EDLC 530 - Discussion- State Testing
.docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Reinhardt University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
530
Subject
Philosophy
Date
Jan 9, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
2
Uploaded by clpeyton81
Discussion: Pressures of State Testing
EDLC 530
In my area, Northwest Georgia, the teachers are responding to the pressures of state testing
programs in a variety of ways. Some teachers are incorporating more test preparation into their
curriculum, dedicating extra time to review test-taking strategies, and practicing sample
questions. Others are focusing on aligning their instruction with the state standards and
curriculum frameworks to ensure that students are adequately prepared for the content of the
tests. Additionally, some schools are implementing interventions and support programs for
students who may be struggling with test anxiety or learning loss.
Whether what the teachers are doing is in the best interest of students is a complex question.
On one hand, it can be argued that test preparation helps students become familiar with the
format and content of the exams, potentially boosting their confidence and performance. It also
ensures that students are exposed to the material that will be assessed, which can be seen as a
positive outcome.
However, there are concerns that excessive focus on test preparation may lead to a narrowing
of the curriculum, with teachers feeling pressured to teach to the test at the expense of other
important skills and knowledge (Hatcher, 2020). This can limit students' opportunities for
creativity, critical thinking, and problem-solving, which are essential for their overall
development. Additionally, high-stakes testing can contribute to increased stress and anxiety
among students, potentially negatively impacting their well-being and overall learning
experience.
In terms of raising scores, it is important to consider that test scores are just one measure of
student achievement. While test preparation may lead to short-term score improvements, it
may not necessarily result in long-term academic growth or a well-rounded education (Hatcher,
2020). It is crucial to strike a balance between preparing students for assessments and providing
them with a comprehensive and engaging learning experience.
To truly raise scores and improve education outcomes, it is important to address the root causes
of the problems facing the education system, such as learning loss, test anxiety, and teacher
attrition. This requires a multi-faceted approach that includes providing adequate support and
resources for teachers, promoting a holistic curriculum that goes beyond test preparation, and
prioritizing the well-being and individual needs of students.
In conclusion, while the actions taken by teachers in response to state testing programs may
have some positive effects, it is essential to critically examine whether they are truly in the best
interest of students. Raising scores should not be the sole focus, but rather a holistic approach
that promotes student well-being, a well-rounded education, and academic growth should be
pursued.
Thank you,
Courtney Peyton
Reference:
Hatcher, A. (2020, November 29).
How standardized testing fails Georgia students and teachers
.
Georgia State Representative Spencer Frye. https://www.spencerfrye.com/how-
standardized-testing-fails-georgia-students-and-teachers/
Reply 1
One principle that can be relevant is the idea of nurturing and developing the gifts and talents
of individuals. In Matthew 25:14-30, the Parable of the Talents, Jesus teaches the importance of
using the abilities and resources given to us wisely and productively. Applying this principle to
education, it can be argued that state testing programs that solely focus on test scores may
neglect the holistic development and unique talents of students.
Another principle is the call to love and care for others. In Matthew 22:39, Jesus commands us
to "love your neighbor as yourself." This can be applied to the concerns raised about the
negative impact of state testing on students and teachers. By advocating for a more student-
centered approach that prioritizes their well-being and holistic growth, we can demonstrate
love and care for our students and fellow educators.
While these scriptures may not directly address state testing programs, they provide principles
that can guide our understanding and approach to education and the well-being of students and
educators.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help