preview

Christian Inaccuracies In The Bible

Decent Essays

Introduction

Every day people are introduced to the Bible, whether it be through Christians or non-

Christians. Christians will try to convince people that the Bible is true, while non-Christians will

say that there are too many inaccuracies in the Bible for it to be true. As Christians, we should

take a look at what the other side has to say, so we are aware of what others believe and so that

we can accurately talk about the other side’s claims. Another reason that Christians should

conduct their own research on the accuracy is so they can defend their faith and know why they

believe what they believe. There are many people in our would today that believe certain facts

and information to be true only because friends or family …show more content…

The key difference in the two accounts are that one took place on a mountain,

while the other took place on a plain. The location of the Sermon on the Mount does not mean

that the Gospels are inaccurate, but rather that Jesus may have given similar sermons at different

times. That would explain why there is two different accounts, but Matthew’s account gives its

readers more details. One proposal that would explain some of the differences is that each

Gospel writer is writing from their own perspective and is not writing to give us a detailed

comprehensive account, but rather a glimpse into the life of Christ. Another thing to consider is

that Matthew would have been right with Jesus because Matthew was one of His disciples, but

Luke would have been writing from another person’s account. That does not mean that Luke’s version is inaccurate, but rather that his version could vary slightly because it does not come

from his personal testimony, but rather a friend. When dealing with the Sermon on the Mount the

most logical conclusion is that Jesus gave this message on numerous occasions, but possibly

gave a more detailed sermon on the mountain.

The other instance that proves that the Gospels are reliable is all the instances …show more content…

This account was an early example that shows us that even before Jesus came, God the

Father performed miracles. Through research Dr. Gary Habermas, a scholar in New Testament

history and has conducted lots of research for providing sound evidence to support the New

Testament, discovered that many agree and recognize Jesus’ miracles dealing with healings and

exorcisms, but deny the nature miracles. The fact that Jesus’ miracles are listed and discussed

in each of the Gospels show proof that Jesus really did perform miracles. Dr. Gary Habermas

stated, “medical studies of certain ‘miraculous’ phenomena today indicate that we are still not

able to account for all such incident in purely naturalistic terms.” That statement from Dr.

Habermas shows that one cannot account for the miracles through naturalistic elements, but rather have to acknowledge that Jesus really did perform miracles. Dr. Gary Habermas is not the

only person that has looked into the miracles of Jesus. Craig Keener, a professor of New

Testament at Ashbury Theological Seminary, has also provided evidence through Jesus’ miracles

that prove the accuracy of the

Get Access