Question 1:
1. Situation Analysis
Brazil is being considered as a growing economy. In fact the country, one of the BRIC nations is seen by analyst of Goldman Sachs as one of the five nations that will be at the top of all nations with regard to a country`s GDP (The Goldman Sachs Group Inc., 2007). To understand Brazil`s current situation and how the country may be able to grow out of this position as a global player in the near future aiming a better globalization of the country by the year 2050, one has to see Brazil within a bigger frame. Within this frame, actions taken have to be integrated into the five obstacles Brazil currently faces.
1.1. The five obstacles Brazil has to overcome (Brazil Cost)
There are five obstacles
…show more content…
The key for an even higher growth rate is to challenge the country`s way of operation. Thus Brazil can be seen as a country of the future. Even though the country has to find its place within the BRIC nations. By comparison with the other nations, it can be seen that Brazil is considered to be the weakest nation. Given the fact that globalization can be seen as the future for every country (Naim, 2009), also Brazil will be able to take a stance of defining the nation`s globalization strategy with a thorough plan of actions.
BRIC nations are defined as becoming the largest economic bloc in the world by 2050. The foundation therefore among other aspects lies in the population of these countries. Brazil has a population of 186 million (in 2006) people. Further can be seen that the human development index (in 2003) can be found at 0.792, which is following Russia the highest index.
In addition should be noted that the latest government practices a democracy steered towards globalization. This democracy as well allowed more privatization. Another way of seeing the ‘global’ Brazil, is by acknowledging Brazil`s major industries regarding its exports.
Seeing these factors as a foundation for Brazil to become an economic leader in the future, the nation still has to work its way there. Hence are there a few issues Brazil has to get a hand on. So is for example the
The economy of Brazil is in the top ten largest economies along with the United States. It is the biggest in Latin America. Actually it is the seventh largest in the world. Brazil has used its newly found economic mechanism to syndicate its outcome in South America and show more of a role in the Global Businesses. The Obama Administration’s National Security Strategy recognizes Brazil as a developing center of effect, and greets the management of the country’s joint and global issues. The United States and Brazil associations mostly have been good in the recent years. But Brazil has other strengthening relations with neighboring countries and expanding ties with nontraditional partners in the South that’s developing.
Brazil’s President, Lula da Silva, talked to Geraldo about how he believes globalization cannot continue because countries need to care for interests of their own people. He says that does not mean closing borders, however. Geraldo does understand this situation, but he sees how French car workers are paid 2000 Euros a month, US employees are paid around a $4000 a month, and Brazil makes around $650 a month. Geraldo also worries about the
NE Brazil has long lagged behind the rest of the country in terms of technology and income. However, economic reforms instituted by Finance Minister Cardoso has seen the
developed in a peripheral country as Brazil was introduced in a large and central market
This case focuses on Brazil's development strategy since World War II and on the change of the economic model following the debt crisis of the 1980s. At the time of the case Brazilian officials are deciding whether regional integration or globalization offer the best route to economic prosperity and development. This case illustrates the challenges that developing countries face in defining trade policy. It also introduces the role of regional trade blocks as an alternative to globalization. At the current time regionalism seems to be very much in vogue and seems to be much more likely to be the basis for future trade system changes than comprehensive trade treaties.
Since 2000, Brazil has significantly improved its economic performance. Strong global demand and high prices for its commodity exports resulting
Finally, Brazilian infrastructure is a major obstacle on the path to development. Brazil is ranked 105th out of 139 countries surveyed in quality of roads; out of the BRIC nations, only Russia is worse. Many of the cost advantages that Brazil enjoys are negated by the high
Stretching over 2,500 miles form east to west and 2,700 miles from north to south, Brazil is the world’s largest tropical country. The only nations that are larger are the lands of Russia, Canada, China and the United States. Brazil has more then 150 million people spread unevenly over its huge land area, making it the fifth most populated country in the world. (Encyclopedia.com) More then two thirds of Brazil’s people live in the cities and towns and more then 29 percent of them are in the ten cities with more then a million people. These include the metropolitan area of Sao Paulo with more then 15 million people and Rio de Janeiro with more then 9 million people. The rural population is mostly concentrated on the East Coast or
Much like the U.S., Brazilian culture is extremely diverse. Brazil’s current population of 190 million represents various nationalities from European to African (Country Facts). Brazil has an extremely diverse culture with some common pervasive threads that grouped together give Brazil a national identity.
BRICS also known as the Big five is a grouping acronym that refers to the countries of Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa that are deemed to all be at a similar stage of newly advanced economic development over the next few decades Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa will become large, powerful players in the world economy. Regardless of their social, political, or environmental challenges, the BRICS will play an ever-increasing role in the world economy, China and India will remain the dominant pair of the five some thanks to their large and increasingly better-educated populations, their low-cost labour, and their increasing openness. The BRICS thesis posits that China and India will become the world's dominant
Brazil 's manufacturing industries are driven by the expansion of the domestic market and a stable internal market.
The BOP of Brazil (exhibit 5) shows that since 2000 the country was constantly a net exporter until 2014. The profile of its exports consists mainly of raw materials such as crude oil, iron, raw sugar, soybeans, etc. The collapse of commodities prices (exhibit 9) in the middle of 2014 reduced the ability of Brazil’s economy to end 2014 with a positive current account. The fall of oil prices also strongly contributed to that and Brazilian economy finished 2014 with a deficit in the Balance of goods of nearly $ 4 billion. Brazil’s GDP as expected finished 2014 with just 0.1% growth, announcing that tough times would follow.
There are many significant change in the world economy occurred, marked by globalization each country has different speed of development under different political and cultural background. During this period, Such as the United States of America 's economic status from the rapid development to the decline, then move to the current stable trend. Brazil, Russia, India, China, which named ‘BRCIS’ those developing countries’ economic performances are very catch the attention in recent years. The decline and rise of these countries ' commercial economy are closely related to their political culture. Therefore, it attracted the attention of scholars and research circles.
The acronym of “BRICS” refers to a group of five emerging economies - Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa which represent nearly 30% of the earth’s surface and 40% of world’s population . BRIC acronym was initially introduced by Chief Economist of Goldman Sachs in his report ‘Building Better Global Economic BRICs’ (2001). In 2010 South Africa was added to this group of countries because of its increasing economy. Goldman Sachs in its long term outlook in 2009 forecasted that BRICs economy will become as big as the G7 countries by 2032 and China’s economy will become as big as the US economy by 2027.
The Washington Consensus was developed by John Williamson as a series of recommended policy reforms, supported by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the US Treasury. It has now become a form of checklist for reforms that are promoted to developing countries in order to achieve certain economic conditions that would arguably make them more likely to experience economic growth and development (Noah Zerbe 2013). The rise of the BRICS countries is a significant topic in the international arena as the previous distinction between the developed and developing worlds was the considerable gap in the levels of economic growth and development experienced by both, however, the BRICS are now argued to be creating a shift in economic power from the North and West, to the South and East of the world (Ikenberry 2011). This is due to the strength of their economic growth and development in the past few decades that have led speculators to argue that the BRICS are laying the groundwork for a new world order (Ikenberry 2011). The focus of this essay will therefore concern whether the BRICS achieved this feat through the implementation of policies recommended by the Washington Consensus, or whether it was due to more unorthodox reforms; with emphasis being placed on the cases of China, Brazil, India, and Russia.