Analysis of Transcript Between Piers Morgan and Cheryl Cole

When the twin towers were destroyed in New York City by the terrorist group led by Osama Bin Laden, a Country filled with panic, sadness, and anger was left behind. Thousands of innocent civilians were killed, and the families of the fallen suffered greatly. People demanded answers, and wanted justice. People also felt unsafe, and were unaware if it was reasonable to expect another attack. President George Walker Bush prepares a speech for congress to discuss the events that took place, and the plans that will take place because of these events. The objectives of the speech Bush was trying to accomplish were informing the nation what had happed on September 11th, he then noted that it was not Muslins to be blamed for the attack, the challenges that lie ahead, and our plan for the “War on Terror.” The President uses the canons of rhetoric to execute a speech that met his audience’s needs.

However, most of the interviews that the public saw were conducted by television personalities or reporters, not trained investigators. None of the interviewers appeared to impose cognitive load on Harding. The questions were straightforward and did not pertain to any specific events. Most of the interviewers’ questions pertained to Harding’s personal feelings about the events; fabricating personal emotions is less taxing than verifiable details or time and location specific events (Vrij et al., 2011). The questions asked in interviews were also quite predictable and scripted.

Morgan also showed praise and appreciation through his facial expressions and verbal communications by using words like “wow”. Towards the middle and end part of the interview, a catalytic approach was used as Piers Morgan asked a variety of open questions, encouraging to think, discuss and expand their thoughts in great detail. The interviewer not only asked questions but also listened carefully, nodding, paraphrasing and repeating what Farah talked about.

Williams suggests that due to the deviant lifestyle of his subjects, the cocaine kids, this interviewing stage can delay the time between interviews (1989). That being said, Williams seems to strongly support this method of research because it not only helps him get answers to his questions, but also allows the interview to branch and bring up relevant topic that he had not thought of before. Beyond this, Williams tried his best to understand sub-communications such as the subjects’ body language, including emotions, discreet forms of communication via hand signs, and attire. He did this to ensure he also observed instances that are generally under-the-radar, but still have meaning.

Criticising others takes a great deal of courage, especially when this criticism could reflect upon one’s own work. However, in the introduction of her speech to the Women’s National Press Club, Clare Booth Luce utilizes changes in tone, humor, while appealing to ethos, and pathos to prepare her audience for the impending criticism.

The scenes shown are set up for an interview, a

Comedian Natasha Leggero was booed by the audience on Conan O’Brien’s talk show after she called abortion “cool” and said it was alright to undergo the procedure on every Jewish holiday.

An interview is composed of the interviewer and the respondent. The success of the interview session is dependent on the strategies applied by the interviewer as he or she has the power to influence the response. The level of participation is also one of the factors considered in an interview. In season one of the serial podcast show, the interviewer is Sarah Koenig while the interviewee includes some high school kids. Some of these kid includes; Krista, Aisha, Jenn, Cathy, Saad, Jay, and Adnan Syed.

It’s really not anything. It’s just to let the air in. (…) We’ll be fine afterward. Just like we were before” (pg 639). Although she does seem to struggle with the decision, it isn’t long until she relinquishes her objection, giving him authority over her morality and judgment.

On October 18th, I presented a speech that informed the class about Candace Cameron Bure. The topics that I covered during my speech included Candace Cameron Bure’s early life, TV shows, movies, and personal life. Looking back on my speech, I discovered my strengths, weaknesses, and how to improve my weaknesses into strengths.

I have chosen to look at and analyse a television text. It is a TV drama aimed at a teenage audience called Skins. I chose this particular text as it focuses upon many different characters and scenarios in regards to sexuality and this forms a basis for analysis and evaluation. Skins also focuses upon Teenage sexuality, specifically, which I believe is a broad and interesting subject to analyse with many opportunities to elaborate.

I chose an article from the Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice. The title of the article is False Confessions in Popular Culture. I chose this article because I’ve always been fascinated with criminal interviews. I’ve attended numerous interview and interrogation courses throughout my career. One of the best interview schools I ever attended was Reid interview and interrogation.

She was not ready to talk about this, and Gawain refrained from pushing the matter. He wanted answers and commitments, but it was not fair to demand this of Drea if she needed more time.

As a little girl, I would stand in front of my mother’s mirror, grab the television remote and pretend to deliver a speech before my stuffed animals. There was no question whenever I was asked, “What do you want to be when you grow up?” that I’d quickly respond with, “the president of the United States.” Although that childhood dream quickly diferred, as a college freshman at the age of 19, I would experience an event that may someday be written down in history books because it was not an average event of entertainment in seeing J. Cole perform live at a coliseum or Dwayne Wade in a Miami Heat Jersey at the American Airlines Arena. This was an event that have affected the lives of many and brought about more awareness of the oppression America

The way Edward said all this made him look innocent. The look on his face was distressed and he was uncomfortable. There were other interviews with Edwards fellow inmates. These interviews made them look gentle, thoughtful, intelligent people who believed in Edward’s innocence. Not one interview was with a person that claimed Edward was guilty except the superintendent. This interview was quite short. It took place in a car, so it was noisy which prevented it from having the atmosphere Edward’s interview had. Pictures of Edward made him out to be a kind, loving person who certainly did not deserve to die. The camera showed him playing chess, which indicated he was intelligent. They showed him playing basketball, which indicated he was fit and sporty. And they showed Edward with his family, which indicated he was a loving man who was devoted to his family.