Unit VII assessment

.docx

School

Waldorf College *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

1020

Subject

Philosophy

Date

Dec 6, 2023

Type

docx

Pages

3

Uploaded by csimmons2002

Report
Question 1 1. Match the three types of fallacies Chaffee discusses in this chapter with their definitions. fallacies of relevance fallacies of false generalizat ion causal fallacies A . Arguments supported by factors that have nothing to do with the argument. B . Concluding an event is the result of another event. C . Offering a possible explanation that needs further investigation. D . Forming a broad conclusion from a small sample. 30 points Question 2 1. Match the three types of fallacies Chaffee discusses in this chapter with their examples. Fallacies of False Generalizatio n Causal Fallacies Fallacies of Relevance A . "It’s OK for me to take this printer cartridge from the office for my home printer. They don’t pay me enough anyway." B . "Break a mirror and get 7 years of bad luck." C . "My neighbor’s teenage son just got arrested for shoplifting. Teenage boys are all just hoodlums." 30 points Question 3 1. If you are using the Scientific Method (or some other type of causal reasoning), what do you do when your evidence does not support your hypothesis? Change your hypothesis to match the results. Keep looking for more evidence until you find something that will support your hypothesis. Begin the entire process again by identifying and testing a new hypothesis. Ask others to help you find better evidence. 4 points Question 4 1. Where does Chaffee’s “Critical Thinkers Guide to Reasoning” start the process? A. D. B. C. B. A.
Point of View Personal assumptions Prediction of outcome Others’ viewpoints 4 points Question 5 1. Why does the text include looking at multiple points of view in its “Critical Thinkers Guide to Reasoning”? It allows us to think empathetically If we don’t look at other views, our own views will be severely limited. It allows us a deeper understanding of life’s complexities All of the above None of the above A and C 4 points Question 6 1. Why does Chaffee say that understanding how to evaluate inductive reasoning important? Because it allows us to estimate the risks involved in decision making. Because we are continually challenged to construct and evaluate inductive reasoning in our lives. Because it allows us to construct better arguments. Because it forces us to form a hypothesis. 4 points Question 7 1. What does Chaffee state are the criteria for evaluating inductive argument? Choose ALL that apply. Is the sample sufficient? Is the sample different? Is the sample known? Is the sample trusted?
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help