Bending of Beam Lab Report Essay

The goal of the beam project is to design and construct a beam that can hold a given amount of weight without breaking. The beam is required to hold a concentrated load of 375 lbf on the X-axis and 150 lbf on the Y-axis. The maximum allowable weight of the beam is 250 grams. The maximum allowable deflection for the beam is 0.230 in. and 0.200 in. for the X and Y-axis respectively. The beam is required to be 24 in. in length, and it will be tested on a simply supported configuration spanning 21 in. All calculations are to be done under the assumption that the density of basswood is 28 lbm/ft3 and the modulus of elasticity for basswood is 1.46x106 lbm/in2. Given the constraints of a spending cost of $10.50, a maximum beam weight of 250 grams,

In this experiment,we applied Newton`s first law of motion. It descripes the external force as the sum of all external force applied to the object, which equals zero in equilirbium. As we have seen in the experiment, to reach equilibrium all the forces applied on an object shoud cancel each other out and total force reaches zero.Using different forces and weights we were able to reach equilibruim ineach trial of this

Note: the new design is to prevent the bottom face of the beam from bending and further weakening the

The beam-placing operates in two ways depending on where beams are delivered. On one condition, that beams are delivered on the ground level, lifting trolley will pick them up directly by both ends. On the other condition, that beams are delivered at abutment, by two trucks or other carriers at each side, the front trolley will pick up the front end of beams, then the front end of beams will be released from carrier; the front trolley moves forward, simultaneously with another carrier and beams, until the rear end of beams are at the same horizontal position of the rear trolley. The rear trolley will pick up the rear end of beams then, and once again the beams will be released from carrier. After the trolley getting the beams at deck level, the latter will be placed onto the bearings. To be specific on position control, trolleys move along the main girder/ main truss, and at other direction main girder/ main truss and move perpendicularly to span, and vertical position can be handle by trolley themselve by adjusting length of wires.

This report aims to describe the experiment performed to investigate the stiffness of a channel section, and in particular calculate the flexural rigidity (EI) of the beam by two different sets of calculations based on the results gained in the experiment. The EI of an object is used

Deflections of a beam are important to be able predict the amount of deflection for a given loading situation. This experiment addresses determining the yield point for a material to fail, so the stress in the material does not have to reach to that point. This is where understanding beam deflection becomes a useful tool. This experiment is using beam deflection theory to evaluate and compare observed deflection per load values to theoretical values. Beam deflection experiment done by four parts. Part 1 -Simple Supported Bean, part

During the construction, two half-spans being assembled 50 meters above ground level had a misalignment of 4.5 inches or 114mm in camber. It was suggested by John Holland & Constructions to use a kentledge to weigh down the higher section of bridge. It so happened that they had ten, eight tonne concrete blocks on site. These were placed halfway along the higher span to

Abstract: A force table that had three weight hangers, numerous masses and pulleys attached to it, which were used to reach static equilibrium. Third angles for each of the systems were: System 1:349.8, 350.3, 350.1; system 2: 8.3, 9.1 8.8; system 3: 9.8, 10.5, 10.2; system 4: 58.3. 57.5, 58.8; system 5: 48.7, 49.1, 48.1.

a first rigid inclined support member extending downwardly and forwardly from or near the front edge adjacent the cavity of the first horizontal plate or part and forming with the second plate or part at an intermediate position which lies between the front and rear edge

The results of these experiments will depend on many mechanical properties of the material and it is often very common, in order to simplify the mathematical relationships between stresses and strains and improve the interpretation of the responses, to make several assumptions about the material characteristics:

where r_1 is the radius from left side of the beam and r_2 is the radius from the right side.

alter the shape of a loaded member and explain the possible effect of excessive stress on a structural member. Annotated sketches are essential.

The value in the above equation needs to take into account the mass of the spring as well. This mass would be taken be the effective load of the spring. However, this value does not consider the whole spring mass but instead a smaller part of it. This is because the entire spring does not vibrate with the same amplitude as the load. Hence, .

In this experiment a force table is used experimentally to determine the magnitude and direction of a fourth force that is necessary to effect static equilibrium when three known forces act on a light ring. The reliability of the data is investigated, and the experimental values are compared to theoretical values.

The typical stages in the load-deformation behavior of a reinforced concrete simply supported beam are illustrated in Figure 1.