In May 2017, as attendees of a pop concert were exiting the venue in Manchester, a bomb went off, killing over twenty people, and injuring many more. In addition to the horror and fear caused by this atrocity, there was complete disbelief throughout the world, as nobody imagined something this horrific would happen. Despite the tremendous shock of the situation, people flocked to respond passionately to what happened. For many, the focus was on the victims of the event and making sure they were cared for as best as possible. But, for some others, the focus instead was on hating the man who detonated the bomb, and his accomplices. While it's important to bring people to justice for their crimes, and to discourage any future events like this …show more content…
Even those who live on the complete opposite side of England were heavily impacted by this act of terror; many people lost their loved ones, or simply were forced to deal with the fact that their country is one in which things like this can happen. Perhaps it's our over reliance on authorities and other "protectors" to keep us safe that explains why events like this catch us so wholly off guard. On the other hand, it may just be that people don't want to imagine horrors like this being a reality. In almost every movie and TV show nowadays, acts of hate, usually resulting in fatalities, are a regular presence. Consequently, seeing something so often on screen causes a person to associate it with theatrics; making events like this seem like the kind of thing you'd see on screen sure, but never in real life. As a result, on top of all of the pain, and fear, caused by events like these, there's an added layer of surrealism.
While people were completely unsure of what to think about a tragedy like this, it did not stop them responding. Upon learning of this horrific act, people responded in two very different ways. Some responded in love, opening their homes and hearts to the victims of the event and even taxi drivers and local hotels offered their assistance through free transportation and
1.) Asa Don Brown, the author of “Desensitization of Terrorism,” focuses on how the influence of the media and social media have desensitized us when it comes to terrorist attacks. Brown directs the article toward an audience who questions why they are no longer as surprised by terrorist attacks when they occur as they used to be. This seems like an extremely odd feeling to have when several people are killed and hundreds are hurt, however, it is the strange reality these days. Terrorist attacks have been happening for years and years now and while we would love to just stop them from occurring, this is blatantly impossible to achieve. He emphasizes in the article, the idea that when terrorist attacks and the terrorists themselves are
I learned quite a bit about the psychological impact of the Boston Marathon Bombing. After researching the effects, I realized how much trauma these innocent people went through during a moment that was supposed to be joyous. People that were healthy and filled with life were either severely injured or had there life taken away by a senseless act. Some of the injured victims will never be able to walk again, others, never able to see their loved ones again. Martin Richard, an 8-year old boy whose life was taken during the attack, will never get to see his family one more time. The amount of grief the Tsarnev brothers caused can never be taken back and it has left a psychological effect on the viewers and the victims – runners, adults and children.
By understanding the steps to prepare for countering and responding to a terrorist, the well-being of US national security interests can be promoted and the exposure to risk and susceptibility to experiencing harm can be efficiently managed for communities, families and individuals in the event of a terrorist incident. The welfare of US national security, citizens and property can be effectively safeguarded through the understanding of protection strategies administered collectively by local communities, families and individuals. Local emergency operations planning, family disaster planning, as well as self-protection planning each represent important protective measures, which serve to educate the nation and its citizens how to
Terrorist attacks are a consistent global occurrence.The 2005 London underground bombings was an attack which caused largest mass fatality occurrence in the UK since World War 2. As a result the comfort and use of public transport in the UK was greatly impacted. Research into the fatalities and physical repercussions of tragedies are amplified globally. For instance it is considered factual that the
Butko (2006; Freedman, 2005) slightly reflects on Symeonidou-Kastanidou’s (2004) definition in less mechanical way by adding to it that there should be certain psychological effect on innocent victims. In case of the Gunpowder Plot, if the Plot would have failed to achieve its intended purpose, plotters expected at least to evoke condemnation of the society towards the King. The most definitive feature of terrorism in Butko’s (2006) opinion is the threat of violence or use of violence towards ‘innocent’ people, if all of the barrels with the gunpowder would have been ignited the casualties would have been enormous and it is not that hard to imagine, in light of the September 11, the state of horror it would have inflicted upon the London and the whole
The United States will not soon forget the rampage at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut that occurred just two weeks before Christmas in 2012. This tragic results in the death of twenty students and eight adults. These public acts are bloodcurdling. They create an invisible fear to society. Mass shootings are usually very frightening and receive nation attention because they are often unpredictable. Although the massacre shocked the nation, they are nothing new. In the United States, mass shootings do not happen quite often. Nevertheless, the media coverage often overstates the incident through various methods to hype the scare. When a shooting occurs, the media would not only report the bloody details, attach horrible pictures,
Background/Cause: The September 11 attacks were largely caused by Osama bin Laden, the leader of al-Qaeda. He held beliefs about the United States leading up to the attacks saying that America was weak. According to his comrade, Abu Walid al-Masri, bin Laden believed that the United States was much weaker than some of the people he was associated with. Bin Laden believed that the United States was a “paper tiger,” a belief not only held because of America’s departure from Lebanon, but also by the withdrawal of American forces from Somalia in 1993 and from Vietnam in the 1970s (Bergen).
