Controversial Absentia Case Study

Gina Blair represented a competitive-cooperative negotiation strategy which represented a middle ground, both combined in a style which was open minded but assertive. Gina had scheduled the telephone meeting between herself and Daniel Trent; therefore she had more knowledge about what was going to be discussed. As she had initiated the negotiation she had prepared well for the issues concerning her clients. She presented her negotiation in a logical structure, showing that she had prepared all the areas of concern which she intended to address. Her preparation allowed her to identify and prioritise her client’s concerns. She avoided small talk and was very direct, her approach was assertive and she projected confidence. She had a clear understanding of the issues which were of concern to her clients and had proposed

Negotiations are a part of daily life whether we are aware of them occurring or not. In everything that we do there are preferred end results and the end results are likely to affect more than one person. The goal in this however, is to ensure that all parties are equally benefited from the actions and reactions that occur to create that end result. While some dealings are done in a more subtle manner without a great deal of negotiation per say there are other situations that would warrant more vocalized mutually acceptable compromises. The purpose of this paper will be to effectively explain a situation of which required negotiation on the part of both parties that almost all of us have endured and that would be the process of buying a

Luke is an employee of ABC Company. He has been assigned to a construction of an adult entertainment retail store within a neighborhood his brother, Owen, lives in. The development of the retail store has not been made public yet and will be announced one month from today. This announcement will decrease the property values of the surrounding areas significantly. Owen is trying to sell his house. He told Luke that he recently received an ‘okay’ offer. However, in hopes that a better offer might be present itself in a few years after the real estate market improve, he has not taken the offer yet. Luke is very close to his brother, which makes him concerned about his confidentiality obligation to ABC Company.

1. How did you plan for the negotiation? Explain how you decided on a strategy?

However, Candace was very skilled and duplicitous during the negotiation. While at no point did Candace lie to me. She did make the full entirety of Absentia’s plans for the property. It was later revealed to me, after the formal negotiation, that Absentia planned to develop a high-rise hotel directly behind the Bullard House. This is completely unacceptable to my constituents, however, the deal was already agreed upon by the time I was informed. Candace used the questionable negotiation strategy of deception to ensure she received a favorable deal. She knowingly withheld information that would have impact the terms of our deal. For her, the deal was a success. However, I am left feeling mislead. When I would question her about the types of commercial development that her constitutes sought to pursue, she would make vague references to tasteful additions within the property. The lack of effective question is a failure of mine. I should have begun to ask probing questions, as Lewicki suggests, when I realized that she was not fully disclosing information. Instead I allowed the ambiguous answers to be the basis of my decision

In our recent negotiation, my partner Dave and I assumed the roles of Alan Hacker, a computer software developer, and Alan Hacker’s lawyer. Being the lawyer in the negotiation my objective was to avoid litigation with my client’s partner Stanley Star and to aid in the continuation of my client’s co-owned company HackerStar. In addition, I would assist Hacker in coming to an agreement that would be satisfying for him both personally and financially. I felt that Dave and I presented a reasonable argument on Hacker’s behalf and, since I was able to apply some of our class readings during the process, I was overall pleased with the outcome.

People- Pat Olafson is a local investor and real estate developer. In comparison to Sandy, Pat has been very financially successful. Their relationship seems to be multi-layered. Pat plays the role of bank, landlord, and client to Sandy and WoodCrafters. While not illegal, or even immoral, allowing one person, or entity, to have so much control over your business life isn’t the wisest decision. In addition, the combination of Pat’s success and Sandy’s hardships seems to have caused Sandy to be jealous of Pat’s success. It would be in Sandy’s best interest to recognize that his perception of Pat bears no significance on this negotiation. Sandy would be best served by leaving his perceptions behind and keeping his emotions in check.

