Mass Murderers and Serial Killers are nothing new to today’s society. These vicious killers are are generally vicious, fierce beasts and have an unusual inclination to murder. The questions that people ask about serial killers and mass murderers are what gives these people the desire to kill? What inspires them to continue murdering? Do these killers get fulfillment from slaughtering? Is there a contrast between mass murderers and serial killers or would people say they are the same? How do they pick their victims and what are some of their characteristics? This paper will highlight the answers to these questions and give a better insight of what goes on in the minds of mass murderers and serial killers.
The two news articles I chose talks …show more content…
He opened fire from the 32nd floor of the Mandalay Bay hotel into a crowd of about 22,000 concertgoers where he killed 8 people and wounded nearly 500. Stephen Craig Paddock died of a self-inflicted gunshot after he shot up the country music festival. Before the shooting, the police did not know who Stephen Paddock was and they believed that he acted alone. Authorities say that Paddock has purchased firearms in the past but they believed that he purchased the firearms used in the crime legally. A Mesquite store, Guns & Guitars, said it sold a gun to Paddock and that "he never gave any indication or reason to believe he was unstable or unfit at any time." Paddock’s brother, Eric Paddock, said that his brother was “just a guy,” an ‘army of one” with no known children despite a string of relationships. Someone you might see nursing a drink alone at a bar. Someone who went on cruises and played $100-a-hand video poker. Someone who sent boxes of cookies to his mother.
The journal article I chose talked about the comparisons and differences between mass murderers and serial killers. Mass murderers and serial killers are nothing new to today’s society. Serial killers are usually males, their killings are typically a stranger-perpetrated crime, and their locations of killings are usually familiar to them. Many serial killers are exceptionally skillful in their
Click here to unlock this and over one million essaysGet Access
Childhood Characteristic of Serial killers The basic definition of Serial Killers are that it is a group of people who’s work is just to kill, kill and kill innocent people over a longer period of time without being wedged or bunged. They are not like mass murderers, who may kill many people at one time - majority of the time because of circumstantial behavior. Serial Killers are completely a different from traditional or mass murderers they always make a proper plan and they are very specific in choosing thee victims and they are mobile Serial killers are a true threat to today’s society. There choice of victims can be anyone I can be some adolescents or an old aged person, prostitutes. The worrying matter is that these serial killers are keeps on playing with the life & death game with innocent people until they are stopped. Nobody in this world is a born killer. All these serial killers and dangerous killers are born as a normal person. But due to some incident or situation they convert from normal person to a dangerous serial killers and start killing people as they don’t value human life. Long time ago people just scared from these killers but after some time they start knowing them and start analyzing. This all happens when police allow the researchers and authorities to come and talk to these dangerous people and get the chance to know them. In this way both the sides get the chance to know each others people get the chance to know about the killers and there
The following paper discusses the intricate differences between a mass murderer and a serial killer. The discussion of the mass murderer and the serial killer is backed up with three points in which significant differences are depicted, the intention, the experiences in the earlier stages of life and mass media. The three points will follow the ideals behind the murders and where that spark appear in a murderer’s life. The mass murderer will be depicted in the media and shown as being something influential, especially in the United States. The analysis of the three points will be backed up with two case studies done by Elliot Leyton in his novel, Hunting Humans. The two cases that will back up the thesis statement of intention,
In the past decade, Americans and researchers have given more and more of their attention to serial killers. The United States alone has contributed about 85% of the world's serial killers. It has been said that they come in many different forms. Society has many words for serial killers. Holmes and DeBurger define serial murders as "consisting of repetitive killings which are one-on-one with rare exception, where the relationship between victims and the offender is that of a stranger or slight acquaintance, and the motivation to kill and apparent motives are lacking." (Serial
This week I learned about different types of murders and murderers. I was especially interested in the various differences and similarities between mass murderers and serial killers. For example, mass murderers and serial killers have the same minimum number of victims, however the demographics of the victims are generally very different. A lot of the time we group mass and serial murderers together as deranged or even individuals but after delving deeper there are many general differences between mass and serial murderers including psychopathology, motives and choice of weapon(s).
We have added many different classifications to murder and even legally degrees of murder in escalating scales of what we deem to be more horrible. Extreme Killing demonstrates that intentions, means, and mental states are terrifically vital components when attempting to comprehend the dynamics connected with these crimes. This book clearly takes readers into a world that most people would rather ignore. This book is anything but difficult to read and will speak to students, experts, and researchers, alike. Anyone choosing to read this book ought to know about its realistic and at times shocking nature. Moreover, readers may and will justifiably feel as though they are getting an off camera look at the people and events involved. This content is alluring, enlightening and elegantly composed. It is maybe the most extensive content accessible on the subject of serial, mass and spree
In Extreme Killing: Understanding Serial and Mass Murder, prestigious specialists James Alan Fox and Jack Levin inspect the speculations of criminal conduct and apply them to a huge number of well and lesser-known cases from around the globe. Fox and Levin draw upon exploration from two extensive information sets - one contained serial killers and the other of the individuals who have committed massacres.
