Physics 101 (lab 3) Ivan Branov
.docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
George Mason University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
101
Subject
Physics
Date
Dec 6, 2023
Type
docx
Pages
8
Uploaded by PrivateTeamOpossum39
Physics 101
(General Physics-1)
Laboratory Exercise
(3)
The size of things and use of measurement instruments
Your Name: Ivan Branov
Lab partners name:
Student ID:6468781
Date: 02/08/2022
Introduction:
Physics is a quantitative experimental science and as such is largely a
science of measurement. Over time, instruments of great accuracy have been devolved to
help scientist make better measurements. Common laboratory measurements involve the
determination of the fundamental properties of mass, length, volume density. Most people
are familiar with the use of scales and rulers or meter stick. However, for more accurate and
precise measurements laboratory balance and Vernier calipers or micrometer calipers are
often used for smaller object measurements.
In this lab, the dimensions of various objects will be measured using a meter stick, Vernier
caliper, and micrometer. You will also get a chance to compare the British and metric system
of units. With the use of an electric scale, the mass of some objects will be measured and
from this, the density will be calculated.
Objectives:
The object of this lab is to
(1) Learn how to use these instrument and what advantages they offer.
(2) Learn how to measure small objects using Vernier calipers and micrometer calipers.
(3) How to experimentally determine densities of several materials and
(4) Distinguish between mass and density, and calculate % error between densities of
different materials with the known densities.
Equipment needed:
Laboratory balance, Vernier caliper, Micrometer caliper, Meter stick,
Graduated cylinder, Cylindrical metal rods, Some metal or glass sphere, Short piece of solid
copper wire, Rectangular piece of metal sheets, Irregularly shaped metal objects.
Theory:
Using the proper instrument is extremely important for making accurate
measurements of physical properties. The easiest way to measure length is to use a meter
(or English yard) stick. For normal everyday measurements, a visible comparison between
the object of interest and the scale is all that is needed. To make precise measurements, the
scale must be very accurately made and must be read to a fraction of its smallest scale
division.
When an instrument is used to the limit of its precision, certain errors occur that cannot be
eliminated. These errors are called random errors. When you make a series of
measurements of a physical quantity, the individual results usually differ among
themselves because of the random errors involved. The best value of the quantity measured
is then the average of the values obtained.
The precision of measurements can usually be increased by using more accurate and
complex equipment and by being careful to eliminate errors as much as possible. No matter
what type of instrument you are using, you should always try to make measurements with
the greatest accuracy attainable. Some of the instruments that will be using in this lab for
accurate measurements are (a) electronic balance, (b) Vernier calipers and (c) micrometer
calipers
(a) Different types of Laboratory balance:
Mechanical balance:
are used to balance the weight of an
unknown mass m against that of a known mass m
1
so that
mg=m
1
g or m
1
=m. The mass of the unknown is then read directly
in mass units. The weight W of an object is W=mg (where g=9.8
m/s
2
)
Double beam-double platform balance or equal arm balance:
In this balance a set of
known masses is used to balance an unknown mass
A single platform triple beam balance:
On a triple beam
balance, the riders on the beams are used to balance the
unknown mass on the platform. The common laboratory
balance is calibrated in grams. In this case the least count is 0.1
gram and a reading can be estimated to 0.01 g.
High form beam balance:
In this balance on the left has a dial
mechanism that replaces the lower mass beams.
Digital balance:
The balances with digital readouts are
common and have the advantages of accuracy and ease of
operation. However, these balances are much more delicate.
Some electronic balances have auto calibration and other have
key pad for calibration by the user. Most digital balances are
zeroed by pressing a button and then when the material is added to the dish, the balance
displaces the mass of the content alone.
(b) Vernier calipers:
In 1963 French instrument maker, Pierre Vernier invented the
Vernier calipers in order to improve the precision of length measurements. This scale
consists of two parts: A ruler with a main engraved scale and a movable jaw. The span of the
lower jaw is used to measure the length and is particularly convenient for measuring the
diameter of a cylindrical object. The span of the upper jaw is used to measure the distances
between two surfaces, such as inside diameter of a hollow cylindrical surfaces.
