Introduction
Every day people are introduced to the Bible, whether it be through Christians or non-
Christians. Christians will try to convince people that the Bible is true, while non-Christians will
say that there are too many inaccuracies in the Bible for it to be true. As Christians, we should
take a look at what the other side has to say, so we are aware of what others believe and so that
we can accurately talk about the other side’s claims. Another reason that Christians should
conduct their own research on the accuracy is so they can defend their faith and know why they
believe what they believe. There are many people in our would today that believe certain facts
and information to be true only because friends or family
…show more content…
The key difference in the two accounts are that one took place on a mountain,
while the other took place on a plain. The location of the Sermon on the Mount does not mean
that the Gospels are inaccurate, but rather that Jesus may have given similar sermons at different
times. That would explain why there is two different accounts, but Matthew’s account gives its
readers more details. One proposal that would explain some of the differences is that each
Gospel writer is writing from their own perspective and is not writing to give us a detailed
comprehensive account, but rather a glimpse into the life of Christ. Another thing to consider is
that Matthew would have been right with Jesus because Matthew was one of His disciples, but
Luke would have been writing from another person’s account. That does not mean that Luke’s version is inaccurate, but rather that his version could vary slightly because it does not come
from his personal testimony, but rather a friend. When dealing with the Sermon on the Mount the
most logical conclusion is that Jesus gave this message on numerous occasions, but possibly
gave a more detailed sermon on the mountain.
The other instance that proves that the Gospels are reliable is all the instances
…show more content…
This account was an early example that shows us that even before Jesus came, God the
Father performed miracles. Through research Dr. Gary Habermas, a scholar in New Testament
history and has conducted lots of research for providing sound evidence to support the New
Testament, discovered that many agree and recognize Jesus’ miracles dealing with healings and
exorcisms, but deny the nature miracles. The fact that Jesus’ miracles are listed and discussed
in each of the Gospels show proof that Jesus really did perform miracles. Dr. Gary Habermas
stated, “medical studies of certain ‘miraculous’ phenomena today indicate that we are still not
able to account for all such incident in purely naturalistic terms.” That statement from Dr.
Habermas shows that one cannot account for the miracles through naturalistic elements, but rather have to acknowledge that Jesus really did perform miracles. Dr. Gary Habermas is not the
only person that has looked into the miracles of Jesus. Craig Keener, a professor of New
Testament at Ashbury Theological Seminary, has also provided evidence through Jesus’ miracles
that prove the accuracy of the
When looking in the Gospel of Matthew 15:21-28 and the Gospel of Mark 7:24-30 one can find that each of these pieces of their respective gospels have both some similarities and differences. There is evidence of overlap between these two which are quite easy to find whilst one is reading the sections of each. There also are points in which these two accounts diverge from one another by either telling a certain part of the other gospel in a different way, removing content from one of the other gospels, or adding something that may not have been referenced or described in the other. Either way these accounts from Matthew and Mark both have connections to each other even if not visible on the surface.
2. There were two types of miracles that Jesus performed. One of the types is spiritual miracles. These were the things Jesus did that involved spiritual matters, such as when He cast out demons in Mark 5:1-13, and whenever He forgave someone's sins, like in Luke 7: 11-17. The other type was physical miracles. These were His physical doings, like in Matthew 8:5-13 where He healed illnesses in people. When Jesus calmed the storm in Mark 4:35-41, and when He raised the dead in Luke 11:17, those things were physical miracles.
The next sign miracle was another demonstration of his ability to heal. Jesus healed a man born blind. This healing prompted a similar reaction from the Pharisees and the Jews that healing the lame man did; although, in this instance it was not done in violation of the Sabbath day. This was the first time Jesus had admitted openly that illness or affliction have been placed on someone for the sole purpose of revealing God’s glory.
The miracle of curing a blind man gives shows the skepticism of the masses towards the new religion that was being founded. This miracle takes multiple attempts and when completed gives the man complete vision. However; Jesus tells the man to not return to the village that he had come. The texts surrounding these verses have this similar theme of ‘silent’ miracles. The part that sparks my interest is showing what people thought about Jesus at this time. I think showing that the miracle took two attempts shows that people were skeptical about this
Miracles are significant to the believability of the Bible in many aspects. Christianity is based upon the belief in certain miraculous events as fact. There would be no believing in Jesus, without believing in miracles. On one hand, miracles are easy to criticize because nobody can present a miracle with authority like Jesus Christ. But on the other hand, miracles are easy to confirm when they are properly justified to be the purposeful actions of God.
I love this scripture, John 4:43-54. This scripture shows how the sign of Jesus miracles can indirectly heal a person. With the official's faith in Jesus' miraculous power, he wanted Jesus to go with him to heal his dying son. Jesus told him to depart for home because his son was already healed. By believing and having faith, the official took Jesus by his word and his son was miraculously healed immediately. Not only his son was healed, because of his belief and faith in the power of God, but his whole household also became
Historians use the accounts of other people in Jesus’ time to relate to his life.
Additionally, John indicates most of Jesus works in Galilee and Jerusalem while synoptic gospels place it in Galilee and Judea. Jesus’ teachings in the four gospels were mainly in parables and there is account of Jesus speaking with any figure. In contrast gospel of John accounts that Jesus used philosophical speeches in his teachings and interacted with figures like Nicodemus. Another event that distance gospel of
By this point you may have noticed that I believe that miracles are a real thing. In fact, I know that they are. Yet, there are some people — especially here in the so-called “Western” world (which I prefer to call the minority world) — who deny that miracles occur. Let me briefly discuss this claim.
determine whether it is historically accurate or disprove it in the same way? Biblical Historian
historical data. The fact that the Bible has stood the test of time and has not been
They made to feel that they were even isolated from God. Leprosy also meant a total loss of your way to life. You had been left to die. Which brings us to the final effect of a diagnosis of leprosy, you are dying, a slow and horrible death.
Every miracle that Jesus performed was unique. I think that in today’s Gospel we can hear one of the most interesting miracles that Jesus performed. Mark tells us the story of Jesus healing the deaf man who had a speech problem. Jesus’ compassion is so great that when the man approaches him, He takes the man aside and heals him. And this is the first thing that can be very surprising and unique. But why does Jesus take the deaf man off by himself away from the crowd? It seems that it would be more effective to cure somebody in the presence of others. In this case everyone would be able to see and believe that Jesus Christ is the Messiah, that He is one who is sent from God, that He has divine power. But we see that Jesus thinks in very different way. For him it’s not so important human effectiveness but true and dense encounter with a person. The Lord wants to be alone with him, away from the noise and activity of the crowd. He wants to be able to communicate with him in
What are miracles? Who would be able to do these miracles? “A miracle is an