National terrorism has been the focus of attention since September 11. But now domestic terrorism is becoming increasingly common among hate groups across the nation. Domestic terrorism can be defined as visible crime, or “street crime.” These acts would consist of violent crimes, (acts against people in which injury or death results) property crimes (acts that threaten property held by individuals or the state) and public order crimes. (acts that threaten the general well-being of society and challenger accepted moral principles) It can also however be described as political crime, (criminal acts by or against the government for ideological purposes) which would include the 9/11 and the Oklahoma City bombing.
My primary source for the Analytical Research Paper is a tweet that I came upon on August seventeenth, the day of the appalling, yet not so surprising terrorist attack in Barcelona. I never imagined that I would find myself saying terrorist attacks no longer surprise me. However, they have become increasingly common in the past few years and I believe that no matter the amount of devastation they cause us, society as a whole is somewhat used to it. The tweet contains a video that was taken immediately following the tragedy that occurred nearby. A van was
It was the summer going into 9th grade, I was sitting on my couch scrolling through twitter. I kept seeing people post “Pray for Manchester” I was confused, so I decided to do some research on it. As I typed “ Manchester” on google, I saw that CNN had posted “ Manchester bombing,” and I was even more confused. When I clicked on the website and read that at the end of a Ariana Grande concert, suicide bomber Salman Abedi had taken his life as well as many others. I said to my mom,” How could someone do this to innocent people,” she responded with,” I don’t know but this should never happen.” As I scrolled through twitter and I saw pictures and videos and I was in shock.
Actual people are losing family members. We hear the media report about the bombing one day but the next day something new happens and the prior day’s bombing is forgotten, but it is not forgotten to those who lost a loved one in the tragic bombing.
In all honesty, I had never read into this subset of terrorism in any great detail. However a glaring statement in some of our weekly reading caught my eye. "(A)groterrorism has remained a secondary consideration, and no documented attacks in the homeland have occurred since 9/11." (Olsen 2012). Perhaps the author sees things differently than I, but the Earth Liberation Front (ELF) has staged attacks since 9/11 - that is if one considers arson to be acts of terrorism (History Commons n.d.). Again, one person's terrorist is another person's freedom fighter. In this case, at least the FBI agrees with me that ELF and the similar group Animal Liberation Front (ALF) are domestic terror groups (FBI 2002). Granted, the ALF/ELF attacks that one could identify as agroterrroism is an attack where cattle hauling trucks were burned by ALF, but they have targeted fish farms in the past.
Terrorism and the United States A cloud of anthrax spores looming in the sky of San Diego California
The government can implement many new methods to increase security, or better yet give off the image of better security which is what they have predominantly done, yet ultimately there will always be a way to bypass or come up with a new way to infiltrate that measure. The government so far has done a variety of things ranging from the closing of the Dulles airport (permanently), working with the FAA on new security measures, having pilots carry handguns, and a not so specific, profiling.
The immediacy and the primacy of any truly potent force is the ability to perpetuate itself. Sharp and energetic outbursts have their place, and can be known to have great effect-cataclysmic forces, despite their maximum destructive potential, are temporary in their total effects in relation to some absolute goal. In other words, they are generally limited in scope, and well defined in purpose; there is a tactical objective, which is usually consummated quickly. The more dreaded force creeps along, escalating incrementally, and while it may abide a strategic goal, or even a policy, it is generally open-ended. This sort of ambiguity I am referring to differs from the flexible tactical necessity in that strategic outcomes are very much