preview

Brooklyn Bus

Decent Essays

In reading the 2011 New York Times article “At Front of Brooklyn Bus, a Clash of Religious and Women’s Rights”, author Christine Haughney brings to light a situation regarding a Brooklyn bus which is most commonly used to transport Hasidic Jews throughout the city, and while the bus is occasionally patronized by those who aren’t of the Jewish faith, traditional rules involving the separation of men and women are expected to be followed by all riders regardless of religious background. Not surprisingly, this is a complicated situation with concerns of religious and gender discrimination for both Jewish patrons and non-Jewish patrons, along with the responsibility of local government to protect and respect all involved. Even while considering …show more content…

Since 1973, New York City has allowed Private Transportation Corporation, the owner of bus B110, to run its bus route through Williamsburg and Burrough Park (Haughney, 2011), which is an area known to have a high population of Hasidic Jews (ujafedny.com, 2013). By allowing a private company to run a public route and collect public income, is New York City encouraging the Hasidic Jewish faith? It could also be suggested that by employing this bus, without another available option, the New York City government is also allowing gender discrimination, because of the requirement that women riders of bus B110 ride only in the back of the bus. This rule could be considered comparable to the requirement of black people riding in the back of the bus prior to the 1956 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that made segregation illegal (thehenryford.org, 2002). Clearly, there are many things to be considered in cases like this one, without an obvious answer that can easily be reached. In which ways can the Brooklyn are consider the needs of local bus patrons, while being sensitive to deeply held religious beliefs of its minority citizens? If the city hired a second bus to run the same route, would this be considered fiscally irresponsible? Or, would it more likely be considered another situation promoting segregation of majority and minority

Get Access