BUSN410 MIDTERM
.pdf
keyboard_arrow_up
School
American Military University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
410
Subject
Philosophy
Date
Jan 9, 2024
Type
Pages
1
Uploaded by SuperHumanLobster3874
Midterm - Results
Attempt 1 of 1
Written Dec 20, 2023 3:34 PM - Dec 20, 2023 3:56 PM
Attempt Score
100 / 100 - 100 %
Overall Grade (Highest Attempt)
100 / 100 - 100 %
Question 1
5 / 5 points
Critical thinkers possess the following characteristics except
Question 2
5 / 5 points
Reason is
Question 3
5 / 5 points
Critical thinking is
Question 4
5 / 5 points
Lack of critical thinking
Question 5
5 / 5 points
Dualism is
Question 6
5 / 5 points
Relativism is
Question 7
5 / 5 points
Dimensions of critical thinking include all but
Question 8
5 / 5 points
Fideism states
Question 9
5 / 5 points
Critical rationalism
Question 10
5 / 5 points
Directive language
Question 11
5 / 5 points
Expressive language
Question 12
5 / 5 points
Ceremonial language
Question 13
5 / 5 points
Denotative meanings
Question 14
5 / 5 points
Connotative meanings
Question 15
5 / 5 points
Critical thinkers are not only assertive communicators
Question 16
5 / 5 points
Emotive language
Question 17
5 / 5 points
Direct experience
Question 18
5 / 5 points
The us-and-them error
Question 19
5 / 5 points
An argument
Question 20
5 / 5 points
Fallacy is
Done
analytical skills
communication skills
intolerance of ambiguity
curiosity
the process of supporting a claim based on evidence
emotionally charged thinking
not the process of applying logic
not a process to a conclusion
the same as creative thinking
the ability to consider long-term consequences and make decisions that enhance our development
emotionally charged thinking
not essential to effective learning and productive living
has no influence on decisions
leads to more creative thinking
leads to open-minded skepticism
may result in wrong career choices, and other poor decisions
perceived as disrespectful and judgmental, and they expect their opinions to be supported
where one believes in relativity and context, and no absolute right and wrong.
a simplistic way of thinking characterized by a black-and-white, right-and-wrong style of logic
a matter of opinion, to which everyone has a right
not matter of opinion, to which everyone has a right
a simplistic way of thinking characterized by a black-and-white, right-and-wrong style of logic
a struggle to apply critical thinking to real-life conflicts
where one believes in relativity and context, and no absolute right and wrong
experience
interpretation
indulgence
analysis
faith is beyond what empirical evidence and reason can prove
rejects that religious arguments do not need to be proven
the divine cannot be revealed only through revelation and faith
the compatibility of faith and reason
argues for the compatibility of faith and reason
does not accept that faith occurs from direct revelation of God
accepts that religious arguments do not need to be proven through worldly reason and evidence
faith is beyond what empirical evidence and reason can prove
functions to influence or direct others
is the dictionary definition of words
reflects the colloquialisms
has no relationship to critical thinking
is the same as the dictionary definition of a word
expresses attitudes and feelings to generate an emotional impact. Emotive words elicit emotional
reactions
is prescribed in specific situations
expresses associations based on personal thoughts and feeling
is the same as the dictionary definition of a word
expresses attitudes and feelings to generate an emotional impact
expresses associations based on personal thoughts
is prescribed in specific situations
the same as the dictionary definition of a word
is prescribed in specific situations
expresses associations based on personal thoughts and feelings
expresses attitudes and feelings to generate an emotional impact
are prescribed in specific situations
are the same as the dictionary definition of a word
express associations based on personal thoughts and feelings
is evidence supporting assumptions
they only consider short-term consequences
they accurately interpret others' communication
they annoy others with their assertiveness
they are unable to build relationships
like to prove others wrong
is commonly used in controversial issues in politics, religion and morality
is not used to influence others
relies on facts to persuade others
is not infallible since our brains interpret rather than record observations
studies have shown that we are not suggestible
studies show we tend to recall events accurately
words do not have the power to alter memories
is dualistic thinking
is not characteristic of the simplest level of cognitive development
does not lead one group to believe they have the monopoly on truth
is a self-fulfilling prophecy
means no one wins
is the use of propositions to support a point of view using reasoning
is the same as a fallacy of logic
is at the heart of miscommunication
a creative way to address disagreements
is voodoo science
not relevant to critical thinkers
an argument that appears to be correct but is found to be incorrect when investigated further due to
faulty reasoning
Discover more documents: Sign up today!
Unlock a world of knowledge! Explore tailored content for a richer learning experience. Here's what you'll get:
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help