Worksheet - BATNA Analysis

.pdf

School

University of Guelph-Humber *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

4360

Subject

Political Science

Date

Feb 20, 2024

Type

pdf

Pages

4

Uploaded by DoctorStrawGoldfinch5

Worksheet - BATNA Analysis Step 1: Party 1’s (You) Position: What does Party 1 want? The United States, which acquired the Louisiana Territory from France in 1803, is referred to as Party For a number of reasons, including territorial expansion, economic gain, national security, and political clout, the US desired to buy the territory. By acquiring the Louisiana Territory, the United States was able to consolidate its status as a major world power and further its strategic objectives by taking control of a sizable and resource-rich part of North America. Step 2: Consider Party 1’s Interests: Identify the interests that have lead Party 1 to their position. 1. Military Conquest 2. Diplomatic Pressure 3. Alternative Trade Routes 4. Status Step 3: Determine Party 1’s Alternatives (include listing the BATNA and WATNA) Military Conquest Pros: ● Could result in a swift acquisition of the territory ● Would enable the United States to establish control over the region Cons: ● Would likely result in significant loss of life and resources ● Could lead to conflict with France and other European powers ● Could be seen as aggressive and could damage the United States' reputation on the world stage Diplomatic Pressure Pros: ● Could be a relatively low-risk option ● Could result in a negotiated agreement that is beneficial to both parties Cons: ● May not be effective in persuading France to sell the territory ● Could damage diplomatic relations between the United States and France ● Could be a time-consuming process and could delay the United States' expansion plans Alternative Trade Routes Pros: ● Could provide the United States with new trade opportunities and access to new markets ● Could reduce the nation's dependence on the Mississippi River Cons: ● Could be a costly and time-consuming process to build new trade routes ● May not be as efficient or effective as controlling the Mississippi River
● Could require significant negotiation with other nations to establish new trade routes Status Pros: ● Could avoid conflict with France and other European powers ● Could maintain the existing trade arrangements and territorial boundaries Cons: ● Could limit the United States' ability to expand westward and gain control of new territories ● Could be seen as a missed opportunity to strengthen the nation's position and influence ● May not address the underlying issues that led the United States to pursue the Louisiana Purchase in the first place. Step 5: It is feasible that the United States would have pursued different trade channels as a backup strategy based on the historical context and the benefits and drawbacks of each choice. Step 6: Parties 2 and 3 in the Louisiana Purchase discussions relate to the country then governed by Napoleon Bonaparte, France. Napoleon wanted to raise money to support his military efforts in Europe, so he sold the Louisiana Territory to the United States (Party 1). Step 7: 1. Need for funds to finance military campaigns 2. Desire to remove the British threat to the colony 3. Lack of profitability of the colony 4. Potential for improved diplomatic relations with the United States Step 8: 1. Retaining the territory and bolstering fortifications 2. Transferring the land to another foreign power 3. Leasing the territory to the United States 4. Holding out for a better deal Step 9: Keeping the territory and strengthening defenses ● Pro: France would retain control over the Louisiana Territory and potentially prevent British or American aggression. It could also continue to extract resources from the territory. ● Con: Strengthening the defenses of the Louisiana Territory would be costly and may not be sustainable in the long term. It could also lead to conflict with the United States or other foreign powers. Selling the territory to another foreign power ● Pro: France could potentially receive a better deal from another foreign power, or avoid conflict with the United States by selling the territory to a neutral power. ● Con: The ongoing war in Europe could make it difficult to find a buyer for the territory, and selling to a hostile power like Great Britain could have negative diplomatic and military consequences. Leasing the territory to the United States
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help