The main scale is calibrated in centimeters
with a millimeter least count, and the movable
Vernier scale has 10 divisions on the main
scale. When making a measurement with a
meter stick it is necessary to estimate the
fractional part of the smallest scale division
(tenth of a millimeter). The function of the
Vernier scale is to assist in the accurate
reading of the fractional part of the scale
division, thus increasing the precision.
If the Vernier mark coincides with the
mark on the main scale, then the Vernier mark
number is the fractional part of the main scale
division. However, a mark on the Vernier scale may not always lineup exactly with one in
the main scale in this case we say there is a change in phase between two successive
Vernier markings.
(c)Micrometer calipers:
Micrometer
calipers
commonly called mike provides for accurate
measurements of small length. This instrument is
particularly convenient in measuring the diameter of a
thin wires and thickness of the thin sheets. The
micrometer calipers consist of a moveable spindle,
parallel faced jaw (Anvil) rotating thimble, engraved
sleeve mounted on a solid frame and ratchet handle.
The axial line on the sleeve main scale is
calibrated in mm. 1 mm main scale divisions is analogous
to 1$ and the thimble scale divisions as cents (0.01). One
complete rotation of the thimble scale is 0.5$ and second
rotation corresponds to going from $0.5 to $1.00, so two
complete rotation go through 100cents, or $1.00 of the
main scale.
Measurements are taken by noting the position of the
edge of the thimble on the main scale and the position of
the reading line on the thimble scale. For example, for the
drawing in the fig.(right) the mike has a reading of
5.785 mm. on the main scale is a reading of 5.000 mm plus one 0.500mm division (scale
below reading line) giving 5.500 mm. Now the thimble is in the second rotation of a main
scale division. The reading on the thimble scale is 0.285mm where 5 is the estimated or
doubtful figure.
Density measurements:
The density,
(rho), o
ρ
f
a substance is defined as the mass m per
volume
V
, i.e.
=
ρ
m/V.
This may be determined experimentally by measuring the mass and
volume of a sample of a substance and calculating the ratio
m/V.
The volume of a regular
shaped object can be calculated from length measurements; for example:
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Related Questions
I want to know the difference % of that's table
while the formula "percent difference= experimental value - known value
----------------------------------* 100%
(know value)
arrow_forward
UNCERTAINTIES IN MEASUREMENT:
2.The mass of 15.0 mL of a particular liquid was measured to be T1=7.47g,T2=7.45g and T3=7.53g.Find the following:
a)the true mass of the liquid
b)the relative uncertainty of the mass of the liquid
c)the percentage uncertainty of its mass
d)the density of the liquid
e)the percent error of its density if the true value is 7.5g/mL
arrow_forward
1. How do we report measurement?
2. How do we determine the best estimate in a single trial experiment and in a multiple trial
experiment?
3. How do we determine the uncertainty in a single trial experiment and in a multiple trial
experiment?
arrow_forward
How to solve this problem
arrow_forward
Can you explain this problem , how do I get to the answer step by step please , this problem is part of significant figures and scientific notation show me how to get the answer
arrow_forward
UNCERTAINTIES IN MEASUREMENT:
1.the dimensions of a metal cylinder were measured three times and yielded the following result:
-height=5.50cm,5.48cm,5.48cm
-diameter=2.50cm,2.54cm,2.54cm
Find:
a) True value (height) of the cylinder
b) True value (diameter ) of the cylinder
c) relative uncertainty of the height of the cylinder
d)the percentage uncertainty of its diameter
e)the volume of the cylinder based on the true values of its dimensions
arrow_forward
What two values are obtained from the following equation?
3.5q2-8.6q-3.2=0
arrow_forward
Question 8
A student obtains a set of measurements for the mass, and size (length, width and
height) of a iron anvil. They then compared their results with the known value for the
anvil.
They find that their results were off by about 20%. The student then repeats the
measurements multiple times, average all of the results and find that now their results
are only off by about 2%.
