preview

Competitive Strategies Of Toyota

Good Essays

Nowadays, due to globalization, local markets have strongly expanded and became part of global markets, which lead to a strong increase in competition between organizations. They now do not only have to compete with other local organizations, but with organizations globally. This makes it necessary for organizations to keep up with the increasing speed of innovation. In order to deal with the increasing global competition, one must distinguish him by taking the importance of diversification seriously and be aware of the importance of creating a strong identity. The famous British psychologist Edward de Bono once said:
“As competition intensifies, the need for creative thinking increases. It is no longer enough to do the same thing better… no …show more content…

Toyota’s strength is creating the best cars at lowest cost and developing new concepts and products within shortest timeframe. To accomplish this, they use a quite unorthodox manufacturing system. The management of Toyota is convinced that success is not only achieved by striving to optimal efficiency. It seriously invests in their employees in order to ameliorate their capabilities and therefore as a final result improve the strength and capabilities of the entire company. Ideas are shared horizontally as well as vertically and management constantly stimulates the process. The company sees the employees as the essential key assets of their …show more content…

Here, strong hierarchy is being used. The main difference between those two examples is the source of creativity. Whereas Toyota stimulates creativity through the whole company and on every hierarchical level, at the Ford model all the ideas are coming from top management or could even come from one person. So the role employees play in the organisation is contrasting. Henry Ford utilized them as manufacturers, physically performing their assigned tasks. They were not included in the process of innovation whatsoever. As Henry Ford has shown, this can be a very effective structure and use of power as well. However, a relevant threat could be the continuation of an organisation. When fully dependent on one person, the future of the company could be in danger and this could be very threatening for innovation processes. However, it is not possible to fully compare these two examples with one another. Although they do have the same production process, both companies operated in different times. Henry Ford’s company operated at the very start commercial organizations, whereas Toyota is operating in more advanced time. In my opinion, it cannot be said what the best way of using power is to stimulate the process of innovation. The right equity must be found. Using too much power could demote creativity and therefore potentially could slowdown innovation. On the other hand, there must be

Get Access