BUSN410 MIDTERM

.pdf

School

American Military University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

410

Subject

Philosophy

Date

Jan 9, 2024

Type

pdf

Pages

1

Uploaded by SuperHumanLobster3874

Midterm - Results Attempt 1 of 1 Written Dec 20, 2023 3:34 PM - Dec 20, 2023 3:56 PM Attempt Score 100 / 100 - 100 % Overall Grade (Highest Attempt) 100 / 100 - 100 % Question 1 5 / 5 points Critical thinkers possess the following characteristics except Question 2 5 / 5 points Reason is Question 3 5 / 5 points Critical thinking is Question 4 5 / 5 points Lack of critical thinking Question 5 5 / 5 points Dualism is Question 6 5 / 5 points Relativism is Question 7 5 / 5 points Dimensions of critical thinking include all but Question 8 5 / 5 points Fideism states Question 9 5 / 5 points Critical rationalism Question 10 5 / 5 points Directive language Question 11 5 / 5 points Expressive language Question 12 5 / 5 points Ceremonial language Question 13 5 / 5 points Denotative meanings Question 14 5 / 5 points Connotative meanings Question 15 5 / 5 points Critical thinkers are not only assertive communicators Question 16 5 / 5 points Emotive language Question 17 5 / 5 points Direct experience Question 18 5 / 5 points The us-and-them error Question 19 5 / 5 points An argument Question 20 5 / 5 points Fallacy is Done analytical skills communication skills intolerance of ambiguity curiosity the process of supporting a claim based on evidence emotionally charged thinking not the process of applying logic not a process to a conclusion the same as creative thinking the ability to consider long-term consequences and make decisions that enhance our development emotionally charged thinking not essential to effective learning and productive living has no influence on decisions leads to more creative thinking leads to open-minded skepticism may result in wrong career choices, and other poor decisions perceived as disrespectful and judgmental, and they expect their opinions to be supported where one believes in relativity and context, and no absolute right and wrong. a simplistic way of thinking characterized by a black-and-white, right-and-wrong style of logic a matter of opinion, to which everyone has a right not matter of opinion, to which everyone has a right a simplistic way of thinking characterized by a black-and-white, right-and-wrong style of logic a struggle to apply critical thinking to real-life conflicts where one believes in relativity and context, and no absolute right and wrong experience interpretation indulgence analysis faith is beyond what empirical evidence and reason can prove rejects that religious arguments do not need to be proven the divine cannot be revealed only through revelation and faith the compatibility of faith and reason argues for the compatibility of faith and reason does not accept that faith occurs from direct revelation of God accepts that religious arguments do not need to be proven through worldly reason and evidence faith is beyond what empirical evidence and reason can prove functions to influence or direct others is the dictionary definition of words reflects the colloquialisms has no relationship to critical thinking is the same as the dictionary definition of a word expresses attitudes and feelings to generate an emotional impact. Emotive words elicit emotional reactions is prescribed in specific situations expresses associations based on personal thoughts and feeling is the same as the dictionary definition of a word expresses attitudes and feelings to generate an emotional impact expresses associations based on personal thoughts is prescribed in specific situations the same as the dictionary definition of a word is prescribed in specific situations expresses associations based on personal thoughts and feelings expresses attitudes and feelings to generate an emotional impact are prescribed in specific situations are the same as the dictionary definition of a word express associations based on personal thoughts and feelings is evidence supporting assumptions they only consider short-term consequences they accurately interpret others' communication they annoy others with their assertiveness they are unable to build relationships like to prove others wrong is commonly used in controversial issues in politics, religion and morality is not used to influence others relies on facts to persuade others is not infallible since our brains interpret rather than record observations studies have shown that we are not suggestible studies show we tend to recall events accurately words do not have the power to alter memories is dualistic thinking is not characteristic of the simplest level of cognitive development does not lead one group to believe they have the monopoly on truth is a self-fulfilling prophecy means no one wins is the use of propositions to support a point of view using reasoning is the same as a fallacy of logic is at the heart of miscommunication a creative way to address disagreements is voodoo science not relevant to critical thinkers an argument that appears to be correct but is found to be incorrect when investigated further due to faulty reasoning
Discover more documents: Sign up today!
Unlock a world of knowledge! Explore tailored content for a richer learning experience. Here's what you'll get:
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help