that deploying AI in warfare is inherently wrong because it fails to treat individuals with dignity and respect, as it removes human agency and responsibility from the decision-making process. The deontologist would prioritize the adherence to moral principles, regardless of the consequences that may arise. Both perspectives highlight different aspects of the moral issue. Consequentialism emphasizes the evaluation of outcomes and the principle of utility, considering the overall consequences of using AI in warfare. Deontological ethics, on the other hand, focuses on moral duties and obligations, considering the inherent principles and the categorical imperative. It's important to note that this is just one example of how consequentialists and deontologists might think about the morality of using AI in warfare. Different individuals within each ethical framework may have varying interpretations and arguments regarding this complex issue.
References Anthony Weston. (2018). A Rulebook for Arguments (5th ed.). Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing. “Militarization of AI Has Severe Implications for Global Security and Warfare.” United Nations University , unu.edu/article/militarization-ai-has-severe-implications-global-security-and- warfare. Accessed 29 Jan. 2024. Rogin, Ali, and Harry Zahn. “How Militaries Are Using Artificial Intelligence on and off the Battlefield.” PBS , Public Broadcasting Service, 9 July 2023, www.pbs.org/newshour/show/how-militaries-are-using-artificial-intelligence-on-and-off- the-battlefield. Shafer-Landau, R. (2020). Fundamentals of Ethics (5th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help