The Break-Up in summary is a movie about a couple, Gary and Brook, who break up after dating for 2 years. The couple live together in a Boston condo. The first instance of the couple’s dysfunction is when Gary came home from work one day and Brook asked him to do few things to help her before a family dinner party that was going to arrive in 20 minutes. This then proceed to turn into several arguments throughout the night. As a result, of a heat of moment action, Brook says she’s done with the relationship (for further details please refer to the video clips from the presentation). The rest of the movie is about Brook trying to get Gary see that she didn’t want to break up; that what she had said about being “done” was not true. Therefore, Brook tried to create situations that would make Gary jealous, but instead actually drove them further apart. The largest issue in Gary’s and Brook’s relationship was the communication, or lack thereof, and for this reason a couple’s approach to cognitive behavioral therapy would have benefited for their relationship. A couple’s approach to cognitive behavioral therapy would have been best because it is a direct therapeutic approach that would have assisted Gary and Brook in changing the way they think and thus would change how they feel toward each …show more content…
I would ask questions such as, “what is the reason you two have decided to come to therapy?”, “what are the present issues that concern you?”, and “what are your expectations of therapy?”. Then after that I would assess Gary’s and Brook’s relationship by asking them questions such as, “what problems that you have identified are concerning or time consuming at the moment?” and “what situations or experiences enact this miscommunication?” After assisting their issues, I would assign homework that would allow them to use critical thinking and problem
I also chose the article “Passionate Marriage” By David Schnarch. Because of the couple’s disconnection, they each took the other’s criticism so personally. They blamed one another for their lack of intimacy, when, in fact, both were at fault. They each lacked the knowledge of their partner’s true self and the maturity to be open to the other’s needs and wants. Once they began to work with the therapist, they were able to discover their true selves and understand their behaviors towards one another. You were correct in saying that once they were able to build on their emotional connections with one another, their intimacy was no longer an issue.
Gehart, D. R., & Tuttle, A. R. (2003). Theory-based treatment planning for marriage and family therapists. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
During treatment Cognitive-Behavioral Couple Therapy (CBCT) and Integrative Behavioral Couple Therapy (IBCT) will use feedback sessions to help assess how the couple is doing in a positive way (Gurman, 2008). Both CBCT and IBCT both use conflict and emotional expressions as avenues for couples to express their affection and understanding for one another (Gurman, 2008). Both CBCT and IBCT also have the same value system of creating a general closeness and intimacy between partners (Gurman, 2008). Regardless of the differences, the two therapies have the general
The counselor will ask questions to clarify and summarize the family’s concerns. I will answer any questions and address any concerns raised by the family about the therapy process. I will also assist in laying down parental authority and a sense of impartiality among the children. This will reinstate equilibrium in the family and motivate all members to participate in the therapy.
Therapy focuses on issues and problems that are troubling the client at the present moment and try to help them using brief therapy. Therapists typically ask questions about family role patterns, rules, goals, and stages of development.
, I believe the authors’ were instrumental in providing a clear example of what the family really needed and searched for. The family needed to realize that in order for the family to make a real change they need to utilize a structure that included the entire family. They also needed to know that the therapists were completely serious
Within the case presentation, there was reflection on the different theories that could be applied in her intervention and how to use different elements of each, such as the miracle question to understand what the client wants out of therapy (DeJong & Kim Berg, 2013). It was on account of cumulative knowledge gained during previous coursework pertaining to cognitive behavioral theory (CBT) as well as the in-depth discussion of the narrative approach within the capstone class that had ultimately led to, while short term, some progress within the client’s care during her time of treatment prior to her move. The process of learning about how to engage the client had resulted in the start of a good therapeutic relationship where the client
Cognitive behavioral therapy partner has focused on the detailed analysis of everyday conflicts that can lead to the breakdown of the relationship; it has been raised how problems arise, and how they are maintained. It has identified a feature which is associated with them generally, a predominance of negative interactions on positive. With the obvious aim of achieving an effective intervention, it has raised the ways to overcome them focusing on increasing the exchange of positive behaviors and improving communication and problem solving.
I think that it would be important to build a safe space for the couple to be able to communicate authentically about the issues at hand. To accomplish this, I would try to make a list collaboratively with couple in what safety means for them while in therapy. The list will then become the ground rules for the continuation of the therapy. From there, I would take some time to establish “I” statements as a way to communicate issues from the perspective of the person who is talking about a relational issue. Taking turns while talking would be another ground rule that I would establish as they appear to talk over each other during emotional moments. Talking with respect would be another rule to establish in order to allow the couple to listen to each other.
The session will begin with an intake and assessment where the therapist will gain insight on who the client is and what their situation is through the process of asking questions.
The third explanation is functional, where problems result when people try to protect or control one another covertly (Nichols, 2014, p.93). When Andrew avoids communicating with his wife, he believes he is protecting her by not initiating an argument but Rebecca does not know this and views Andrew as being unresponsive. For Andrew and Rebecca, their treatment plan will be based off the Strategic Family Therapy Model. The goals in this treatment plan will be to interrupt the symptomatic hierarchical structure and covert alliances (Gehart & Tuttle, 2003, p.46). Another goal will be to change the style of interactions between the members in the social unit.
An important question to ask when meeting with a couple for the first time is if the couple had ever been to therapy before? The couple’s response will provide Dr. Heitler with an understanding as to why the couple is seeking therapy as well as provide her with a reason(s) why their previous counseling sessions were unsuccessful.
Cognitive-behavioral family therapy provides many strengths for families. It also helps strengthen the relationship between couples that are married. Therapists treating couples who are married use strategies to improve the foundation of their marriage. In cognitive behavioral family therapy couples are taught to express themselves clearly and are taught new behaviors to improve communication and establish a solid union as partners. They are also taught strategies to solve marital problems and ways to maintain positive control. Toggle appreciable family therapy provides a number of treatment interventions for the family to improve their emotional regulation. An example of an intervention is the downward Arrow which helps families Express their feelings and the emotions behind them it allows them to express their emotions and understand them while projecting in a calm manner not leading to recrimination. Nichols 2014 says the greatest shape of behavior therapy is its insistence on its serving what happens and then measuring change 186. The goal of therapy is to help each family member recognize their distortions in thinking and improve and change their behaviors. A weakness of cognitive behavioral therapy is that the emotional state of a client may not be good even though their behavior changes. Nichols (2014) provides a good example of how a mother reports that her son is performing household chores however she feels as though her son does not really want to do the
The first long-term goal is to improve communication skills among each family member. The interventions created to achieve this goal includes: 1) Rosalyn and Carl will complete weekly worksheets and homework assignments provided by their family therapist, 2) Each family member will learn and practice using I-statements to decreasing blaming behavior and increase self awareness, and 3) Each family member will write a letter to address one another and identify how their feelings in regards to the problems identified in therapy along with their ideas of how they can be a part of the solution to decrease the anxiety in the family.
Also with regards to therapy for the counselor, it might be beneficial for a colleague to sit in on some sessions with the therapist to make sure their issues aren’t affecting their counseling. It can never hurt to get feedback and other perspectives, especially if the therapist is struggling with personal or professional issues.