Introduction Global companies require the alignment of their employees and partners not only on the strategy itself but also on the values needed to make that strategy successful. Values reflect and shape corporate culture. A shift in strategy often requires a shift in values. The Coca - Cola Company is no different. When the company had a shift in their strategy of “Open Happiness” to “Taste the Feeling” the company had to shift their values to fit it. Coca-Cola’s Major Strategic Shift The shift in Coca-Cola’s strategy is centered on the fact that the company has only been focused on the brand and not the actual product in past years (Advertising Age, 2016). The shift from “Open Happiness” to “Taste the Feeling” will turn that focus …show more content…
One day they might want this or want that, so a company like Coca- Cola has to keep up with the times to stay competitive. Taste is everything. Older consumers expect traditional tastes from Coca-Cola. While on the other hand younger consumers who aren’t familiar with how Coca-Cola traditionally tasted, want variety. It was time for a change and the new era of Coca-Cola will bring a taste that will be for everyone. Everyone must get a chance to enjoy Coke but in their own way. This is where the one brand with several varieties comes in. The one brand which provides something for everyone no matter their taste. Impacting its HR Strategy This shift in Coca-Cola’s strategy will have a major impact on their HR strategy. Their HR strategy will also have to shift. This is because all aspects of the organization will have to align with the company’s mission, vision and values. Therefore, HR will have to look ahead at where the organization is going, understand trends and forces that help shape the business for the future and quickly prepare for what’s to come (Coca-Cola’s Mission, Vision and Values, 2017). When one part of the company makes changes the other parts have to adjust to align with the change. In order for a company to have an effective HR strategy, it must provide the company with a roadmap for creating value through the company’s workforce (Creating value through HR HR Strategy, 2017). The workforce must be chosen with the overall
Message strategy – “Good really wins in the end.” This is in some respects a rather odd “big idea.” Contrast this with the early Coca-Cola campaigns that focused on the benefit of refreshment, something that is very relevant to the functional utility of the product. However, nowadays, that is not enough. For many years, there have been numerous alternatives that satisfy the need for quenching thirst. This big idea falls in line with that of more recent campaigns. That is, it drives home an emotional benefit rather than a functional one.
The next stage is a stage of providing the actual change actions. Here, the company has chosen a new CEO and President, Douglas Daft, who was an opposite of Ivestor. Daft was a delegator, who wanted to turn Coca-Cola to a most desired company by employees in the world. He also saw a company as a head of the class, when speaking about diversity of workforce and business. Daft was fast in his actions. He has put Ware on the position of Vice-President for Global Public Affairs, as he was concerned about diversity issues in the company as well. They applied Ware’s suggestions about supporting the diversity from the top-executives and tying compensation increases to the achievement of diversity goals. On this stage, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia approved the Settlement Agreement, which was used to non-hourly U.S.-based workers of the company, excluding its bottlers and called for pay-back to employees, future pay equity and equal employment opportunity. Task Force was created to provide an independent supervision of company’s compliance and was reporting on implementation of these programs. On this stage, Coca-Cola learned a lot about its past mistakes and provided dozens of changes to its policies and procedures. As it is not possible to change a whole organization in a short-time period, Coca-Cola was implementing changes during the next decade after a lawsuit and even created a document, called “Manifesto of
Coca-Cola, as the leading brand in the world, has the highest position in soft drink industry. Its outstanding product “Coke” has been won the heart of everyone. However, in this case, we realize that they had a failed attempt at introducing the new product called New Coke in 1985.
Does Coca-Cola allow various factors to influence the decision-making process? There are different strategy levels striving to meet or exceed overall corporate strategies within Coca-Cola. This essay will discuss functional, stability, competitive versus cooperative, trade offs, and retrenchment strategies. It will also provide examples or advantages and disadvantages the company utilizes at a corporate strategic management for tailor logical portfolio decision changes when warranted. Leading off with the first topic of this discussion, what is a functional strategy and can it affect decision-making?
