ENV 250 Module One Homework (3)
.docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Southern New Hampshire University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
250
Subject
Philosophy
Date
Apr 3, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
2
Uploaded by AmbassadorMetal11473
ENV 250 Module One Homework
Instructions:
For this assignment, you will construct hypotheses based on a given observation
and determine if a given scenario is using deductive or inductive reasoning. For each problem
below, please address the prompt and explain your reasoning.
1.
Kelly has two ponds on her farm. Around one pond, she sprayed diazinon, a common
pesticide, to get rid of ants. A week later she noticed that the tadpoles in the pond she sprayed
diazinon around appear smaller in size than the tadpoles in the other pond where she did not
spray. Using the scenario above, write a specific, testable research hypothesis and null
hypothesis for Kelly’s observation. Justify your reasoning. Kelly's theory states that tadpoles in one pond will grow more slowly than those in
the control pond if she sprays diazinon around it. I think that Kelly can track development
in both ponds over time, making this idea testable. Tadpoles in both ponds should develop
at the same pace if she keeps spraying diazinon, according to the null hypothesis. This
configuration makes it possible to compare and test the idea.
2.
Dr. Ramirez noted that many of his patients with lung cancer all work in the same coal mine.
He wonders if chronic exposure to coal dust causes cancer. Write a specific, testable research
hypothesis and null hypothesis for Dr. Ramirez’s question. Justify your reasoning. There may be a connection between long-term coal dust exposure and lung cancer,
based on Dr. Ramirez's observations of lung cancer patients who worked in coal mines.
According to the research premise, miners are more likely to develop lung cancer if they
are exposed to coal dust. The null hypothesis, on the other hand, indicates no link. The
research hypothesis is founded on a clinical observation made by Dr. Ramirez. To ascertain
the statistical significance of the link, a systematic investigation comparing the incidence of
lung cancer in coal miners with a control group would be conducted. The results would be
strengthened by a carefully planned study that accounts for confounding variables.
3.
Jackie observed that most of the houses in her neighborhood did not set out recycling cans on
trash pick-up day. She wondered if the lack of participation was due to apathy and decided to
conduct a formal survey. Write a specific, testable research hypothesis and null hypothesis for
Jackie’s observation. Justify your reasoning. According to Jackie's research hypothesis, I don’t think that is much of a
connection between environmental consciousness and recycling can behavior. The null
hypothesis makes no assumptions about a relationship. Low recycling rates in Jackie's
neighborhood raise the possibility that people's actions are motivated by a lack of
environmental awareness. You would have to investigate theories that might yield
information about recycling habits and environmental awareness, which might influence
recycling initiatives and laws meant to encourage people to participate in environmental
conservation.
4.
All ducks fly south for the winter. A mallard is a type of duck. Therefore, mallards fly south
for the winter. What type of logic is represented in the duck scenario? What is the main caveat
for this type of logic? Justify your reasoning. Inductive reasoning is utilized to draw the conclusion that mallards likewise go
south for the winter. This line of reasoning starts with observations or patterns and works
its way out to more general conclusions. But the conclusions drawn by inductive reasoning
are not always certain. It gives substantial evidence to back up a claim, but it is not proof
positive. Not all ducks, including mallards, will necessarily go south for the winter.
5.
Chinook, Coho, and sockeye salmon return to the stream where they were hatched to spawn.
Therefore, all salmon return to the stream where they were hatched to spawn. What type of logic
is represented in the salmon scenario? What is the main caveat for this type of logic? Justify your
reasoning. When drawing generalizations from certain observations or pieces of evidence,
inductive reasoning is the logic that's applied in many circumstances. All salmon, for
instance, are thought to return to their birthplace based on the observation of Chinook,
Coho, and sockeye salmon returning there to spawn. Since it depends on the facts at hand
and might not always be accurate, inductive reasoning does not, however, provide
certainty. Thus, it does not provide absolute assurance, even though it can be a useful tool
for forecasts and hypotheses.
References
Li, L., Jiang, M., Li, X., & Zhou, B. (2021). Association between Coalmine Dust and Mortality Risk of Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.
BioMed research international
,
2021
, 6624799. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6624799
Ducks in your pool. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. (2024, March 1). Ducks in you pool and Nesting in your Yard.
FWS.gov. Retrieved from: https://www.fws.gov/story/ducks-your-
pool#:~:text=Migration,spring%20migration%20begins%20in%20March
.
Fisheries, N. (n.d.).
Salmon life cycle and seasonal fishery planning
. NOAA.
https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/west-coast/sustainable-fisheries/salmon-life-cycle-and-
seasonal-fishery-planning#:~:text=Salmon%20and%20steelhead%20can%20return,streams
%20where%20they%20were%20born
).
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help