Large Group Interventions at Airbus (p. 329-337)
Directions: Please answer the following questions thoroughly and in complete sentences.
1) What is your analysis and evaluation of the design of this intervention? When analyzing interventions it is important to consider certain criteria. The intervention within Airbus was pertinent to the organizations needs. The ICT workforce had gone through several reorganizations, which left them feeling tired of change and ultimately unable to produce results needed by the company. Donnan utilized an intervention strategy that would result in high performance and results by aligning all parts of the organization’s design (Cummings & Worley, 2015). The intervention, according to Cummings & Worley,
…show more content…
The ICT intervention was aimed at helping the executives “engage a large, critical, and representative segment of the organization” (Cummings & Worley, 2015, p.330). It differed from other methods in that this intervention really began with the executives becoming aligned in order to motivate change within the organization as a whole.
3) Do you believe that the interventions made a difference in this organization? Yes.
If your analysis is positive, what do you think were the critical intervention features that led to success? The specific feature of this intervention that lead to success was the transformation of the executive team, their alignment and commitment to the transformation. Because all executives were on the same page, the change initiatives were easily transferrable to the organization’s members. This resulted in the commitment across the board to sustatin the changes implemented.
4) What do you think of the summit’s agenda and flow? I thought the agenda of the summit was appropriate. The purpose and outcomes were presented first so everyone could understand why the summit was happening. Each day consisted of collaborative activities, question feedback and personal communication. It all catered to the purpose of implementing the ICT vision as one mind and one voice.
5) Do you think the right activities were planned and executed given the objectives of the intervention? Yes. By incorporating the teams of employees from all
Step 2 is forming a powerful guiding coalition. Leadership will have to be on board and on the same page in regards to the change. Kotter and Cohen reveal the core problems people face when leading change. Their main findings are that the central issue concerns not structure or systems but behavior and how to alter it (Farris, 2008). The success of the changes will depend on the ability of the managers to show their commitment to change and motivate the employees to do the same. Without any process to track the implementation, the change can also fail.
It was noted that communication efforts must be verbal and active (Kotter, 1995). Kotter eight step change model has many drawbacks and benefits. The advantages are that it is the step by step, which is easy to follow model. Another is that it does not focus on the change itself, but rather the acceptance and the preparation of this change, which makes it an easy transition. In Kotter’s and Lewin’s models, both consider the difficulties that organizations encounter when trying to move people from their comfort zone for the change to happen. In both of the models they use a different set of calculations to know whether there is any need to change to take place in the
Organizational change is a necessary outcome when considering various scenarios contributing to the resulting vision. Perplexing as it may seem, change initiatives don’t always result in positive outcomes. In fact, many never succeed. As a change agent, one should always have formulated a vision of what change will “look” like for the organization. One would be hard pressed to paint a landscape without having a vision of what the landscape should resemble. Yet, resistance to change usually becomes a significant factor contributing to an initiative’s failure. It is likely an
4) What were the tangible results? How were these results similar to and/or different from the intended results of a consensus organizing
What was the main event that occurred that led to the need for change for this intervention?
In today’s business world, one of the most important contributing factors to the overall success of an organization is the effectiveness of their leadership. Effective leaders carry with them a strong skill set along with a broad knowledge base gained from experience that allows them to effectively and efficiently manage change initiatives. An organization that possessing an effective leadership team is more likely to experience success, especially it comes to creating effective change. The leaders’ role is crucial during a change
Not only were the leaders impressed by the employees insights, they took action to address all of the problems. As a result, participation increased, communication improved, relationship between employees and management improved, and access to training and development opportunities were wide-spread. But most importantly, once the original change initiatives were introduced, employees embraced the initiatives, offered insights on how to improve their outcomes, and ensured their success.
In order to bring about a successful change, it is important to first consider the rationale for change. The organization and people being impacted by the change must understand the desire for change, benefits, and importance of supporting the change. After the change has been embraced and implemented successfully, it is essential for the organization to incorporate it as a standard practice, motivate the personnel to utilize it, and adhere to the change to influence positive
The book The Heart of Change shows the practical side of the theories that are taught in the course textbook. It presents stories of successes and failures based in the application of concepts discussed in Organizational Behavior and Management and in class. Although we talked about several different concepts the ones that are evident in the examples in The Heart Of Change are the more progressive and individual centered approaches. The leadership characteristics that are important to successful change in an organization are those that are espoused in the transformational theory of management. It makes sense that ideals in line with the transformational management theory
• Learning curve has to be steep, i.e. Cost reduction has to be fast with change in technology
The purpose of this paper is to identify findings in published peer reviewed articles that provide research-based guidance in the area of leading organizational change. The content of this paper is focused primarily on the reasons and conditions for organizational change and the implementation of organizational change programs and plans. Limitations of research materials are discussed. Most studies provide an examination of a number of variables influencing organizational change, but are not specifically linked to researched based findings to guidance for organizational change leaders and mangers.
Airbus operates in this industry by building airplanes with seating capacities ranging from 100 to 350 seats. Over the past few years, Airbus has been extremely successful developing airplanes in this size range, increasing its industry market share to approximately 33%. However, quantifying Airbus ' past financial success is difficult because prior to its 1999 1.6 billion euro IPO, Airbus was a private partnership. As a result, very little past financial information is available.
Implementing Organizational Change: Theory into Practice, Third Edition, by Bert Spector. Published by Prentice Hall. Copyright © 2013 by Pearson Education Inc.
The authors were successful on this step by creating a valuable and diverse team that complimented each other, which was a necessity to ensure they had mixed points of views and opinions. Next, the team must create the approach they are going to take, and to be sure each team member has a clear understanding of the benefits for the future of everyone involved. This step was evident by the group meetings. Fourth, it is imperative for the team to demonstrate impeccable communication skills and the ability to influence others to comprehend the significance of the change (Kotter and Rathgeber 2006).
With Airbus continuing to gain market share on Boeing, some available opportunities that are not mentioned in the case study is an expansion into military production. Boeing was the leader of military aircrafts and this would be an open opportunity for Airbus. Airbus eventually entered into the military production in December 2000 with orders for the German Air force. Airbus has the opportunity as well to take the lead on green initiatives, as the world grows ever more concerned about the environment.