My Conflict Resolution Style

How many interpersonal conflicts have you been in today, this week, or even this month? Do you even know which conflict styles you normally use when faced with a disagreement? Furthermore, this analysis shall reflect on my particular conflict styles, with an in-depth look at possible benefits of knowing the conflict styles I tend to incorporate, and how behaviors change based on a relationship and the environment.

In this paper I will discuss the conflict that is occurring at General Hospital, the conflict management styles that are evident in the case, and how General Hospital could have used teams to address the cost reductions needed to stay competitive. I will also describe how the CEO of General Hospital, Mike Hammer can us negotiation skills to get buy-in for the cost reductions and finally I will recommend a strategy for Hammer to resolve the problem.

When looking at how my fiancé views my conflict style compared to my own view, I wasn’t shocked. She also determined that I would be in the Non-Confrontational category, but the figures were slightly different compared to my own. With my own assessment, the highest figure was Non-Confrontational and then Solution-Orientation. With her assessment of me, it went Non-Confrontational and then Control oriented. So she views my conflict style slightly different then how I view my own. I don’t think that we have ever really narrowed it down to why we choose to go through conflicts that way. I believe that we both have always viewed conflicts as being negative and destructive instead of possibly constructive. I think we have avoided laying down a general outline of expectations and goals fearing that one would appear more in power over the other.

I find that my desire to avoid can put off the wrong vibe to those under my care. The last thing I want people to think of me when it comes to conflict is that I attempt to avoid it at all cost. That can be casted in a negative light. The greatest room for improvement for me in this area is using this style more out of habit than using it when necessary. Since I scored high, there is a good chance I am overusing this style. I have to be more intentional in how I deal with conflict. Though I tend to see conflict as a disruption in the flow and the work at hand and in my opinion it causes unnecessary stress so I only attempt to address it when it is unavoidable. This can hurt my leadership position in a lot of cases and I must learn to use it

For centuries, violence has been the go to way to settle conflicts, but it has also been very controversial throughout the years. While some say war is important in order to maintain our freedom, it is actually a very unnecessary and destructive way of settling conflicts because it kills so many innocent people and it hardly ever accomplishes anything for such a hefty price.

Conflicts through communication key concepts that I will outline are common ground and adjudication. Common ground is consists of attitudes, values, behaviors, expectations and goals the parties share and can serve as a basis for an agreement (Cahn & Abigail, 2014, p. 258), and adjudication; which is a neutral judge and jury in the legal system hear attorneys who prosecute of defend people and decide a case, which either party may later appeal. (Cahn & Abigail, 2014, p. 249). Though I did not have to experience these two concepts, however, my father had to experience this during his divorce process from his second marriage. The year was 1989 and I was a senior in high school ready for that final bell, so I could get ready for our final football practice before Friday’s game. Over the class loudspeaker was the principal excused himself to

Zig Ziglar once said, “Positive thinking will let you do everything better than negative thinking will.” In more than one way Ziglar was correct in saying this, a positive attitude is better than a negative one, especially when it comes to conflict. Anne Frank and Mrs.Breed both show how a positive attitude towards a problem would help more than a negative one. In my experience, negative thinking results in more conflict, which means, positive thinking results with a solution, most of the time. This leads me to believe, a positive attitude is the best response to conflict.

Our response to conflict can show us how determined , responsible, or terrified you are or will become or have . Leader can rise to the occasion and deal with conflict. While people like the character shmuel from the boy in the striped pajamas can’t.

I think that conflicts that are resolved with equal effort and commitment tend to help relationships grow stronger and last longer. For example, if my boyfriend and I got into an argument and equally communicated with one another and resolved the issue as soon as possible, this would result in a growth in our relationship. Now if my boyfriend and I got into an argument and refused to talk about and work out the problem, this would result in bigger problems and larger decisions need to be made regarding the relationship itself. Conflicts are not always classified as bad conflicts. If conflicts are constantly occurring throughout a relationship and there is not equal effort being put in on both sides of the relationship to resolve these issues, then this is no longer improving or building a relationship. This is when I believe that the two need to figure out if their relationship is worth their while. Bad conflicts are those that are not dealt with equally between the two involved and their intentions are not to overcome and build a stronger relationship. Good conflicts are those that are worked out equally and help build the relationship as time moves on. The chapter provides ways to approach a conflict and how to handle it. There are five ways people generally handle conflicts: avoidance, accommodation, competition, reactivity, or

Some individuals decide to take action to handle the situation while others won’t. There are people like Winston Churchill, a leader , who is brave and will not back down. On the contrary Shmuel , a prisoner at a concentration camp, deals with conflict the opposite way that Churchill does. Although their struggles are a bit different , this shows what kind of person they are.

Each of us typically uses only one or two conflict resolution strategies in most situations (Williams, n.d.). As I assess my own comfort level with conflict, I would rate my comfort level with conflict as poor. I typically use avoidance strategies to deal with conflict if the issue is not critical. I believe the reason for this is I value what people think of me, especially if I have an ongoing relationship with them. I do not like it when people are upset or angry with me. I am a generally thought of as a “people pleaser”. Time pressure, issue importance, relationship importance, and the amount of power one person has compared to the other affects which conflict management strategy a person uses (Williams,

The way a person responds to conflict can determine success or failure. The type of response a person has can have an impact impact on them and the people around them. This being said, people can react to different types of conflict in different ways.

As humans being we should constantly be trying to improve ourselves each and every day. It is not easy to try and assess ourselves but it is a necessary task. We have strengths and weaknesses that make us unique and it is important that we accept our flaws but at the same time try to improve them. Hence, we should refer to our vulnerabilities as opportunities for improvement in order to better ourselves. This has been a constant struggle for me because I find it hard to assess myself. I am glad that I was able to utilize the RNAO Leadership Self-Assessment tool to assess my leadership skills as well as have someone else assess me with it. It allowed me to compare how I rate myself to how they rated me. Based on the assessment tool some of my strengths included empowering my peers, being helpful towards them and communicating effectively. My shortcomings included ineffectively resolving conflicts, and creating a sense of presence and accessibility. Even though we differed on various scores per category we both rated me a one out of five for managing conflicts adequately. This news was not surprising to me as I know I am not the best at resolving conflicts because I would rather just give in than express how I feel or confront an individual at all. To be an exceptional well rounded leader it is imperative that one has a good grasp of conflict resolution strategies because they will inevitably come your way. The purpose of

Conflict is defined as the perception of incompatible goals or actions between two people (McCornack, 2013). How you approach these tense situations greatly affects the outcome of the conflict and your interpersonal relationships. Everyone experiences disagreement at some point in their lives and it is important to know what you bring to conflict situations in order to become a more competent communicator. Therefore, I completed the Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Questionnaire and asked my sister and boyfriend to do the same regarding my conflict style (Introduction to Interpersonal Communication Course Workbook, 2013, p.29-31). I chose these two people to fill out the questionnaire because they both know me very well in two different types

This is a research about conflict which should be considered and resolute during a project. Although, six experts are from different background, there are many sufficient methods to deal with different kind of issues during the working. The great mode has used in the research is Thomas-Kilmann’s conflict mode instrument. (Thomas, K. W., & Kilmann, R. H. ,1974). There are five effective approaches are discussed. Each approaches have its positive and negative effects. Also, there are many problems that each expert should consider about themselves which can devote their effort to help finish the project successfully. Achieving mastery through a comprehensive study of all of these methods can finally bring a huge success to the whole project.