Pilgrim Assurance is a case that involves a sealed bid auction. Therefore, the auctioneers will need to sell the building to the highest bidder involved at a minimum bid of $15 million. David Bailey is given the decision to decide on how much to bid for an office building. Furthermore, he needs to make the decision whether to lease it as office space or to convert this office space into condominiums. In this case, I will analyze the goals and objectives of Bailey as well as the other participants. The sealed bid auction indicates that they are willing to take a chance on the market and try to receive high bids. There is no problem with the government participant besides using permits to do renovations. There is

Luke has been asked to work on a project that involves developing land recently bought by ABC to build an adult entertainment retail store. According to the plan, Luke’s brother, Owen, whom he is very close to, lives in the neighborhood that the adult entertainment retail store plan will be built. Luke knows that as soon as the plans for the store become public, the property value of the homes in Owen’s neighborhood are expected to decrease significantly. Luke is concerned about his confidentiality obligations to the company. Owen has openly expressed to Luke that he has thought about putting his home on the market for sale; this is concerning for Luke. He knows that Owen has received and acceptable offer for his home already, but wonders if the market for real estate in the area will increase in the next few years.

Negotiation is the process of making amicable decisions between individuals or groups.  In this assignment, I will discuss a negotiation that did not result in the best possible solution for all parties. This negotiation was related to my work experience where I was a realtor who was representing a buyer in negotiation of the property’s price, mortgage loan rate and terms. I am a real estate licensee and also a member of National Association of Realtors. I have been practicing my license for seven years now. Seven years of experiences in real estate industry

Both our approaches were directed towards addressing the issues with a collaborative spirit for the greatest benefit to both sides. We agreed that both sides wanted to establish a long term a relationship with each other and were willing to give genuine consideration to each other’s particular needs and interests. This experience has enabled me to reflect on my personal approach towards negotiation, as well as analyze my strengths and potential areas for improvement as a negotiator.

In the "Cascade Manor" negotiation, I played the role of co-chief city planner. I was part of a team, partnered with the other co-chief city planner and the city's financial director. It was our task to negotiate a deal with a development corporation who wanted to build a residential housing community to revitalize the historic district of our city. We devised a strategy on how we would open and negotiate on the issues. Using this strategy we were able to agree to a deal with the developers, and walk away with a sizeable amount of the "pie". This paper will look at how offering multiple package deals help the negotiator claim resources, and suggests ideas on how to develop an effective multiple offer strategy.

The value of being prepared cannot be overstated when it comes to negotiations. Failure to understand one 's best alternative to a negotiated agreement (BATNA) options is one example of poor planning that can leave a party at the mercy of another. Such is the case of the Pacific Oil Company (POC) case study where POC and Reliant Corporation worked together to negotiate a business contract for the supply and purchase of a vinyl chloride monomer (VCM) product. The negotiation process did not go as planned, and the following will explain the case overview, provide insight to the various negotiation styles and tactics utilized in the negotiation process, and explore the anticipated outcome of the contract negotiations.

When the Statute of the STL was drafted, care was taken in order to ensure safeguards for the accused person’s rights when holding trials in absentia: Article 22.2 states that when a hearing is to be held without the accused present, the tribunal must ensure that the accused is notified or is served with the indictment, or is otherwise notified through publications made through the media. It is essential and required by law before holding a trial in absentia to ensure that the accused is aware of the decision of initiating a trial against them. Such a provision can be found under Lebanese law, in article 283 of the Lebanese Code of Criminal Procedure, which requires for a formal summons to be issued, which at the same time is a way of trying to get the accused to surrender himself. Furthermore, under the same code, “all available means to bring the summons to the attention of the accused” must be used. The accused also has the right to be represented in court by a defense counsel “with a view to ensuring full representation of the interests and rights of the accused.” Furthermore, Mr. Francois Roux, head of the STL’s Defense Office, has stated that the lawyers appointed “will not exactly be the accused person’s lawyer, but rather the advocate for the rights of the accused.”

In today’s competitive scenario, achieving successful results through negotiations has become more important. But often negotiations face either complete failures or achieve far less than its actual potential. Also, such unsuccessful negotiations may perennially damage the reputation and relationships amongst the counterparties involved.