In this case, which of the follow statements best describes the experimental
uncertainty?
Systematic uncertainty
Random uncertainty
Human error
O Broken equipment
Question 9
The same student obtains a new set of measurements for the mass, and size (length,
width and height) of a different iron anvil and compared their results with the known
value for that anvil.
They find that their new results were off, again, by about 20%. The student then
repeats the measurements multiple times, average all of the results and find that their
results are STILL off by the same amount.
In this case, which of the follow…
arrow_forward
Explain how Physics-related problems are translated from one-dimensional to three-dimensional.
arrow_forward
Question 8
A student obtains a set of measurements for the mass, and size (length, width and
height) of a iron anvil. They then compared their results with the known value for the
anvil.
They find that their results were off by about 20%. The student then repeats the
measurements multiple times, average all of the results and find that now their results
are only off by about 2%.
In this case, which of the follow statements best describes the experimental
uncertainty?
Human error
Broken equipment
Random uncertainty
Systematic uncertainty
Question 9
The same student obtains a new set of measurements for the mass, and size (length,
width and height) of a different iron anvil and compared their results with the known
value for that anvil.
They find that their new results were off, again, by about 20%. The student then
repeats the measurements multiple times, average all of the results and find that their
results are STILL off by the same amount.
In this case, which of the follow statements…
arrow_forward
Question 12
An optical track for a new physics experiment was measured using a high tech laser. It
was found to be 2.71828 m long with an uncertainty of 0.05432 m. Find the relative
uncertainty for this measurement:
0.02
(0.018)
0.02 m
O (2.72 + 0.05) m
O (2.71828 + 0.05432) m
O 0.019
arrow_forward
QUESTION 4
The first estimations of the size of atom were that diameter of the atom was about
10-10 m
O 10-10cm
O 10-10mm
O 10-10dm
arrow_forward
2. In each measurement below, write your reading with the proper number of significant figures and uncertainty and draw the corresponding pdf. Always include units for physics quantities.
arrow_forward
Short questions
5. The volume of a sphere is given by V =-
A sphere has a radius of 0.2 cm and a mass of 345 ug
(micrograms). What is the density of the sphere in SI units? Show the steps for all of the unit
conversions.
arrow_forward
Answer and explain why it is correct, use physics terms
arrow_forward
A group of students are gathering data in a repeated measurement
experiment. The collected data so far is listed below. What is the
uncertainty of the collected data?
4.2, 4.2, 4.2, 4.2, 4.2, 4.2
0.2
0.0
0.5
0.1
arrow_forward
4. How do we determine the accuracy and precision of a measurement? What does the uncertainty
of relate to accuracy and precision?
5. What considerations should we make when choosing the measuring device to use in an
experiment?
arrow_forward
Units, Measurements, and Quantities: The Measurements of Uncertainty
Can you explain this one please? Thank you!
arrow_forward
Modern Physics Item 6
arrow_forward
tabletop
91.41m±0.05m
cube ruler
clipper
micrometer Triple beam balai digital balance
3.30cm±0.05cm 2.184±0.001cm 27.310±0.005mm 64.42±0.05g 64.58±0.01g
2.92m±0.05m 2.71cm±0.05cm 2.482±0.001cm 25.251+0.005mm
216.20m±0.05m 2.50cm±0.05cm 3.136±0.001cm 34.140±10.0005mm
arrow_forward
What are the three fundamental quantities of physics and the units physicists use to measure them?
arrow_forward
Question 1
Saved
Test question:
Please read the linked PDF for this section for the answer to this question:
You report the average value of your measurement as your experimental result.
Evaluate your work and come up with possible shortcomings of the experimental
procedure.
This is the correct answer to the question found within the linked pdf. I have
read and understood the first pdf and I am ready to start the next section.
Human Errors.
Fig Newtons
42
arrow_forward
Units, Measurements, and Quantities: The Measurements of Uncertainty
Can you tell me what to do with this one please? Thank you!
arrow_forward
The question is at the picture. Answer should be round off to 2 decimal points with units.
arrow_forward
QUESTION 15
If experiments provide new data that is not explained by current theories, which of the following are true? Choose all that apply.
