PHIL 202
.docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Florida Gulf Coast University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
2211C
Subject
Philosophy
Date
Jan 9, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
3
Uploaded by cestes172217
Caridad Estes
Professor Bowen
PHIL 202
Final Essay
December 1, 2021
3.
Carebots and other social robots are increasingly playing interactive
roles in our lives. As the design and implementation of carebots
rapidly develops, we will bring them into our homes, hospitals, and
other care facilities to assist in the care for the sick, disabled,
elderly, children, or otherwise vulnerable persons. We will entrust
them with social roles involving companionship and even intimate
caregiving tasks (e.g. bathing, dressing, feeding, turning, medicine
administration, monitoring, or transporting). As the applications for
social robots and their involvement in our lives increases it raises
pressing questions about the ethical implications of human-robot
interactions, as well as the moral status of social robots (cf. Darling
2014: 9-21, Gunkel 2015). Should social robots, and carebots in
particular, be afforded some moral rights and legal protections (e.g.
prohibitions on robot abuse and mistreatment)? Why or why not?
What are the potential problems with granting or denying social
robots some degree of moral standing? How should we establish
limiting factors and determine the extent of protections for social
robots?
(i)Defend a position on the moral status of social
robots with a principled argument
and use detailed examples of
concrete human practices to illustrate the ethical implications of
your principled position;
(ii)
consider how someone might raise
a
compelling
objection that
targets a premise or inference in
your argument (explain the reasoning that supports the
objection)
; and
(iii)
offer a reasonable rejoinder to the objection
by either modifying your position to accommodate the
concern
or
countering the objection with an argument that
neutralizes the force of the objection.
Work in the field of machine medical ethics, especially as it applies to increasingly
autonomous home health care robots, it focuses attention on the capabilities, modes of
implementation, and range of actions of these mechanisms for the sake of respecting the
dignity and right of human patients, (Gunkel, 2015). Caregiving practices can be stressful as well
as exhausting.
In modern society, caregivers are known to be stretched both physically and
emotionally beyond their naturally limited human capacities. The introduction of carebots and
other social robots are increasingly playing an interactive role in our lives. As more designs and
employment of these carebots swiftly develop they will be placed into homes, hospitals, and
other care facilities to work alongside human caregivers in providing care for the sick, disabled,
elderly, children and vulnerable persons. People must learn to trust them with social roles such
as companionship and even intimate tasks like bathing, dressing, feeding, turning, and medicine
administration.
With the application of carebots, it is important to conversate about the ethical
implication of human-robot interactions as well as the moral status of these social robots.
A
social robot is a physically embodied, autonomous agent that communicates and interacts with
humans on a social level. These robots are able to communicate through social cues, display
adaptive learning behavior, and mimic various emotional states (). People are prone to
anthropomorphism which is when humans project their won inherent qualities onto other
entities to make them seem more human-like.
Social robots have a key characteristic and are
specifically designed to stimulate these same projections (). These social robots should be
granted some moral rights and legal protection. There are many instances when this has been
granted, (), mentions an example with military robots. In this example a robot was used to step
on defused landmines which led to the colonel in command to call off the exercise. The reason
for this was because he felt as though it was inhuman and inflicted on their pathos and could
not stand to watch the robot be burned, scarred, and crippled dragging itself on its last leg. This
shows that robots should be treated like humans in the way that if we perceive them as lifelike
things, we shouldn’t be treating them like a device but more as a creature. When a social robot
has the three key factors which are physicality, perceived autonomous movement, and social
behavior it leads to humans treating them more like a human rather than a robot. These
interactions between patient and carebot are important because when there is the teamwork
between a carebot, and human caregiver and it can give the patient that feelings of social as
well as emotional support. Regarding the moral and legal protection of these carebots it is
important to understand the difference between the concept of person and the concept of a
human “being”. In the history of the of not only the United States humans have been known to
define numerous other groups as less than humans.
When comparing this to the moral rights of
carebots it is vital to understand that although they are not human beings, they should be
considered persons and have rights and responsibilities that should be recognized and protect
by both national and international law especially if they are helping us. Consciousness is
something that makes someone or something a person, with the way technology is developing
these carebots have the possibility of developing this consciousness which furthermore proves
why they deserve moral and legal protection.
Some may argue that there are significant issues that revolve around not only social
robots, but the emotional attachment that comes with them.
Many believe that the
development and dissemination of social carebot technology encourages a society that will no
longer be able to differentiate between real and fake which leads to the undermining the values
of authenticity we aim to preserve (). Although this interpretation worries that society may start
seeing robots as real lose that sense of reality it is important to note how exactly these carebots
can help benefit caregivers. In this working world there is a shortage of nurses due to the
overwhelming amount of stress and over time working they experience. With the increased
number of aging adults needing geriatric care that can come with chronic diseases the inclusion
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help