Unit VII assessment
.docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Waldorf College *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
1020
Subject
Philosophy
Date
Dec 6, 2023
Type
docx
Pages
3
Uploaded by csimmons2002
Question 1
1.
Match the three types of fallacies Chaffee discusses in this chapter
with their definitions.
fallacies of
relevance
fallacies of
false
generalizat
ion
causal
fallacies
A
.
Arguments supported by factors
that have nothing to do with the
argument.
B
.
Concluding an event is the result
of another event.
C
.
Offering a possible explanation
that needs further investigation.
D
.
Forming a broad conclusion from a
small sample.
30 points
Question 2
1.
Match the three types of fallacies Chaffee discusses in this chapter
with their examples.
Fallacies of
False
Generalizatio
n
Causal
Fallacies
Fallacies of
Relevance
A
.
"It’s OK for me to take this printer
cartridge from the office for my
home printer. They don’t pay me
enough anyway."
B
.
"Break a mirror and get 7 years of
bad luck."
C
.
"My neighbor’s teenage son just got
arrested for shoplifting. Teenage
boys are all just hoodlums."
30 points
Question 3
1.
If you are using the Scientific Method (or some other type of causal
reasoning), what do you do when your evidence does not support your
hypothesis?
Change your hypothesis to match the results.
Keep looking for more evidence until you find something that will
support your hypothesis.
Begin the entire process again by identifying and testing a new
hypothesis.
Ask others to help you find better evidence.
4 points
Question 4
1.
Where does Chaffee’s “Critical Thinkers Guide to Reasoning” start the
process?
A.
D.
B.
C.
B.
A.
Point of View
Personal
assumptions
Prediction of
outcome
Others’
viewpoints
4 points
Question 5
1.
Why does the text include looking at multiple points of view in its
“Critical Thinkers Guide to Reasoning”?
It allows us to think empathetically
If we don’t look at other views, our own views will be
severely limited.
It allows us a deeper understanding of life’s complexities
All of the above
None of the above
A and C
4 points
Question 6
1.
Why does Chaffee say that understanding how to evaluate inductive
reasoning important?
Because it allows us to estimate the risks involved in decision making.
Because we are continually challenged to construct and evaluate
inductive reasoning in our lives.
Because it allows us to construct better arguments.
Because it forces us to form a hypothesis.
4 points
Question 7
1.
What does Chaffee state are the criteria for evaluating inductive
argument? Choose ALL that apply.
Is the sample
sufficient?
Is the sample
different?
Is the sample known?
Is the sample trusted?
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help