The scientists that collected the data made a mistake
The existing theory must immediately get thrown out
The existing theory should be altered to account for the new data
The experiment should be conducted by other scientists to see if the data is correct
The experiment should be repeated by the same scientists
A completely new theory might be necessary, but it must be able to explain previously verified results from the existing theory
arrow_forward
Assuming standard notations, which of the following quantities is dimensionless?
a) v/a
b) P/Fv
c) FE/L
d) V2/g
arrow_forward
When a scientist looks at an experiment and then predicts the results of other related experiments, which type of reasoning is she using? Explain your answer.
arrow_forward
C. leas t del Niu
3. Three students make measurements (in m) of the length of a rod using a meter stick. Each
student's measurements are tabulated in the table below. Using your calculator in statistic
mode calculate the mean L, standard deviation S and uncertainty u of the measurements.
Student
L1
L3
L2
1.4711
L4
1.4715
SD
u
Student 1
1.4717
1.4722
1,4716
t.4754
1.4710
1.4753
1.4759
1.4756
1.4749
Student 2
Student 3
1.4719
1.4723
1.4705
1.4719
Note that the actual length of the rod is determined by a laser measurement technique to be
1.4715 m (this should be considered the standard value).
a) State how one determines the accuracy of a measurement. Apply your idea to the
measurements of the three students above and state which student has the most
accurate measurement.
arrow_forward
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
College Physics
Physics
ISBN:9781305952300
Author:Raymond A. Serway, Chris Vuille
Publisher:Cengage Learning
University Physics (14th Edition)
Physics
ISBN:9780133969290
Author:Hugh D. Young, Roger A. Freedman
Publisher:PEARSON
Introduction To Quantum Mechanics
Physics
ISBN:9781107189638
Author:Griffiths, David J., Schroeter, Darrell F.
Publisher:Cambridge University Press
Physics for Scientists and Engineers
Physics
ISBN:9781337553278
Author:Raymond A. Serway, John W. Jewett
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Lecture- Tutorials for Introductory Astronomy
Physics
ISBN:9780321820464
Author:Edward E. Prather, Tim P. Slater, Jeff P. Adams, Gina Brissenden
Publisher:Addison-Wesley
College Physics: A Strategic Approach (4th Editio...
Physics
ISBN:9780134609034
Author:Randall D. Knight (Professor Emeritus), Brian Jones, Stuart Field
Publisher:PEARSON
Related Questions
- I want to know the difference % of that's table while the formula "percent difference= experimental value - known value ----------------------------------* 100% (know value)arrow_forwardUNCERTAINTIES IN MEASUREMENT: 2.The mass of 15.0 mL of a particular liquid was measured to be T1=7.47g,T2=7.45g and T3=7.53g.Find the following: a)the true mass of the liquid b)the relative uncertainty of the mass of the liquid c)the percentage uncertainty of its mass d)the density of the liquid e)the percent error of its density if the true value is 7.5g/mLarrow_forward1. How do we report measurement? 2. How do we determine the best estimate in a single trial experiment and in a multiple trial experiment? 3. How do we determine the uncertainty in a single trial experiment and in a multiple trial experiment?arrow_forward
- How to solve this problemarrow_forwardCan you explain this problem , how do I get to the answer step by step please , this problem is part of significant figures and scientific notation show me how to get the answerarrow_forwardUNCERTAINTIES IN MEASUREMENT: 1.the dimensions of a metal cylinder were measured three times and yielded the following result: -height=5.50cm,5.48cm,5.48cm -diameter=2.50cm,2.54cm,2.54cm Find: a) True value (height) of the cylinder b) True value (diameter ) of the cylinder c) relative uncertainty of the height of the cylinder d)the percentage uncertainty of its diameter e)the volume of the cylinder based on the true values of its dimensionsarrow_forward
