B

.docx

School

University of Phoenix *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

645

Subject

Psychology

Date

May 26, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

7

Uploaded by ChiefDinosaur4159

Report
Week Six Summative Assessment: Marshmallow Experiment Siara Brooks University of Phoenix Psych/645 Craig Schweon June 19, 2023 Week Six Summative Assessment: Marshmallow Experiment
The key to reaching one's goal is learning how to put off gratification to achieve a more meaningful and satisfying goal. The results of future ambitions will be directly impacted by one's capacity for self-regulation. The prospect of having to wait for a lengthy outcome is less appealing in a culture where messages are continually being transmitted that one can potentially get rid of the anguish immediately. In this paper, a personal interaction will be discussed. It will detail interaction at a company meeting on employee bonuses, including demonstrating enthusiasm, work productivity from staff personnel and on a personal level. Lastly, it will describe how The Stanford Marshmallow Experiment applies to this scenario. Biological and Social Determinants on Personality A person's circumstances, standards, behaviors, and other characteristics that jointly influence their conduct are referred to as their personality. Furthermore, a biological strategy can be used. It is appropriate for evaluating a person's personality fundamentally since it assesses their biological traits from an essential perspective. While there are several, varied definitions of personality, the majority place a high emphasis on the characteristics and behaviors which may be utilized to predict and explain a person's conduct. It covers everything from the genetic basis for personality characteristics to the impact of experiences and environment. The main factor that characterizes many facets of an individual's personality is their genetic makeup. Character is the main aspect that determines it, but it also includes a lot of other factors that reveal a lot more about a person. One of the key elements affecting personality is appearance. One's outward appearance greatly affects the way other people view them. From the time of conception, traits can be anticipated. It follows that the genes contained in chromosomes are the most accurate solution for personality from a genetic perspective. The social variables examine an individual's character in relation to
where they stand in their peer group or society and how they perceive their place there. This approach's main assumption is that our own development is influenced by how others see us. During this time, communication technologies have been more widely accessible, mostly via social media. Delayed Gratification Concepts Deferred gratification, discipline, and autonomy are terms that are frequently and inconsistently utilized interchangeably. The typical definition of delayed gratification is the capacity to postpone an urge for an immediate reward in favor of a more desirable reward at a later moment. Research has demonstrated that individuals with great achievement have the capacity to postpone receiving rewards. Improved achieved objectives, the creation of new brain connections through brain development, and the development of new patterns of behavior originate from fully identifying and experiencing consciousness of the impulse. The development of assessment capabilities brings new insight into interventions due to the extensive effects of adulthood's inability to suppress impulses. Future study must focus heavily on improving our comprehension of population trends in delayed gratification measures. Helping someone reiterate their future self-promotes growth in motivation and delayed gratification skills, which enhances general health in the five dimensions of autonomy. The Marshmallow Experiment Overview Research conducted by Walter Mischel in the late 1960s shed light on the importance of discipline and postponed gratification for success in the future. An area was set up with marshmallows in front of a chosen group of preschoolers from the Stanford University neighborhood. The children were then offered two options before the researcher informed them
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help