Difference Between Teaching And Teaching Styles

Some teachers have up to 30 plus students per class and up to 6 or more classes each day. This can pose a challenge with the teachers on how effectively they can work with students on a one-on-one level. Unfortunately, a situation can also arise in which the teacher does not necessarily bother with teaching students and are not bothered if they begin to fall behind.

For years, there have been many theorists who have shared their views on how individuals learn. Such research has determined that individuals have different learning styles. It is important for teacher to understand the learning styles of both themselves and their students because it helps them to relay the subject knowledge to the students. The teacher is in a position where they must be able to assess the learning styles of their students. This means that the students and teachers are both in a process of learning.

It is common for individuals to think that every teacher is taught how different students are and how to adapt their lesson plans

Being aware of learning style is beneficial for individuals in both teaching and learning roles. By knowing personal strengths and preferences, the learner is able to devise ways to augment and tailor the way in which information is received and processed regardless of the way it is presented. With that being said, those that are in teaching positions must make the realization that not everyone learns in the same manner. Being aware of this will lead the teacher to discover new ways to present information in a way that will address the needs of all members of the class. If all parties involved are knowledgeable of prominent styles within a group; the teaching learning environment can be much more effective.

Not every teacher teaching the same subject is going to emphasize the same area of that subject because each teacher has a different

Research shows that attributes of the classroom teacher significantly affect how well students learn. Recently it has become clear that the

I believe that even though students have the same opportunities and environment in the same exact classroom, they are all still not receiving the same education. This all depends on their mental capacities, the amount of attention they give, and if they understand the assignments and lectures. Everyone can have different experiences and take in different information even though being in the same

Another problem that inhabits the educational system is teachers who are unprepared to prepare students for the many standardized test that are given. An example would be that the average teacher in Finland must go through a grueling curriculum in order to become teachers (Schneider, and Christison 30-32). This shows that we lack in preparing our teachers to teach. This of course also leads to unpreparedness from students, to low test grades and a loss of interest. Teachers should become more flexible in the way they teach, allowing creativity and a way for the student to gain feedback from the teacher to want to learn more of the subject (Slon 47-49).

The nurse educators are faced with the challenge of adapting their teaching styles to accommodate a new generation of learners. An effective teacher should take into account the intellectual, social, and cultural characteristics of each student, whereas the students should identify that each teacher has a unique style of teaching. As part of the classroom-online teaching practicum course, I was privileged to shadow an instructor at the University of South Florida. The instructor was giving lectures on both Mondays and Wednesdays for semester 1 students and had fundamentals of nursing lab sessions on both Tuesdays and Thursdays. The teaching styles that I attended in the classroom set up were plain lectures, group discussion with flipped classroom (different instructor) whereas the teaching in the fundamentals lab were done with demonstrations on the manikins (observed various instructors demonstrating various skills).

Students are often told that the path to success tends to be a lonely one because only they can get themselves there. For the most part that is true, they must be self-motivated and passionate about their future, but along the way they get to meet special people that want to see them to accomplish their goals. From an early age the relationship built between students and teachers has molded and impacted the student’s life. The relationship they have with a teacher can define the attitude that student has with the subject being taught. A lot of emphasis is put on students when they fail a course and they question their effort. Although, the root of the problem is not always the student, but the method the instructor is using to teach the student.

When entering fall semester at Ramapo College, I realized that each professor had their own style when teaching. I had to adjust to each professors teaching technique. Obviously, adjusting was a very hard mechanism to adopt too. I did not have a studying technique as well, which made it harder on me. So,

Teachers recognize that student success is to a great degree dependent on teacher success. No teacher sets out to fail. For the sake

Many times teachers are given a broad spectrum of classes that are somehow associated with the subject in which they are qualified to teach in. This means that Calculus teachers can also have Algebra 1, Geometry or Pre-Calculus classes all in one semester. This is usually done in order to reduce the amount of teachers needed in each school and it can work. The problem is that even though one might be great at teaching Calculus, it doesn’t mean that they are also great at teaching those other subjects. To effectively teach a subject one must not only completely understand the material, but it should also be something that you can explain to your students in a way that helps them learn it. So even though the school has a “qualified teacher” in those classes, their students struggle to learn the material more than they would with a teacher that is more qualified in that specific subject. One issue that surfaces when changing this is that classes become larger since less teachers would teach each subject. However, the quality of the teaching, arguably the most important aspect, will improve greatly. This will in turn lead to students understanding the material easier and more effectively (Gilpin, 1423). Once a school gets that done to the best of their ability, they need to look at the way the courses are set up. Many high school classes, even advanced ones, do not properly

No teachers are similar as well as no students learn in the same way. Every teacher has their own unique teaching style which is based on their educational philosophy, their classroom’s demographic, what subject area they teach, and the school’s mission statement. Up until now, teachers are looking for a system that will engage students in the educational process and will develop the students’ critical thinking skills. Moreover, teachers want the classroom to be in order and in control, but they also want their students to appreciate the learning procedure. These teaching styles can be divided into two approaches – the teacher-centered and learner-centered.

In fact, I realized, as I continued to read, my teachers did a lot of modeling and demonstrations on completing a task. In addition, they had the ability to adjust learning to their students learning need and style, even though learning styles were not part of the system yet (Hamond et al., n.d.). Therefore, much of my teaching mimics how I learned from those teachers. I believe in guiding my students toward discovery on their own; therefore, my lessons were thought out, so they encompassed each student’s learning style. I taught 6th-grade social studies, not an exhilarating course to garner excitement.