Some people believe that exams are an inappropriate way of measuring students’ performance and should be replaced by continuous assessment. Do you agree or disagree?
In Korea, it was commonly believed that the College Scholastic Ability Test would determine which university the student would enter. Some students even committed suicide because of their low score. The government chose to perform continuous assessment partially because it is efficient to evaluate students’ lives more thoroughly. The side effects of the CSAT including mental and physical problems of students have reduced slowly. Continuous assessment is more appropriate to test student’s school life than one big exam for students’ happy lives.
Taking continuous assessment, teachers can test students’ every aspect from attitude to academic achievement. Continuous assessment includes grades about all parts of school life such as behavior at class, diligence and academic test. However, a big exam only tests academic knowledge. At an exam only system, it can be
…show more content…
At continuous assessment system, to enter their dream university, students have to get high score including behavior grades in the classroom. Because whoever disturbs classmates during the class gets lower score at behavior part than the others, students are usually careful at the class. If one boy made noise during the class and bullied the others, teachers will warn him and said to him that he will get the lowest score. Most students do not want to get low scores and follow their teachers’ order without complain. Without benefit for teachers, this scoring method also gets a good press because students can get grades in accordance with their study attitude not just a big exam. Continuous assessment is the advantageous way of grading because it makes teachers easy to handle the troublemakers who are so noisy that the others are affected and involves in
There is so much to consider when talking about assessments. There are all kinds of different types of assessments. There are assessments that happen on a daily basis in the classroom and then there are the tests that everyone knows about; the state mandated assessments, map test, and some know about DIBLES tests. These are the types of tests that parents, teachers, and administrators debate about. The debate is whether or not these test are doing students any good or harming them. It is good to have data on student and school’s progress, it keeps everyone accountable however, some believe that schools are testing too much. That all this time focused on testing is actually taking away from learning time. Each type of assessment has it’s own set of challenges.
The teacher will continuously carry out assessments and reviews taking into consideration the surroundings, the schedule, themselves and their learners in order that aims and objectives are met and
Students dread the time of the year when they stop with their course material and begin to prepare for test. Everyone is in agreement that some type of revolution is needed when it comes to education; eliminating standardized test will aid the reform. The need for standardized testing has proven to be ineffective and outdated; some leading educationalist also believe this because the tests do not measure a student’s true potential. This will save money, stop labeling, and alleviate stress in students and teachers.
Assessment is a valuable tool to measure students learning and achievement. It is an essential element for teacher to reflect on what and how they teach. To assess students is to collect evidence of their learning. Teachers use the information to modify their lesson plans and adjust their instructional methods; students need feedback on their performance to concentrate on their vulnerable areas. Assessment is necessary for parents to reinforce their children strength and assist them where extra attention is required. The data collected will inform school
As a tutor I will carry out various methods of assessment to maintain continuous improvement; I also involve my learners in the process.
My personal philosophy of assessment consists of several components. The first component is that both formative and summative assessment belong in the classroom. The second component is that, although teachers should teach what is on the STAAR tests, they should try to avoid just “teaching to the test” the entire year. I also believe that different forms of assessments should be used throughout the year. Finally, I believe that assessments should always be structured in a way that is fair to the students, and addresses all learning styles. Overall, tests belong in the classroom, but should not be the focus of instruction and should be fair for all students.
As the awarding body will require the teacher to assess the student’s level of learning, the teacher will still need to decide what methods of assessment are required. This may be observation during any session, and completing assignments. It is important when any assessment has been made the teacher must give the student feedback. Finally the teacher needs to review any assessment and make any changes where necessary. It is important that the teacher maintains a record of student progress as this may be a requirement of the organisation.
This is why assessments should be an ongoing process throughout the learning experience. Assessments are not only there to assess a learner to sit an exam to test a learner’s knowledge of the subject matter but to:
Yes, tests are an important method to evaluate a student’s performance. In fact, tests demonstrate a student’s progress in the class, demonstrating what the student knows or does not know. It is the result or the outcome that needs modifications. After a paper or test or project is submitted to the instructor for assessment, that paper or test is given a value or a number based on the quality of the work, and this is the problem. This creates the illusion of learning because the end goal circulates in obtaining a high grade, not learning. In Pippin’s article concerning grades (352), she asserts, “students may be working hard for a hard grade and not for deeper learning. The interest is in the reward of the grade, not the
The grading system is failed cause student focus on score and being on top of the class. In school, children may learn basic academic skills. Also, they may discover social knowledge by attending at the school, which the educational system base for testing and grading; therefore, they will evaluate with marks and understand of teacher’s technique “This stage lasts twelve years, a period during which the child learns that success comes from telling testers what that want to hear”(Baker 72). In fact this structure helps student to prepare for
Ch. 2 – Who are the various users of assessment and its results? What specific instructional decisions can be made based on assessment results? Why must we build balanced assessment systems to support the instructional programs we offer students? This chapter nails down the purpose of assessing, which is gathering information to inform teachers of students of their instruction and learning, respectively. In this way, assessment is individualized to each student and classroom, and because all students/classes are different, it should inform the teachers of what is working or not working in the classroom, which should then influence some sort of change to instruction. This chapter also talks about the different levels of assessment – from the individuals
The assessment method must take into account the characteristic of the learner and needs to be consistent and relevant to what is being assessed. The assessment will not only focus on improving the learning, it will measure their achievements and also remind the learner of how they are progressing.
According to Turgut, educational tests have improved in its validity and reliability since the initial introduction of standardized tests (65). Parents and educators who have experienced tests and quizzes every class time believe that if given more exams, students would have to
Assessments are integral parts of instruction, they determine whether classroom goals have been achieved, and help teachers know what areas they should focus on and maybe reteach. They are great tools for developing lesson plans and answer questions such as; “do my students possess full understanding of the material?” There are many ways of assessing students’ learning, one of which I have personal experience with are on-the-spot assessments.