POL 109 Essay 1

.pdf

School

University of Toronto *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

LEC5101

Subject

Political Science

Date

Dec 6, 2023

Type

pdf

Pages

5

Uploaded by SuperHumanApeMaster741

Report
POL109 October 24, 2023 Evaluating the Moral Justification of The Russia-Ukraine War Throughout human history, we have acknowledged the works of ancient and classical thinkers as indispensable and timeless sources of wisdom that can provide valuable insights into the contemporary world. As expressed by American novelist Pearl S. Buck (1892-1973) "If you want to understand today, you have to search yesterday," 1 . This rings true in the volatile world of modern international relations where we see the complexities of power dynamics, ethics, and global conflicts. Despite dating back hundreds, sometimes even thousands of years, the observations and reflections made by ancient thinkers are valuable because their works allow us to consider ethics, morals, and history when we look at contemporary politics. This essay argues that there is merit in studying the work of classical philosophers in the context of modern politics. The philosophical perspectives of Thucydides and Francesco de Vitoria are useful in assessing morality and ethics in modern conflicts. With the example of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, Thucydides' moral justifications for war and Vitoria's perspectives about restrictions in modern warfare reflect the importance of considering the works of ancient and classical thinkers in contemporary politics. The philosophical work of Thucydides provides valuable insights about the justifications for why states go to war and could have helped to predict Russia's aggression towards Ukraine. 1 “A Quote by Pearl S. Buck,” Goodreads, accessed October 23, 2023, https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/267037-if-you-want-to-understand-today-you-have-to-search . 1
In his book, "The History of the Peloponnesian Wars," the Ancient Greek philosopher 2 Thucydides' argues that there are several reasons why states might go to war. Most pertinent to the Russia-Ukraine conflict, Thucydides cites fear, the violation of rights, and self-preservation as reasons for a morally justified war 3 . While studying Russian aggression in Ukraine, the historical parallels with the Peloponnesian War become more apparent, and Thucydides' insights hold more relevance. There are various theories about the reasons for Russian aggression in Ukraine. Some political scientists such as Taras Kuzio, for example, argue that Russia's motivations for invading Ukraine are based on Russian Imperialism 4 . Other experts in the field, however, such as John Mearsheimer, argue that this is a baseless claim, and Russian invasion of Ukraine is based on fear of NATO's activities in Ukraine 5 . While it is difficult to determine the true causes of war 6 . Mearsheimer's argument that the conflict in Russia and Ukraine stemmed from fear seems credible. Mearsheimer explains that NATO's attempts to integrate Ukraine into the EU are alarming to Russia, and create a fear that Ukraine will turn into a "pro-Western liberal democracy" 7 . Russian dissatisfaction with this attempt has been clear since the 2008 annual NATO summit, where the integration of Ukraine and Georgia into the EU was first proposed. Russia's reaction was immediate, and they made it clear that this decision "was an existential threat to Russia" 8 . In the following years, Russia's stance on this has remained unchanged, with 8 John J Mearsheimer, “The Causes and Consequences of the Ukraine War,” Horizons , 2022, Summer edition, sec. 1, 19. 7 John J Mearsheimer, “The Causes and Consequences of the Ukraine War,” Horizons , 2022, Summer edition, sec. 1, 18. 6 David Zarnett, “Week #3 Lecture Slides,” Might & Right: Power and Justice in International Relations (lecture, September 2023). 5 John J Mearsheimer, “The Causes and Consequences of the Ukraine War,” Horizons , 2022, Summer edition, sec. 1. 4 Taras Kuzio, “Imperial Nationalism as the Driver behind Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine,” Nations and Nationalism 29, no. 1 (2022): 30–38, https://doi.org/10.1111/nana.12875. 3 Thucydides and Pelling C B R., “Chapter III: Congress of the Peloponnesian Confederacy at Lacedaemon,” in The History of the Peloponnesian War (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022). 2 David Zarnett, “Week #2 Lecture Slides,” Might & Right: Power and Justice in International Relations (lecture, September 2023). 2
Russian President Vladimir Putin arguing that NATO's operations in Ukraine are happening "on the doorstep" of Russia 9 , justifying Russian aggression as based on fear. Thucydides' philosophical insights are critical to acknowledging to understanding the motivations behind interstate conflicts in contemporary politics, such as the Russia-Ukraine war. Mearsheimer's rationale for the Russian invasion of Ukraine echoes Thucydides' ideas of "just war", suggesting that NATO expansion into Ukraine may have contributed to the conflict, and Russia's reactions to the war are justifiable. Applying Thucydides' teachings in the context of modern global politics allows us to discern an element of fear from the Russian state – the concern that Russia's neighboring states, Ukraine and Georgia, might evolve into liberal, pro-Western democracies. Viewing this conflict through a philosophical lens makes the Russia-Ukraine war less surprising. Francesco de Vitoria's insights on civil immunity and the constraints of warfare hold relevance when examining the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Vitoria explains that even in the pursuit of just causes, the manner in which a war is conducted is crucial, with ethical restrictions being imperative to maintain its just character 10 . Within the context of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, Vitoria's arguments about the necessity for proportionality in the use of force in a just war, as well as the importance of distinguishing the innocent from the guilty offer valuable insights into the conduct of the Russia-Ukraine war. While Russia's offensive position in the Russia-Ukraine conflict was justified by Thucydides' justifications for war, the substantial casualties faced by Ukrainian civilians because 10 Richard Shelly Hartigan, “Francesco de Vitoria and Civilian Immunity,” Political Theory 1, no. 1 (1973): 79–91, https://doi.org/10.1177/009059177300100109. 9 David Zarnett, “Week #2 Lecture Slides,” Might & Right: Power and Justice in International Relations (lecture, September 2023). 3
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help