Case analysis 9

.pdf

School

University Of Arizona *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

322

Subject

Philosophy

Date

Jan 9, 2024

Type

pdf

Pages

3

Uploaded by GrandCrown9690

Report
Chanel Peykar Case Analysis 9.2 September 23, 2023 Changing Jobs and Loyalties In Case 9.2, we explore a scenario in which Cynthia, a business executive, is debating her loyalty to her old company as she transitions to a new one. Her decision to leave immediately would raise problems for her employer, as she’s leading a large project. Alternately, leading would cost her a better position at a company she feels she’d be happier working for. I will be arguing employees do not owe loyalty to their employers, and so there is nothing unethical about moving companies immediately. Loyalty is a feeling of support and allegiance, commonly in reference to two people or between a person and a group of people. It must be acknowledged that a business is different from just a group of people in that it works to achieve a specific goal (profit) and that working, for most people, is a mandatory part of life. People show up to make an income, not because they necessarily share values and care about their coworkers welfare. Naturally, a company is a vessel that treats people as a means. It would be naive for an employee to treat their company with loyalty when it doesn’t have the capacity to reciprocate loyalty itself. An ethical, or loyal, person may have a proclivity for treating their company with the same loyalty they have in personal relationships, but equating the two can be dangerous. Anyone
arguing that employees owe loyalty to their employers would be stripping people of their rights and the ability to self advocate in the workplace.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help