The difference and similarity that were found between a negative muon and electron was that:
Difference
The electron was found to have less mass (or rest energy) then the negative muon.
Similarities
They are both found to be fundamental particles, meaning that they are either a lepton or they are both negative.
Yet to be scanned. The Early Universe and the Standard Model (**)
The Early Universe
Throughout the very first moments to have existed in the universe, was the big bang. Before this the universe was extremely hot and dense. As the universe began to cool, circumstances changed just as the building blocks of matter being the quarks and electrons of which we are all made, began to arise. Within a few millionths of a second later,
…show more content…
Some of the fundamental singularities that are not clarified are gravity, dark matter and dark energy, neutrino masses, and matter anti-matter symmetry. Throughout the standard model, it refers to the ideas of hypothetical applications that are required to explain the insufficiencies of the standard model. This includes the nature of dark matter and dark energy, and also the origins of mass. Another error that may lie within the standard model is the inconsistencies and mathematics that lie within the model itself. The standard model is majorly inconsistent just like the theory of general relativity, they both interrupted by the conditions of other aspects revolving around these ideas, such as the Big Bang and black hole horizons. Despite the standard model being one of the most successful and practical theories of particle physics, it is however not perfect.
The string theory is a hypothetical application, which is used around particle physics and is replaced by a one dimensional object being the ‘string’. Throughout the meanings of this theory explains how the ‘strings’ transmits through the space, and interacts with each other. Throughout certain distances, the scales can appear to be much larger than the string scale. The appearance of the particle is just that its looks like a standard particle. The string theory is proven to be a theory of quantum
I noticed a few differences between the two theorists. The first difference I noted was their views on the
This scientific advancement is the result of Fermilab’s ongoing NOvA experiment, which hopes to uncover the secrets of those elusive particles called neutrinos. The study released its final results earlier this week. The experiment’s gigantic particle detector is capable of detecting neutrinos fired from an impressive 500 miles’ distance, but the scientists are having a hard time forming significant conclusions from this recent success. It’s incumbent for these quantum physicists to progress their theories because to understand which neutrinos are heavier or lighter will help us construct theories about how these particles accumulate mass.
A series of Cathode Ray experiments were held to study the effects of both magnetic and electric fields. These experiments determined the ratio of its charge to its mass. He concluded that they weren’t rays but that they were very light, very small negatively charged particles aka corpulse or more commonly known as electrons (Crash Course Video). Thomson also concluded that the mass of the charged particle was less than the mass of a Hydrogen atom. This proved that there was a particle smaller than an atom. Thomson tried to answer questions about the nature of atoms using a model, this model was called the Plum Pudding Model (Atomic Structure Prazi). This model depicted the atom as a spherical shape composed of uniformly distributed positively charged electrons
He developed the plum pudding model that showed negatively charged electrons scattered throughout a positively charged sphere.
"In the course of the past few decades, the Standard Model has passed critical tests derived from experiment, but it does not address some profound questions about the nature of the Universe," (AFP, 2015)
Therefor I can say that they are very similar to each other and it is hard two say which one is
Many people have heard of dark matter, however most will admit that they do not have a clear understanding of its existence. To most, dark matter remains a mystery or just a science fiction term. Dark matter is a matter—simply meaning that it has mass. Many people find it hard to comprehend the term dark matter because it cannot be seen. It is not visible because it does not interact with light (meaning it does not give off light or absorb light). Therefore, if we cannot see it, how can we believe that it exist. Experiments and observations have been conducted to build evidence that dark matter exists. The information and explanations gathered present convincing evidence for dark matter. This evidence is found within the speed of galaxy
Astronomers have figured out that dark matter is present due to the unusual bending of light in places where nothing but empty space exists as well as the unusual movement of stars and galaxies that can not be accounted for. The dark matter problem arose because of a difference in the masses of galaxies and larger cosmic structures. The components of these systems-stars and gas is in the description of galaxies. Gas and galaxies in the case of galaxy clusters move about but do not escape. They are restricted because they are watched over carefully by the gravitational pull from the rest of the system. The laws of physics tell us how much mass has to be nearby to counterbalance the motions. This will result by preventing the dispersal of the system. Doubtfully, the tally of mass that astronomers actually observe falls relatively short compared to further away. Dark matter is the only explanation that scientists can come up with for the difference between these totals.
In conclusion, Dark matter and dark energy cannot be observed but affect our universe in strange ways, and even though we know there effects are still quite a mystery scientists
Astronomers are still in the hunt of the Dark energy and dark matter but they haven’t found none. They are undetectable which makes it
The two of them were both used as polar opposites, led of the same start. They are born from different
“Dark matter is a hypothesized form of matter particle that does not reflect or emit electromagnetic radiation. The existence of dark matter is inferred from gravitational effects on visible matter, such as stars and galaxies”(Andrew Zimmerman Jones). Dark matter is crucial to the study of the universe and the existence of the human race. Since either dark matter or dark energy have neither been actually observed and all theories, we will be evaluating them from scientific standpoint. Since most of the light in the universe is not seen or can be seen because of the existence of dark matter, no one can really tell what exactly it is. This is why “dark matter” is the generic term used to describe the part of the universe in which light is neither absorbed nor reflected. Through the evaluated articles, we can deduce that the theory was first proposed by Astronomer Jon Oort in 1932 and further examined in 1933 by Fritz Zwicky. While studying, he made note of a large portion of “missing mass” within the galaxy. Jan Oort was studying the matter in the galaxy and noticed that there has to be more mass then that could be seen but figured that he made an error. Astrophysicist Fritz Zwicky made a similar observation when using mathematical equations to calculate the mass of the universe and noticed that there was evidence of invisible matter. Both men basically theorized that there is something in the universe thats invisible and abundant that provided enough gravity to hold
An explosion of incomprehensible speed was the beginning of our known Universe and existence. At that time matter as small as the head of a pin inflated to become larger than the visible Universe of today in less than one millisecond. The newly born Universe cooled very quickly and continued to grow. Still, the heat was too great for normal elementary particles like protons and neutrons to
The other explanation was an invisible form of matter, which is where we were able to conclude that dark matter was at work. (How Dark Matter Works)
The multiverse is considered a mystery because it is near impossible to prove. The theory deals with topics such as, quantum physics, quantum mechanics and philosophy, which can take decades to learn. The experiments have been accumulating for more than a century now and the precision achieved are simply breathtaking. Even if we could prove that there were in fact, multiple universes out there, we would have a less than zero chance that we could ever explore one. It is physical impossible to travel fast enough to the end of our universe and to the beginning of