preview

Comparing Teen Vogue Ads

Decent Essays

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “Every day, 3,800 youth younger than 18 years smoke their first cigarette.” Although smoking may appeal to many as a favorite pastime, it leaves drastic effects on a person’s health and everyday life. The Real Cost, a company who demonstrates the catastrophic effects of smoking, expresses this point in two of its advertisements. The Teen Vogue advertisement from 2015 features a female in her teen years displaying the short-term effects of smoking; however, the Seventeen ad from 2017 reveals the long-term effects. While both advertisements warn consumers of the dangers of smoking, the Teen Vogue ad relies on the emotional appeal of fear, whereas the Seventeen ad uses clever text and …show more content…

Although similar, each ad has a different method in how they express those emotions. Teen Vogue’s tone can be seen as slightly humorous, yet still frightening and sad. The audience views this as jocular due to the female’s confident smile, even though her putrescent teeth are clearly visible. The audience considers this as an ignorant issue that she could easily fix, yet she still continues to intensify it. Teen Vogue also uses logos, the appeal of reason, in its propaganda. Teen Vogue executes this by using the statement, “Cigarettes can cause your teeth to yellow and can lead to serious gum disease. What are cigarettes costing you?” This is undoubtedly offering logical information to try and persuade the audience to refrain from smoking. The closing rhetorical question leaves an opportunity for the audience to reflect on what was said and allows them to contemplate their own attitude towards smoking. Contrary to Teen Vogue, Seventeen’s tone is more serious and threatening. The atmosphere surrounding the advertisement is very dark and ominous which creates the impression of misery. The ad itself has very little color, which further intensifies this emotion. Similar to the other advertisement, Seventeen uses the appeal to reason in its text about nicotine “reprogramming” your brain. Although this is an exaggeration, it is based on the fact that nicotine alters the brain’s chemical makeup. Ultimately, this statement gives readers additional insight into the outcomes of

Get Access