Carpet Baggers Research Paper

Detra, I can relate with you as I am also not a Texan native or know much about Texas government and its history. When I hear about Texas first thoughts that comes to mind is either their love for their football team, bbq, or women’s big hair do’s. That’s what I related to “everything is bigger in Texas” with, however as I have read it also relates to their pride, their state size and their growing population. I also never understood why Texans are extremely proud people then again as I have been reading and as you have mentioned they have had an interesting history and have shown that they will fight for what they believe in no matter the cost.

The people of Texas are diverse and carry their “big can-do attitudes and accents” (Pearson); making Texas a bigger than life state. The political culture of Texas is impacted by two different subgroups of

Historians have found that carpetbaggers in Texas hold a numeral insignificance. This is due to the fact that very few Northerners who arrived after the war ever even held political offices. During the Constitutional Convention of 1868-1869, a mere seven of ninety-three delegates were able to be considered carpetbaggers. In the Republican administration of Governor Edmund J. Davis, Northerners held only the positions of state adjutant general and chief justice of Texas supreme court. Eight out of sixty total district court judges were carpetbaggers. This goes to show that the so-called carpetbaggers weren’t so power hungry after all. At the county level the documented number of northern carpetbaggers was also small. One scholar, Randolph B.

Texas has always been an individualistic state. Since the Alamo to the decision to leave the Union and stubbornly retain traditions, morals, and ideas to this day. After the Civil War, Texas went under radical reconstruction. This was a military rule in which Texas functioned under a military government that made a constitution that made the government more centralized, provided compulsory school attendance, and guaranteed a full range of rights for former slaves. By far, this constitution was a great stride forward in civil rights and made the government more efficient. However, white Southerners were extremely angered by this because of their racist attitudes and stubbornness. When reconstruction ended, white Texans quickly took back the

The multidimensional expression “hillbilly” carries different cultural significances throughout the book Hillbilly Elegy by J.D. Vance. First, Vance utilizes the term “hillbilly” to refer to the working class white Americans of Scots-Irish descent who have no college degree (3). Second, Vance uses the term hillbilly to refer to a group of people from a specific geographic area, namely the area of the Appalachian Mountains. According to Vance, the area stretches from Alabama to Georgia in the South to Ohio to parts of New York in the north (4). Third, hillbilly indicates the way of life, behavior, or identity of the people of Greater Appalachia.

States’ rights, the fight for the unborn and their right to life, and resistance to gun legislation, tend to be some of the top issues for conservative Texas voters. The last time a Democrat carried the state of Texas was in 1976, when Jimmy Carter won the Presidential election. During the 2004 presidential election, then President and Republican candidate, George W. Bush, won with 61.09% against 38.30% votes for the Democratic candidate John Kerry. However, in the more recent Presidential elections that were held in 2008 and in 2012, the very popular Democratic candidate, Barack Obama, did not win the majority vote for Texas. Thus, looking at this information, it can be said that the state of Texas tends to lean more towards the Republican side.

Even after the defeat of the Mexican army at San Jacinto, Texans faced as uncertain a future as that which they experienced during the revolution. In this context, the myths that were created during this period offered means for understanding certain events of the past and connecting these events to their conceptualization of the world around them. Furthermore, the placing events that describe the beginnings of Texas in narrative form included value judgements that assigned meaning to the occurrences. Over the years, the rhetorical myths about Texas were told and retold until characters and incidents that did not exist in 1836, replace those that did and saturate contemporary conceptualization of the state and its people. It is the shelf-life of Texas mythology that is perhaps the most impressive and confounding characteristic of the state’s cultural identity. The heroic legacy of the Alamo defenders, if not all those who participated in Texas’ revolutionary past, assume a place of reverence in the imagination of modern Texans, and in particular, Anglo-Texans whose uncritical acceptance of the state’s heroic mythology exhibits a resilience of mythic proportion – even when confronted with overwhelming evidence to

Texas wanted independence and to become a free state but Mexico would not let them so the U.S annexed Texas. Texians didn’t obey the rules of the Mexican government because they could not learn Spanish due to the government not giving them resources to learn it. This shows Mexico caused Texans to leave. Santa Anna ripped the Mexican constitution and the Texans believed the Mexican government was

People loved Texas so much that they only would enlist for Texas war service (Doc D). Every texan enjoyed Texas’ beautiful sites and weather. Some say if they ever were to marry, it would only be in Texas (Doc D). Many people who lived in the Lone Star State owned slaves, and didn’t want to get rid of them (Doc D). So, many of the Texans fought in the war so they would be able to have to ability to continue to own slaves. Texans had such a meaningful place in their heart for Texas, that they thought they owed it to their state to fight for what they thought was

Lamar's tendency to discourage thoughts of annexation with the United States certainly did not help Texas at the time. Even worse, his impassioned hatred of Native Americans had disastrously impecunious outcomes on the republic's financial affairs. What victories that Lamar gained against the various wars and battles he fought against a plethora of Native American tribes were somewhat pyrrhic, as during the process the Republic increased its debt nearly seven times, primarily due to military spending.

From the Reconstruction to 1990s, the Democratic Party has dominated the Texas politics, that is about 100 years. At the end of the nineteenth century, the two main political parties had renewed competition. In 1896’s election and 1898’s election, Republican elected members of Congress lost a number of voters,

Another Ex: Christopher Columbus Bowen (SC): best resembles the conservative stereoptye. Born in RI, he moved to Ge where he made his living as a card dealer. He joined the confederate army. Courtmarshalled and jailed in Charleston but was freed when the Union army occupied the city in 1865. In 1868, he was jailed again for alledgedly embezzling money from the freedmen. Acquited in 1872 on a bigomy charge. Pardoned by President Grant. Served two terms in the national house of reps.

Texas is a state that has always been recognized for its size and politics. Elections are a huge part of democratic societies that are intended for citizens to choose their public leaders and approve the policies set by candidates. Political parties and interest groups also play a key role in shaping opportunities for public participation. Most Texans and historians know that the Democratic Party’s historical dominance is important to state politics. It is less likely that people are not aware of the consequences of the one-party system for public participation and democracy in Texas. Like many of the rim South states, the white elitist belonged to the Democratic Party which stemmed from the end of Reconstruction until the late 20th

Texas has been a one-party state for nearly a century. Despite substantial changes in many areas throughout history, Texas’ political culture is one area that has remained rather steady. Looking back as far as the post-civil war, until the late 1970’s Texas was considered a majority Democratic state. After a century of post-reconstruction, the Democratic Party were the victors of electoral dominance in all levels of state government and in Texas’ representation in the national government as well (Edsall). Texas’ social and economic make up was primarily rural and agricultural, which influenced the political agenda. Through immigration attracted by the promise of a stable future in the oil and natural gas industries,

The book The Classic Slum: Salford Life in the First Quarter of the Century by Robert Roberts gives an honest account of a village in Manchester in the first 25 years of the 20th century. The title is a reference to a description used by Friedrich Engels to describe the area in his book Conditions of the Working Class. The University of Manchester Press first published Roberts' book in the year 1971. The more recent publication by Penguin Books contains 254 pages, including the appendices. The author gives a firsthand description of the extreme poverty that gripped the area in which he grew up. His unique perspective allows him to accurately describe the self-imposed caste system, the causes and effects of widespread poverty, and the