According to The Harvard Business Review “An ethical mind broadens respect for others into something more abstract. A person with an ethical mind asks herself, “What kind of a person, worker, and citizen do I want to be? If all workers in my profession adopted the mind-set I have, or if everyone did what I do, what would the world be like?”” (Fryer). I believe I definitely have an ethical mind, ever since I was child I always wondered what kind of overall person I would be and how that would affect others and my character. I always try to be as respectful and morally honest to everyone I come across and every situation in my life. I have actually wondered what if everyone not only in my profession, but in the world had the same mentality …show more content…
A deontologist focuses on doing what is “right”. Like stated above, a lot of my ethical background has come from the characteristics I was taught as a child such as honesty, fairness, and respect for others.
Although I do not have much professional leadership experience, in my personal and what I believe my profession style would be is a coaching approach. “A coaching approach is a high directive-high supportive style. In this approach, the leader focuses communication on both achieving goals and meeting followers’ socioemotional needs (Northouse, 2016, p.94). These types of leaders are approachable, provide personal and professional support, and are friendly. This is the kind of leader I would want to be, efficient in work productivity, but also welcoming and supportive of my employees. This style of leadership builds trust and honesty, which makes employees more likely to present ethical dilemmas to you, because they know the issue will be dealt with in a fair and just manner.
One leadership model that I value is Blake and Mouton’s Managerial (Leadership) Grid. “The Leadership (Managerial) Grid joins concern for productions and concern for people in a model that has two interesting axes” (Northouse, 2016, p.75). The horizontal axis signifies the leader’s concern for production, and the vertical axis signifies the leader’s concern for people. Each side of the grid is drawn to a 9 point scale, in which a 1 stands for minimum concern and a 9 stands for maximum
The moral philosophy and ethical principles that characterize my ethical decisions are based on the honesty and respect, where I believe that people should be honest toward each other’s, and respect others as they would like to be respected. As a future leader I don’t believe in favoritism, for which I could see favoritism at my workplace, and I believe it’s ethically wrong. I believe that each person should do the right things at all the time, and not to finding the excuses about the mistake they make. Each person should be accountable for their
This paper will first discuss briefly what ethics are and provide the definition for an ethical issue. An ethical leadership issue is identified and explained for this author’s practice area. We will then identify and discuss key strategies for leadership that are pertinent to the ethical issue. Next, empirical evidence which supports the strategies discussed will be analyzed. Then, the impact and importance of the strategies will be stated. The final step will be to provide a conclusion to the reader that summarizes the content and strategies.
Leaders are expected to act consistently with their vision and the values they advocate to their team. If a leader’s words or actions are contrary to the values they expect in others, they will be faced with cynicism and contempt. Followers expect their leader to act in their best interests, putting their welfare before their own. An ethical leader is honest, open and truthful to their followers. When leaders lose this trust, their followers will quickly disregard them.
There have been many studies and papers written about leadership by looking at all sorts of perspectives. More recently, researchers have started to look at the keys to leadership from a natural sciences standpoint. The world is starting to understand that our views of leadership in organizations have to be consistent with the nature of the world outside. Richard Wielkiewicz and Stephen Stelzner go so far to say that the key to effective leadership is by looking at and having a fair representation of all perspectives, that includes an environmental perspective. They not only give assertions about leadership as a whole, but they also give criteria for looking at leadership from an ecological standpoint as to better understand it.
The most productive way for a leader to deal with an ethical dilemma is to constantly scrutinize their own feelings and thoughts and to exercise negotiation skills with those who abide by differing values. To practice like this demonstrates to others that the leader is open to listening to others and is agreeable to working together despite diversity.
Leadership theories in and of themselves carry negative and positives characteristics. Within the various theories lie strengths and weaknesses that when applied to complex problems can highlight each one respectively. As I examine a few theories, I will look at the strengths and weaknesses of each and determine when and with which situation would these theories best be utilized. Collective leadership or distributive leadership, and leader-member exchange are both theories that incorporate specific team or group mentalities.
Further, a deontologist would prioritize moral uprightness, and a utilitarian
Leadership comes in different forms and in different aspects of life from private business to government entities (Wren, 1995, p. 5). The models of leadership used are dependent upon the individual attributes of the leaders, for example traits, values, self-identity, skills, and competencies (Yukl, 2013, p. 136). A close look at select leadership models and how they compare and contrast with each other provides insight into the types of leadership that might be employed within organizations as they face various leadership issues and challenges.
According to Horner (1997), "In some cases, leadership has been described as a process, but most theories and research on leadership look at a person to gain understanding." According to Wren (2004), "People found advantages to forming and working together in groups." (p. 6). Classical Leadership started approximately the early 1800 's around the time of the Industrial revolution. The Modernism Era was a new step forward in the studies of management. This model deals with the flexibility in the management.
A leader may exhibit the characteristics of an effective leader such as caring, openness, patience, honesty and trustworthiness, but being aware of ethical considerations is vital. In fact, unethical behavior of the leader derives from being unfamiliar with organizational standards, being incompetent in leading groups or properly
I believe that the Deontologist would come to the same result that an Act Utilitarian would come to, but they would come to the conclusion because of different reasons. Unlike the Utilitarian view a Deontologist does not look at the greatest results for the greatest amount of people, but they would look at the action taking place and judge it moral or not from that. A deontologist
Deontological ethics are based on moral obligations, duties and rights. Rules are to guide decision making in deontological ethics. Deontological ethics have a more individualistic focus, as individuals are supposed to be treated with respect and dignity (Sexty, 2011, 7).
Some of the different leadership styles and approaches that have been discussed, as far as ethical content, are servant leadership, spiritual leadership, and transformational leadership. Servant leadership in known for drawing on the leader’s self- awareness, authentic behavior, positive modeling, conceptual skills, empowering, behaving
Those practicing deontological based ethics are apt to base their decisions off of loyalty and what they believe their duty to be; therefore the choice a deontologist makes is more so based independently with only one option versus the actual consequences of the decision. Taking the aforementioned into consideration, it is quite
In order to be a successful ethical leader there are many activities that can be promoted to encourage ethical behavior in one’s organization. An ethical leader will create programs that endorse integrity in business. Programs can include setting guidelines for dealing with ethical issues, open discussion on ethical issues, and establish a protocol for people to get advice (Yukl, 2010). By establishing programs an ethical leader is really changing and encouraging moral behavior which can affect an organizations work environment and improve moral. By empowering your employees to know how to handle ethical dilemmas you create a new found trust.