Untitled document (34)

.docx

School

Indian River State College *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

1045

Subject

Philosophy

Date

Apr 3, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

8

Uploaded by neisy2831

Rubric for Written Assignment Drug Brochure Poor Satisfactory Good Excellent Score Clarity of Introduction Points: 2 (2%) Introduction - Student does not introduce the topic or tell the reader what to expect. Points: 3 (3%) Introduction - Student somewhat introduces the topic or tells the reader what to expect. Points: 4 (4%) Introduction - Student introduces the topic and tells the reader what to expect. Points: 5 (5%) Introduction - Student thoroughly introduces the topic and tells the reader what to expect. Application of Theory Points: 4 (4%) Accuracy - Student does not accurately apply theory and/or research to the topic. Points: 8 (8%) Accuracy - Student applies theory and/or research to the topic. Points: 11 (11%) Accuracy - Student accurately applies theory and/or research to the topic. Points: 15 (15%)
Accuracy - Student thoroughly and accurately applies theory and/or research to the topic. Application of Theory Points: 2 (2%) Relevance - Student does not focus discussion directly on topic content. Points:3 (3%) Relevance - Student focuses discussion somewhat on topic content. Points: 4 (4%) Relevance - Student focuses discussion on topic content. Points: 5 (5%) Relevance - Student focuses discussion directly on topic content. Application of Theory Points: 4 (4%) Resources – Student does not use peer reviewed and/or scholarly resources. Points: 6 (6%) Resources – Student somewhat uses peer reviewed and/or scholarly resources. Points: 8 (8%) Resources – Student mostly uses peer reviewed and/or scholarly resources. Points: 10 (10%) Resources – Student consistently uses peer reviewed and/or scholarly resources. Critical and Creative Thinking Points: 12 (12%)
Critical Thinking - Student does not apply higher-level thinking skills (e.g., evaluates and analyzes) prior to making recommendations. *Include one item besides the names Points: 18 (18%) Critical Thinking - Student applies higher-level thinking skills, somewhat (e.g., evaluates and analyzes) prior to making recommendations. *Include 2-3 of these items Points: 24 (24%) Critical Thinking - Student applies higher-level thinking skills (e.g., evaluates and analyzes) for the most part, prior to making recommendations . * Include 4-5 of these items Points:30(30%) Critical Thinking - Student applies higher-level thinking skills (e.g., evaluates and analyzes) prior to making recommendations. Information included *names (brand and generic), *action, *side effects, *dietary restrictions, *contraindications,
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help