The term itself: serial killer, has so many connotations. Serial killers are very prevalent in today’s society, and are present in tv shows, books, movies, magazines. The public has formed an idea of serial killers that is not exactly all too correct. The general public’s idea of them is very broad, when in actuality serial killer’s come in many, many different shapes and forms. The world of a serial kiler has such a diverse group of people taht just a single, general idea of one doesn’t begin to cover all the traits and aspects. Their motivations are a vast range of reasons, some completely beyond comprehension. The recognition of the idea “serial killer” has not come about until the last century or so. Killers from hundreds of years ago didn’t have the resources that ones nowadays have available to them, to be successful in their crimes. The awareness is increasing, but at the same time, killers are becoming quicker than us. Finding ways to beat the system, because most of us can’t even process their crimes on a moral level. In fact, the average number of serial murders that occur reach decade has increased since 1960. In defining the term, it’s necessary that we look at what the minimum number of victims is in “serial”. Three victims is classified as the minimum when we talk about serial murder. Every serial killer’s drive to kill is different, and could be based on mental illness, or sociopathic or psychopathic tendencies.
Serial Killers are a product of their environment rather than result of the genes they were born with. Parental and peer abuse is the main contributing factor in the shaping of a serial killer. Serial killer traits can range from physical abuse to bed wetting in the adolescence stage of their lives. During the adolescence stage the abuse can make more of an impact on the molding of the serial killers personality. Modern serial killers are a product of their environment; factors such as; physical and sexual abuse, bad parenting, and poor education made them become the modern physcopathic killers of their time.
For my upcoming research paper, I intend to write on serial killers. The psychological factors that motive an individual to commit serial killings has long fascinated psychologist and criminal profilers. Research into criminal behavior has shown that there is a multitude of factors that go into the creation of criminal behaviors. According to the textbook, “there is no single identifiable causal factor in the development of a serial killer” (Bartol & Bartol, 2016, p. 303). To me the absence of a single causal factor, causes serial killers to be fascinating. What is most fascinating is the absence of serious mental disorder, that could be used to identify potential serial killers. I feel like this topic needs further research to better understand
The attributes of a person 's Geographical location, neurological differences and biological disparities, contribute to them becoming a Serial Killer. Such as whether a person is a male or female. Also, people who suffer from neurological disabilities such as psychopathy are at more of a risk. Then people who live in the United States of America (USA) are statistically more likely to become a serial killer. There are many factors that can drive a person to become a serial killer. But what we do know is that not everyone can become a serial killer. It’s takes a specific type of person to commit these crimes and they are different in a magnitude of ways from a normal person.
A serial killer is a person who murders three or more people, this type of crime turns into highly covered stories by the media. The manner in which newspapers cover aspects of the crime have similarities and differences. More specifically, the three articles that will be discuss explore three serial killers and the manner in which they conducted their crimes, these are “17 Killed, and a Life is Searched for Clues” by James Barron from The New York Times, “Unintended result: Gacy probe clears 11 unrelated cold cases” by Sharon Cohen from The Chicago Tribune, and “Worst serial killer in history, who fed prostitutes to pigs, sparks rage by publishing book” by Michael E. Miller from The Washington Post.
In the past two decades, the creature known as the serial killer has captured the attention of the American culture. With the dozens of books and movies centered around serial killers the term has become a trendy catch phrase, replacing earlier terms such as "homicidal maniac". Fiction and screenwriters use the term "serial killers" with such casual abandon that is seems the meaning of the term escapes them.
When defining a serial killer many people tend to confuse the various forms of killers with this very popular and highly glorified category. From movies, to books, and everything in between this category makes for a very gruesome and yet interesting view into the human mind and its works better than any of the other forms of murder.
When an individual is provided with an image of what a motivated is serial killer is, there was always a vision of a man who was a loaner. However, the diversity of serial killers continues to be expanded especially as science and psychological approaches are created towards understanding the mind of these killers. However, female serial killers have become a rarer source of violence and disregard for human life especially after psychology has deemed it that men are much more aggressive in regard to killing and murdering. This of course does not neglect ideas that serial killers do exist and have done so for a tremendous amount of time. However, the characteristics of a female Serial killers are dramatically different than that of a male. Female serial killers are much more focused on their victim and usually create a level of emotional attachment. In many of these situations, serial killers are highly organized and can have a mixed bag of emotional attachment towards the victims. Female serial killers are connected to the victims and may have a mixture of organize and disorganized approaches (Harrison et al., 2015). Therefore, it is critical to look at the motive of a serial killer and its possible biological and sociological understandings of how serial killers are created within the female mind.
Before we can take on the definitions of serial murder and mass murder, we must first understand what exactly constitutes murder. According to the United States Code-section 1111, murder is defined as the unlawful killing of a human being with malice aforethought (4). With that said, according to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the term serial murder implies that there are at least three different murder events at three different locations, with a “cooling off” period between each event (Ramsland, 2009). Individuals who perpetrate the crime of serial murder are referred to as serial killers. The term “serial killer” was coined in the mid-1970s by Robert Ressler, the former director of the FBI 's Violent Criminal Apprehension Program. He chose the name “serial killer” because authorities in England called these types of murders “crimes in a series” (Freeman, 2007). John Wayne Gacy, known as the “Killer Clown,” who tortured, raped and murdered 33 men between 1972 and 1978 is an example of a serial killer. On the other hand, mass murder is defined as four or more murders occurring during a particular event with no cooling-off period between the murders. A mass murder typically occurs in a single location in which a number of victims are killed by an individual (2). An example of a mass murder would be the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing perpetrated by Timothy McVeigh, in which 168 people were killed. While serial murder has a definition that contains certain