- What two values are obtained from the following equation? 3.5q2-8.6q-3.2=0arrow_forwardQuestion 8 A student obtains a set of measurements for the mass, and size (length, width and height) of a iron anvil. They then compared their results with the known value for the anvil. They find that their results were off by about 20%. The student then repeats the measurements multiple times, average all of the results and find that now their results are only off by about 2%. In this case, which of the follow statements best describes the experimental uncertainty? Systematic uncertainty Random uncertainty Human error O Broken equipment Question 9 The same student obtains a new set of measurements for the mass, and size (length, width and height) of a different iron anvil and compared their results with the known value for that anvil. They find that their new results were off, again, by about 20%. The student then repeats the measurements multiple times, average all of the results and find that their results are STILL off by the same amount. In this case, which of the follow…arrow_forwardExplain how Physics-related problems are translated from one-dimensional to three-dimensional.arrow_forward
- Question 8 A student obtains a set of measurements for the mass, and size (length, width and height) of a iron anvil. They then compared their results with the known value for the anvil. They find that their results were off by about 20%. The student then repeats the measurements multiple times, average all of the results and find that now their results are only off by about 2%. In this case, which of the follow statements best describes the experimental uncertainty? Human error Broken equipment Random uncertainty Systematic uncertainty Question 9 The same student obtains a new set of measurements for the mass, and size (length, width and height) of a different iron anvil and compared their results with the known value for that anvil. They find that their new results were off, again, by about 20%. The student then repeats the measurements multiple times, average all of the results and find that their results are STILL off by the same amount. In this case, which of the follow statements…arrow_forwardQuestion 12 An optical track for a new physics experiment was measured using a high tech laser. It was found to be 2.71828 m long with an uncertainty of 0.05432 m. Find the relative uncertainty for this measurement: 0.02 (0.018) 0.02 m O (2.72 + 0.05) m O (2.71828 + 0.05432) m O 0.019arrow_forwardQUESTION 4 The first estimations of the size of atom were that diameter of the atom was about 10-10 m O 10-10cm O 10-10mm O 10-10dmarrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- College PhysicsPhysicsISBN:9781305952300Author:Raymond A. Serway, Chris VuillePublisher:Cengage LearningUniversity Physics (14th Edition)PhysicsISBN:9780133969290Author:Hugh D. Young, Roger A. FreedmanPublisher:PEARSONIntroduction To Quantum MechanicsPhysicsISBN:9781107189638Author:Griffiths, David J., Schroeter, Darrell F.Publisher:Cambridge University Press
- Physics for Scientists and EngineersPhysicsISBN:9781337553278Author:Raymond A. Serway, John W. JewettPublisher:Cengage LearningLecture- Tutorials for Introductory AstronomyPhysicsISBN:9780321820464Author:Edward E. Prather, Tim P. Slater, Jeff P. Adams, Gina BrissendenPublisher:Addison-WesleyCollege Physics: A Strategic Approach (4th Editio...PhysicsISBN:9780134609034Author:Randall D. Knight (Professor Emeritus), Brian Jones, Stuart FieldPublisher:PEARSON
College Physics
Physics
ISBN:9781305952300
Author:Raymond A. Serway, Chris Vuille
Publisher:Cengage Learning
University Physics (14th Edition)
Physics
ISBN:9780133969290
Author:Hugh D. Young, Roger A. Freedman
Publisher:PEARSON
Introduction To Quantum Mechanics
Physics
ISBN:9781107189638
Author:Griffiths, David J., Schroeter, Darrell F.
Publisher:Cambridge University Press
Physics for Scientists and Engineers
Physics
ISBN:9781337553278
Author:Raymond A. Serway, John W. Jewett
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Lecture- Tutorials for Introductory Astronomy
Physics
ISBN:9780321820464
Author:Edward E. Prather, Tim P. Slater, Jeff P. Adams, Gina Brissenden
Publisher:Addison-Wesley
College Physics: A Strategic Approach (4th Editio...
Physics
ISBN:9780134609034
Author:Randall D. Knight (Professor Emeritus), Brian Jones, Stuart Field
Publisher:PEARSON