Chapter 1 Assignment __ ____Jackson Acres

.docx

School

Purdue University, Fort Wayne *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

30000

Subject

Philosophy

Date

Apr 3, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

2

Uploaded by DoctorClover3478

Report
Chapter 1 Assignment Jackson Acres Instructions – Read the chapter. Be clear and concise in your answer 1.) Emotivism in Ethics: Moral statements, according to emotivism, are reflections of human feelings rather than objective realities. For example, saying "Murder is wrong" is expressing an emotional dislike of murder rather than conveying a fact. This view denies the existence of objective moral truths, arguing that moral judgements are subjective and vary from person to person. Hume's Naturalistic Fallacy: Hume's naturalistic fallacy advises us not to base moral judgements only on what we perceive in the natural world. It highlights that simply because something is a specific way in nature (the "is" statement) does not logically determine how it should be morally (the "ought" statement). This gap between factual observations and moral values emphasizes the difficulty of drawing objective moral truths only from empirical facts, as well as the necessity to explore moral reasoning beyond what is seen in nature. 2.) “Ethics, or moral philosophy, asks basic questions about the good life, about what is better and worse, about whether there is any objective right and wrong, and how we know it if there is” The detailed and complex world of moral philosophy and ethics, which is concerned with how we make moral decisions and judgments in our daily lives. I like this quote because it makes you think about what's good and bad in life, whether there are definite right and wrong, and how we figure out what they are. These are questions that make you think deeply. 3.) Hume's difficulty in determining a "ought" from a "is" stems from the distinction he makes between statements that describe facts ("is" statements) and those that impose moral standards ("ought" statements). He contends that factual observations about the universe cannot logically lead to moral judgments since facts about how things are do not always reflect how they should be ethically. The Hume's Guillotine challenge emphasizes the difficulties of drawing objective moral truths merely from empirical facts, highlighting the importance of moral reasoning and subjective factors in ethical judgements. 4.) How can ethical arguments and moral changes take place under emotivism, when moral judgements are seen human emotions?
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help