12 Angry Men

‘Twelve angry men’ shows that personal experience is the strongest factor influencing human decision-making processes.’ Discuss

Note: If this is a group assessment submission, please list the student name and numbers of all group members in the above box.

12. Juror Twelve is in advertising, and cannot conceive of people on any level other than images.

First impressions are not always right. This is what this essay is about, and my opinion is that you should not judge even though it's hard not to. I've stereotyped and judged a person by their looks, but I was wrong and it made me feel bad. He was a good guy and he became one of my best friends. This is a 12 Angry Men essay about all the stereotyping and judging someone by their looks that is on trial in the

The movie “12 Angry Men” covers different negotiation and conflict resolutions. The communication is set in a jury room where people with different worldview are bargaining over the judgment of a murder case. Juror 8 is willing to stand alone with his vote “not guilty”. Trying to avoid the winner’s course, he demanded a conversation about the case despite the clear 11-1 vote on the guilt of the defendant. Juror 8 discredits his opponents’ arguments and uncovers their constraint thinking, he uncovering doubtful evidence, alienating hardliners and engaging in conversations. In the conversation it becomes obvious that not every juror bases his decision on the same facts, and

This movie was great to see again and to experience all the different dynamics that were occurring amongst the 12 jurors. The time frame in which this movie takes place is not too different than what we experience today in our judicial system. The major differences today would be we do not discriminate based upon age, race or gender. All three of these factors would influence how the jurors would interact with one another and would eventually have a major impact on the final verdict. Juror 8 was so successful in convincing the other 11 jurors for two simple facts. He demonstrated assertiveness and use of reason. While his peers and the foreman fell into a group think mentality from the

Twelve Angry Men is a very interesting film. As the evidence is brought up to question by the jurors themselves. The complexity of this case grew as the films went on. Then came the hard part, making the decision, guilty or not guilty. Especially when you have jurors that are over shadowed by prejudice that influence their decision. It is only when prejudice is set aside that the jurors’ are able to make a more logical decision on the case. As the movie continues, all twelve jurors slowly arrive in the room. They take a seat according to their jury numbers and begin to discuss the case. The foreman then reviews the case. You learn that the man is accused of killing his father and all jurors must vote guilty or not guilty for there to

The movie, Twelve Angry Men, was filled with multiple organizational behaviors which were have been discussed in class and in out text. All characters provided strong arguments, which was supported by strong evidence. After intense debate, it was obvious that some of the juror’s opinions were regulated by their own past experiences, beliefs, and bias. After watching the movie, the two most important factors I noticed were path goal theory, charismatic leadership, and power and politics. Path-goal theory is a key concept within chapter twelves contingency theories.

Twelve Angry Men is a play with interesting conflicts. This play takes place in a jury room, where it is hot, sweaty and cluttered. The case is about a young boy accused of murdering his father. One man is keeping them from leaving, the man who voted not guilty. You can imagine how irritated the others might be when there is eleven votes against one and no one is allowed to leave until they have all agreed on a verdict.

Psychology plays an influential role in many aspects of everyday life; however it is not only in these instances that psychology’s role is valued. Through mass media such as movies, video games, and television, the viewer is able to digest the importance of psychology from the interactions witnessed between the environment and characters. This crucial interaction is no exception in the movie, Good Will Hunting, as the stars Robin Williams, Matt Damon and Ben Affleck show the viewers the importance of psychology through their interaction and use of multiple psychological principles including unconditional positive regard, attachment and defense mechanisms. Through these psychological principles, the viewer comes to value healing, coping and

12 Angry Men was one of the most critically acclaimed movies of its time, even gaining several Oscar nominations. The movie tugged into strings that in the course of watching the movie, or even after, continuously made me think. How will one person convince eleven other jurors of reasonable doubt and change their votes from guilty to not guilty? Twelve jurors have individual stands and differences that may have been affected by their experiences and upbringing. Every person in the movie represents current ethical and moral dilemmas that plague even individuals of today. Each character also represents values and personal growth that we already have or hope to achieve.

In my research, I have found that students are prone to becoming very overwhelmed and consequently feel unprepared for college. For instance, Venezia and Jaeger writes: “In addition to directly supporting academic preparation for students, capacity-building efforts need to focus on ensuring that large comprehensive high schools have strong college-going cultures, on providing the necessary professional development for educators to help all students meet college readiness standards, on supporting the development of strong habits of mind for all students, and on providing students with the information and supports to help them select the most appropriate postsecondary institution” (Venezia and Jaeger 131). In making this comment, they urge us

Two years into his college career at Harvard, Bill Gates decided to drop out and follow his own path. At the age of thirty one, Bill Gates became the youngest billionaire ever. While education is an important part of our society, it can at times be limiting. There is nothing wrong with the traditional route of four years in school and a subsequent nine-to-five job, but this path leaves no room for the extraordinary. Happy or not, those who conform to this standard sign away their freedom to fulfill someone else’s wishes. Unfortunately, most people pay this price without fully realizing the cost of American conformity.

In this essay I will be an analysis of group communication using the movie 12 Angry Men.The movie 12 Angry men is a movie about a jury made up of 12 men as they deliberate the guilt or acquittal of a defendant on the basis of reasonable doubt. They go through many different problems during the deliberation.

• Attendance 10% • Mid-term coursework: 40% • Coursework (group-based format) • Assessment method: • - Oral presentation • - Written report • Final examination: 50% • Multiple choice • Case study