4
.docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Ashworth College *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
J02V
Subject
Philosophy
Date
Jan 9, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
14
Uploaded by KidSandpiper2300
[05] Lessons 4 & 5 Exam - Results
Attempt 1 of 2
Written Dec 5, 2023 9:46 PM - Dec 5, 2023 10:11 PM
Released Dec 9, 2017 10:55 AM
Attempt Score
95 / 100
- 95 %
Overall Grade (Highest Attempt)
95 / 100
- 95 %
Question 1
2.5 / 2.5 points
The entrapment defense is based upon the belief that a person should not be convicted for a crime:
Question options:
in which government officials use violence.
if government officials supply contraband that is readily obtainable.
if government officials are also engaging in criminal enterprise.
that the government instigates.
Question 2
2.5 / 2.5 points
What positions do courts take when it comes to the use of deadly force concerning defense of habitation?
Question options:
Courts are still divided
All courts agree on the use of deadly force regardless of entry
All courts agree on the use of deadly force only if forced entry
All courts agree pursuant to the castle doctrine
Question 3
2.5 / 2.5 points
A person making a citizen's arrest runs the risk of being charged with which of the following?
Question options:
False imprisonment
Unlawful arrest
Kidnapping
Assault and battery
Question 4
2.5 / 2.5 points
Generally speaking, a person is entitled to use __________ force to protect his or her possession of property.
Question options:
deadly
non-deadly
excessive
any
Question 5
2.5 / 2.5 points
__________ defense, available to female victims of domestic violence who kill their partners, is often raised as a declaration of self-defense.
Question options:
Domestic violence
Family violence
Battered woman syndrome
Violence against Women's Act
Question 6
2.5 / 2.5 points
Assume Dylan stole Alex's soccer ball, but almost immediately returned it because he found his own ball. This is an example of __________ defense.
Question options:
de plus refraction
no crimus infraction
de minimus infraction
mens rea infraction
Question 7
2.5 / 2.5 points
Graham v. Connor set the standard that evaluates which of the following?
Question options:
The necessity defense when the threat is less than imminent
Non-deadly use of force by law enforcement
Claims of self-defense when deadly force is involved between two citizens
The consent defense when rape is involved between spouses
Question 8
2.5 / 2.5 points
What does it mean if, during a trial, evidence is introduced that leads the jury to believe that the suspect was temporarily not responsible for his or her actions?
Question options:
The suspect may have been temporarily insane.
The suspect's physical impairment because of the intoxication caused crime.
The suspect may have been temporarily insane due to the consumption of illicit drugs.
The suspect may have been experiencing a seizure.
Question 9
2.5 / 2.5 points
An intoxication defense will not prevail when which of the following crimes has been committed?
Question options:
Any category of murder
General intent crimes
Strict liability crimes
Specific intent crimes
Question 10
2.5 / 2.5 points
Children who were 16 to 17 at the time of their crimes can be tried as:
Question options:
juvenile delinquents only.
status offenders only.
children offenders.
juveniles or adults.
Question 11
0 / 2.5 points
Self-defense is an example of __________ defense.
Question options:
justification
failure of proof
affirmative
necessity
Question 12
2.5 / 2.5 points
What type of defense may a person claim who is kidnapped and forced to participate in a bank robbery?
Question options:
Duress
Necessity
Insanity
Temporary insanity
Question 13
2.5 / 2.5 points
__________ defense is sometimes called the "choice of evils."
Question options:
Consent
Insanity
Justification
Necessity
Question 14
2.5 / 2.5 points
The State v. Corchado case proves which of the following?
Question options:
A "mean smile" should be avoided by both parties
If the initial aggressor withdraws, a claim of self-defense can still be successful
A certain amount of aggression by both the initial aggressor and the initial victim can still result in a successful claim of self-defense
The courts will not tolerate any unwarranted aggression
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help