3/13-3/19
As this week is spring break, I think it is a good time to transcribe one of my interviews. I transcribed my first 30 minute interview. To do this, I downloading a free trial of Nvivo. I transcribed the interview by slowing down the audio in Nvivo. I then typed the transcription. I had to replay the audio at least twice to get the correct transcription. After I transcribed the interview once, I went through a second time to ensure I transcribed correctly. It took approximately 1.5 hours to transcribe the interview. “I read this model and it compared it [technology integration] to coffee so you have the standard model which is just plain black coffee and there is one where you add cream and they compare it to like a latte and
…show more content…
I gave a hour presentation in one of my pre-law courses while pursuing my undergraduate degree. One thing I found challenging is how to incorporate these theoretical perspectives into research. I am unsure if the research looks different if it’s conducted using a constructivism approach verses a phenomenological approach. As these two philosophies do not outline a different way of conducting research. I liken the use of these philosophical theories to counseling. A counselor can profuse they use a certain type of therapy: CBT, Psychoanalytic, DBT, and so forth. If this counselor does not use the techniques associated with these theories, then the theoretical perspective does not affect the counseling session. I see research philosophies as a similar paradigm. The processes of collecting data and transcribing has made me reflect on quantitative research verses qualitative. I have only worked with quantitative data, one thing I am being to question are the biases associated with this research. I think one area this is evident is in the research that gets published, only studies with significant findings are published. This can lead to biases when investigating new theories, drugs, and interventions. It is unfortunate that only significant findings are published. Qualitative research does not use significance levels, in this way research may be published that is not published in quantitative research. I think it’s important to remember that both form of research
Qualitative research is flexible written form their results are ongoing and their conclusion can be changed while quantitative research is numerical, reliable, specific, data are collected by statistical analysis due to which quantitative are more accurate. Qualitative research uses open questions to find the depth of the information while quantitative research uses closed question, secondary data or experiments due to this it lacks the depth of the information and neglect the effect of the individuals which could be service provider, service users or other staff members.
This paper primarily concerns qualitative research, but we were asked to compare both qualitative and quantitative methods. During comparison, there are many noted differences in both study designs, but not many similarities. Qualitative research uses a subjective approach with a large sample population. It collects non-statistical data, using an unstructured or semi-structured technique (Nieswiadomy & Bailey, 2018). Quantitative research uses an objective approach and large, random, sampling to ask opinions in a structured way. The findings of quantitative studies are conclusive and used to recommend a final course of action (Nieswiadomy & Bailey, 2018). While it is hard to see similarities between the two, both methods aim to find a solution to a problem or question, the researcher doing the study may affect the outcome and an analysis of the collected data must be done (Souza, 2017). What many don’t realize is the connection amongst the two. You can say, both types of research build upon one another, meaning quantitative studies can quantify results found in qualitative research (Souza, 2017).
Qualitative research data is useful to explain to others the outcome of the information whereas quantitative research is difficult to understand at an initial glance. An advantage to quantitative data is that it is easy for you to turn in to quantitative data, which is more aesthetically pleasing for the audience.
The theoretical foundations of qualitative and quantitative methods are very different, but many researchers believe both methods should be used in the research study to increase validity and reliability.
I am always looking for ways to maximize the use of time. Transcribing a 15 minute interview cost me nearly two hours. This task is not one that I look forward to completing. It is my hope that someone will be able to assist me with the
For quite a while there has been some discussion around which method of distinctions between Qualitative research and quantitative research. This has been fired in later years with some thinking that a combination of the two is best practice especially in social
It is common for researchers to compare qualitative and quantitative research methods. Quantitative methods originate from positivist and post- positivist research paradigms. Also, the methods objectively examine statistical data to determine cause and affect and often use generalizable data. There are various methods used in quantitative research such as surveys,
A qualitative study addresses the complexity of human experience, focusing on the big picture (Rebar & Gersch, 2015); while a quantitative study breaks a problem down into small pieces and focuses on specific parts to see how they all relate (Rebar & Gersch, 2015). Qualitative methods focus on subjective information, and never try to predict or control the phenomenon of interest (Rebar & Gersch, 2015); on the other hand, quantitative methods focus on statistics and objective information, and can yield predictions and control (Rebar & Gersch, 2015).
