POL 109 Essay 1
.pdf
keyboard_arrow_up
School
University of Toronto *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
LEC5101
Subject
Political Science
Date
Dec 6, 2023
Type
Pages
5
Uploaded by SuperHumanApeMaster741
POL109
October 24, 2023
Evaluating the Moral Justification of The Russia-Ukraine War
Throughout human history, we have acknowledged the works of ancient and classical
thinkers as indispensable and timeless sources of wisdom that can provide valuable insights into
the contemporary world. As expressed by American novelist Pearl S. Buck (1892-1973) "If you
want to understand today, you have to search yesterday,"
1
. This rings true in the volatile world of
modern international relations where we see the complexities of power dynamics, ethics, and
global conflicts. Despite dating back hundreds, sometimes even thousands of years, the
observations and reflections made by ancient thinkers are valuable because their works allow us
to consider ethics, morals, and history when we look at contemporary politics. This essay argues
that there is merit in studying the work of classical philosophers in the context of modern
politics. The philosophical perspectives of Thucydides and Francesco de Vitoria are useful in
assessing morality and ethics in modern conflicts. With the example of the Russia-Ukraine
conflict, Thucydides' moral justifications for war and Vitoria's perspectives about restrictions in
modern warfare reflect the importance of considering the works of ancient and classical thinkers
in contemporary politics.
The philosophical work of Thucydides provides valuable insights about the justifications
for why states go to war and could have helped to predict Russia's aggression towards Ukraine.
1
“A Quote by Pearl S. Buck,” Goodreads, accessed October 23, 2023,
https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/267037-if-you-want-to-understand-today-you-have-to-search
.
1
In his book, "The History of the Peloponnesian Wars," the Ancient Greek philosopher
2
Thucydides' argues that there are several reasons why states might go to war. Most pertinent to
the Russia-Ukraine conflict, Thucydides cites fear, the violation of rights, and self-preservation
as reasons for a morally justified war
3
.
While
studying
Russian
aggression
in
Ukraine,
the
historical
parallels
with
the
Peloponnesian War become more apparent, and Thucydides' insights hold more relevance. There
are various theories about the reasons for Russian aggression in Ukraine. Some political
scientists such as Taras Kuzio, for example, argue that Russia's motivations for invading Ukraine
are
based
on
Russian
Imperialism
4
.
Other experts in the field, however, such as John
Mearsheimer, argue that this is a baseless claim, and Russian invasion of Ukraine is based on
fear of NATO's activities in Ukraine
5
. While it is difficult to determine the true causes of war
6
.
Mearsheimer's argument that the conflict in Russia and Ukraine stemmed from fear seems
credible. Mearsheimer explains that NATO's attempts to integrate Ukraine into the EU are
alarming to Russia, and create a fear that Ukraine will turn into a "pro-Western liberal
democracy"
7
. Russian dissatisfaction with this attempt has been clear since the 2008 annual
NATO summit, where the integration of Ukraine and Georgia into the EU was first proposed.
Russia's reaction was immediate, and they made it clear that this decision "was an existential
threat to Russia"
8
. In the following years, Russia's stance on this has remained unchanged, with
8
John J Mearsheimer, “The Causes and Consequences of the Ukraine War,”
Horizons
, 2022, Summer edition, sec. 1,
19.
7
John J Mearsheimer, “The Causes and Consequences of the Ukraine War,”
Horizons
, 2022, Summer edition, sec. 1,
18.
6
David Zarnett, “Week #3 Lecture Slides,”
Might & Right: Power and Justice in International Relations
(lecture, September 2023).
5
John J Mearsheimer, “The Causes and Consequences of the Ukraine War,”
Horizons
, 2022, Summer edition, sec. 1.
4
Taras Kuzio, “Imperial Nationalism as the Driver behind Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine,”
Nations and Nationalism
29, no. 1 (2022): 30–38, https://doi.org/10.1111/nana.12875.
3
Thucydides and Pelling C B R., “Chapter III: Congress of the Peloponnesian Confederacy at Lacedaemon,”
in
The History of the Peloponnesian War
(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022).
2
David Zarnett, “Week #2 Lecture Slides,”
Might & Right: Power and Justice in International Relations
(lecture, September 2023).
2
Russian President Vladimir Putin arguing that NATO's operations in Ukraine are happening "on
the doorstep" of Russia
9
, justifying Russian aggression as based on fear.
Thucydides' philosophical insights are critical to acknowledging to understanding the
motivations behind interstate conflicts in contemporary politics, such as the Russia-Ukraine war.
Mearsheimer's rationale for the Russian invasion of Ukraine echoes Thucydides' ideas of "just
war", suggesting that NATO expansion into Ukraine may have contributed to the conflict, and
Russia's reactions to the war are justifiable. Applying Thucydides' teachings in the context of
modern global politics allows us to discern an element of fear from the Russian state – the
concern that Russia's neighboring states, Ukraine and Georgia, might evolve into liberal,
pro-Western
democracies.
Viewing
this
conflict
through a philosophical lens makes the
Russia-Ukraine war less surprising.
Francesco de Vitoria's insights on civil immunity and the constraints of warfare hold
relevance when examining the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Vitoria explains that even in the pursuit
of just causes, the manner in which a war is conducted is crucial, with ethical restrictions being
imperative to maintain its just character
10
. Within the context of the Russia-Ukraine conflict,
Vitoria's arguments about the necessity for proportionality in the use of force in a just war, as
well as the importance of distinguishing the innocent from the guilty offer valuable insights into
the conduct of the Russia-Ukraine war.
While Russia's offensive position in the Russia-Ukraine conflict was justified by
Thucydides' justifications for war, the substantial casualties faced by Ukrainian civilians because
10
Richard Shelly Hartigan, “Francesco de Vitoria and Civilian Immunity,”
Political Theory
1, no. 1 (1973): 79–91,
https://doi.org/10.1177/009059177300100109.
9
David Zarnett, “Week #2 Lecture Slides,”
Might & Right: Power and Justice in International Relations
(lecture, September 2023).
3
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help