Pol Rough Draft

.docx

School

Southern New Hampshire University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

10067

Subject

Political Science

Date

Dec 6, 2023

Type

docx

Pages

8

Uploaded by SuperResolveDolphin30

The Second Amendment Joshua Chambers Southern New Hampshire University Politics 200
Abstract To be sure, one of the more controversial amendments would be the Second Amendment. This is the amendment that covers a private citizens right to bear arms. This amendment has been analyzed from many different standpoints. From wording to grammar, the Second amendment has been interpreted in different ways by the two parties. It has even defied logic convention when it comes to how the parties typically look at the constitution. I will try and shed some light on the framers thinking about why they worded the amendment the way they did. In doing this I will lean heavily on case law and research from respected scholars from both sides of the political aisle. We will look to the typically republican/conservative pro-gun view as well as the liberal/democrat gun control camps to give an unbiased look into this topic. Thesis Statement I plan on explaining in depth that from its inception the second amendment mirrors the open-endedness. The framers’ intended to leave the amendment vague to allow for adaptation to changing times and technology. I will engage in good faith the gun control argument by
providing statistics, case law and scholarly research to help us understand the effect the Second Amendment has on not only a private citizen but how it works with other amendments in the constitution. The Liberal/Democrat View of The Second Amendment By and large you will find the current state of the democratic party to be in favor of gun control and tight restrictions and regulations on how and what can be purchased as a private citizen. Obviously not all democrats are as drastic as others. But they all do believe that you can legislate your way to ending gun violence that no doubt does plague many major as well as minor cities throughout the US. Democrats believe that they can reduce gun violence while respecting the rights of responsible gun owners. They believe they should expand and strengthen background checks for those who want to purchase a firearm because it shouldn’t be easier to get a gun than a driver’s license in their estimation (one marked difference would be there is no right to a driver’s license embedded in the constitution. It is considered a privilege in most states.) How Do the Democrats Read and Interpret the Second Amendment One of the major points of contention that democrats make is illustrated by Rep. Jamie Raskin of Maryland. In defending a Biden Administration ruling upholding a rule enacted by the ATF banning pistol braces (something we will cover at a later point in this paper.) Rep. Raskin stated that we don’t want them to repeal the Second Amendment. We want them to read the Second Amendment.” Raskin argued that his Republican colleagues repeatedly invoke the second half of the Second Amendment, describing the right to keep and bear arms, but gloss over
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help