“Researchers who use quantitative research method seek objectivity through testable hypotheses and carefully designed studies, and gather date that can be reported in numbers and statistics” (Crawford, 2016, p. 66). According to Crawford (2016, p. 66) “conclusions from this study are drawn from statistics and generalized to populations of interest”. Unlike qualitative that helps to eliminate opinions and thoughts, quantitative quantify opinions and thoughts and they obtain results from a larger sampling population. As I had previously stated on my discussion board “Quantitative researcher’s collection methods include many different kinds of surveys for example; online surveys, paper surveys, online polls, face-to-face interviews, telephone interviews, and etc”(myself). “They use the surveys to measure attitudes, behaviors, and opinions” (myself).
General speaking, quantitative research is thought to be objective, however qualitative research often involves a subjective element. There are differences designs in qualitative research in comparison to quantitative research. Qualitative research involves words, pictures, or objects; Quantitative involves data in the form of numbers and statistics.
According to Yin (2011) settled that a qualitative study, the social construction worldwide is usual, while the qualitative depends on the participant’s opinions of the research. Qualitative will focus on interviews and surveys of participants while quantitative will focus on the statistical numbers. Quantitative will use organized research instruments. Qualitative deals more with words while in this study will deal with numbers (Bricki & Green, 2015). Qualitative study criticisms; trials are small, may not represent the broad population, and maybe hard to express in what way the results are unfair by the investigators own feelings (Bricki & Green, 2015). Quantitative research will give a statistical count of the number of teacher mentors on novice teacher self-worth in the classroom versus those without teacher mentors on novice teacher’s self-worth in the classroom. Qualitative will only give small amount of mentor teacher on novice teacher self-worth outcomes in the classroom.
Research paradigms are ‘the entire constellation of beliefs, values, techniques, and so on shared by members of a given community’ (Kuhn, 1970, p.175). The three most common paradigms are positivism, constructivism or interpretivism and pragmatism. Each of these can be categorised further by examining their: ontology, epistemology and methodology. Fundamentally, ontology is the nature of reality, epistemology describes the relationship the investigator has with their version of reality, and methodology is the various techniques and tools used to analysis their research.
There are also some differences between these study designs, which may cause some problems for the inexperienced researcher. “Quantitative research is objective; qualitative research is subjective. Quantitative research seeks explanatory laws; qualitative research aims at
A qualitative researcher is always seeking to understand the world and many times seeking to understand people. The idea that the complexities of the world are too complex for a simple instrument to understand and interpret is not a new notion. “The researcher using qualitative method will argue that another human being (e.g. himself) is the only instrument that is sufficiently complex to comprehend and learn about human existence” (Lave, Jean, Kvale, & Steinar, 1995, p. 1). As the researcher goes through the qualitative research process (designing, interviewing, transcribing, coding, analyzing, verifying, reporting, etc.) it would be ridiculous to ignore the subjective role of the researcher during this process and the importance of that role to the overall study. I have read articles about how in quantitative studies the researcher’s role should be non-existent. Understanding the fundamental differences between quantitative and qualitative studies would clearly indicate why the role of the researcher in qualitative studies cannot be non-existent. Furthermore qualitative research requires the researcher to be the instrument or instruments, it means we must also accept that the researcher is also influencing every other aspect of the study such as who gets interviewed, what gets asked, where is the research site or sites, etc. I actually reject the notion that quantitative studies as a whole are not subjective, which means that I reject that the researcher in
(i) Quantitative vs Qualitative Research: Qualitative research methods is based on values and not numbers while quantitative is based on numeric and Quantifiable data to generalize in its conclusion.