4

.docx

School

Ashworth College *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

J02V

Subject

Philosophy

Date

Jan 9, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

14

Uploaded by KidSandpiper2300

[05] Lessons 4 & 5 Exam - Results Attempt 1 of 2 Written Dec 5, 2023 9:46 PM - Dec 5, 2023 10:11 PM Released Dec 9, 2017 10:55 AM Attempt Score 95 / 100 - 95 % Overall Grade (Highest Attempt) 95 / 100 - 95 % Question 1 2.5 / 2.5 points The entrapment defense is based upon the belief that a person should not be convicted for a crime: Question options: in which government officials use violence. if government officials supply contraband that is readily obtainable. if government officials are also engaging in criminal enterprise. that the government instigates. Question 2 2.5 / 2.5 points What positions do courts take when it comes to the use of deadly force concerning defense of habitation? Question options:
Courts are still divided All courts agree on the use of deadly force regardless of entry All courts agree on the use of deadly force only if forced entry All courts agree pursuant to the castle doctrine Question 3 2.5 / 2.5 points A person making a citizen's arrest runs the risk of being charged with which of the following? Question options: False imprisonment Unlawful arrest Kidnapping Assault and battery Question 4 2.5 / 2.5 points Generally speaking, a person is entitled to use __________ force to protect his or her possession of property. Question options: deadly non-deadly excessive any Question 5 2.5 / 2.5 points __________ defense, available to female victims of domestic violence who kill their partners, is often raised as a declaration of self-defense. Question options:
Domestic violence Family violence Battered woman syndrome Violence against Women's Act Question 6 2.5 / 2.5 points Assume Dylan stole Alex's soccer ball, but almost immediately returned it because he found his own ball. This is an example of __________ defense. Question options: de plus refraction no crimus infraction de minimus infraction mens rea infraction Question 7 2.5 / 2.5 points Graham v. Connor set the standard that evaluates which of the following? Question options: The necessity defense when the threat is less than imminent Non-deadly use of force by law enforcement Claims of self-defense when deadly force is involved between two citizens The consent defense when rape is involved between spouses Question 8 2.5 / 2.5 points What does it mean if, during a trial, evidence is introduced that leads the jury to believe that the suspect was temporarily not responsible for his or her actions? Question options:
The suspect may have been temporarily insane. The suspect's physical impairment because of the intoxication caused crime. The suspect may have been temporarily insane due to the consumption of illicit drugs. The suspect may have been experiencing a seizure. Question 9 2.5 / 2.5 points An intoxication defense will not prevail when which of the following crimes has been committed? Question options: Any category of murder General intent crimes Strict liability crimes Specific intent crimes Question 10 2.5 / 2.5 points Children who were 16 to 17 at the time of their crimes can be tried as: Question options: juvenile delinquents only. status offenders only. children offenders. juveniles or adults. Question 11 0 / 2.5 points Self-defense is an example of __________ defense. Question options: justification failure of proof
affirmative necessity Question 12 2.5 / 2.5 points What type of defense may a person claim who is kidnapped and forced to participate in a bank robbery? Question options: Duress Necessity Insanity Temporary insanity Question 13 2.5 / 2.5 points __________ defense is sometimes called the "choice of evils." Question options: Consent Insanity Justification Necessity Question 14 2.5 / 2.5 points The State v. Corchado case proves which of the following? Question options: A "mean smile" should be avoided by both parties If the initial aggressor withdraws, a claim of self-defense can still be successful A certain amount of aggression by both the initial aggressor and the initial victim can still result in a successful claim of self-defense The courts will not tolerate any unwarranted aggression
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help