Coca Cola was focused on the globalization of its brand. Coca Cola has the widest variety in the beverage industry comprising of around 3300 products and it exists in almost 200 countries. Coca Cola has a global brand value and loyalty as compared to
Most Coke products satisfy entirely age groups as it is proven that most people of different age groups drink the Coca Cola product. This market is comparatively large and is open to both genders, thereby letting greater product diversification.
The Coca-Cola Bottling Company holds true to their values and strategy, thus creating more value within their brand. Business level strategy implements new products that embodies a fun and sociable atmosphere amongst family members and friends. This ambitious quality in a company is what pushes them past the threshold of complacency to move their product. One way they were able manage their brand globally was by using intense advertisements. Adding to their already famous and highly desired beverage, a business level strategy was instituted to add flavors to their cola product. By adding Cherry Coke and Vanilla Coke to their products, they satisfied the taste buds of millions upon millions of consumers here and abroad. Having the corporate level strategy makes the corporation thrive in the global market. It is also viewed as staying relevant or competitive, by developing more products that would best serve everyone who enjoys their product.
Coca Cola has differentiated its product and services that are valued by its customer. Its product are based on customer’s preferences, with affordable price and made easily accessible.
The Coca Cola company is perceived to be the most famous trademark on the globe, and it is equally so. The company claims more than 400 brands that appeal to a wide range of individuals throughout the world. They are in a position to fulfill needs of every one of their buyers making their experience with their beverages a better one. The entity’s drinks entice a lot of people across all races, age, and gender. Coca Cola is outstanding for its overall popularity as its items are sold in over four hundred countries in the world, while major contenders like Pepsi are just available in very few countries. Such a competitive advantage has placed
Coca-Cola’s customer segments meet the needs of every age and every lifestyle. They provide a variety of products from different flavored sodas to soy based drinks. They have a drink that targets every age group. For kids and adults, they have
Another important weakness is that the company’s products are seen as a major cause of obesity. (Melser, 2013) The beverage sales are affected by various factors including change in trends and preferences. Recently, beverage sales have fallen because of people’s increased preference for the health drinks. Around the world, obesity is a major problem and the Coca Cola products are seen as a major cause of obesity. As people are getting health conscious they are moving towards low calorie healthy drinks. This affects coca cola’s profitability and popularity. However, the brand can overcome this situation by increasing the number of low calorie products in its brand portfolio. It will need to add more healthy choices for its customers in its product portfolio.
The Coca-Cola Company is the world’s leading beverage company, with markets in over 200 countries and over 1,100 brands under their portfolio. The company was founded in 1886 and is currently headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, USA. This paper seeks to explain the impact of globalization on the standardization versus adaptation decision using examples from the Coca-Cola Company’s performance and strategies since their inception as a company.
Coca-Cola believes and implements that open communication is the key to effectively solicit and leverage innovative ideas amongst its workforce. For example, global associates and bottling partners have contributed ideas to major initiatives, such as the 2008 Beijing Summer Olympic Games activation. Employee input has been a key ingredient to the Company 's Mission, Vision & Values. Another example of Coca-Cola’s regular dialogue with their associates is their global Employee Insights Survey. In 2010, the results of the global Employee Insights Survey showed improvement across almost all survey categories, including an 84% associate engagement score -- a two- point increase over 2008.
Coca-Cola has been around for generations with the same iconic taste, logo and symbolism. Its brand has represented family and the memories of good times, celebrations and comfort of being with those we love. Unfortunately, the company has not made good marketing decisions in the recent past and has lost relevancy. The purpose of this essay is to assess the conditions that created Coca-Colas marketing problems, evaluate the future of healthy beverages and non-carb drink brand extensions, and provide recommendations to the management.
Also, Coca-Cola has very strong rivalries. The main one is of course PepsiCo, which is very famous all over the world and has a great variety of products. Thus, Coca-cola can’t afford its image to be damaged because if that happens PepsiCo will become the leader of the industry very fast. Right now Coca-Cola needs a new Strategic Communication Plan to try to overcome the issues.