preview

Forbidden Fruit Cult Behavior

Good Essays

Satan approached Eve and told her that the only reason God restricted them from eating the "Forbidden Fruit" was because God knew it would make them like God. By implying God had ulterior motives, Satan created an avenue through which he could manipulate Eve. Humans learned a terrible lesson that day, and now, even thousands of years later, that lesson continuously reverberates in our behavior as a whole.
Nowhere is this behavior more reprehensible (and common) than when people use this technique to engage in "church wars".
These are battles that go on behind closed doors. Movements begin. Campaigns decided upon, people wage this warfare for the hearts and minds of whole churches. We've all heard stories and may have survived a few attacks …show more content…

That attempt at control can manifest itself in manipulation through guilt and shame. It can also reveal itself through speaking evil of others.
This is a common practice of cults. Convince adherents that the rest of the world is evil, and you can more easily control what influences them. Control what influences them, and you control them.
But we need not look to cults as the only culprits of this atrocious behavior. Preachers, elders, deacons, church members of any responsibility can engage in this sinful, ungodly behavior.
While there may be many applications of James 4:11-12, this is a common problem in churches.
But what about Paul's statement in 1 Timothy 1:18? He wrote that Timothy should "wage the good warfare." Our mission is to defend truth and win others to the Gospel. The difference here lies in both tactics and purpose. Our purpose must be to win people to the Gospel, not our own agendas and ideas, even if those ideas seem incredibly helpful or valuable to us. Our tactics should always be "speaking the truth in love" (Ephesians 4:15). We must not follow Satan's ways to do the Lord's …show more content…

He who speaks evil of a brother and judges his brother,speaks evil of the law and judges the law. But if you judge the law, you are not a doer of the law, but a judge."
Undoubtedly, this discussion centers upon judging matters of opinion. If someone is in sin, it is not evil to suggest that their activities are sinful. But if someone is doing something that is not sinful, it is evil to suggest that the actions are evil. That makes us judges of the law. If God's word allows an activity through general principles of authority, who are we to suggest that it is sin to do it?
If, for example, I decide that I will fly to Russia in order to spread the Gospel, and someone decides that I am in sin because he does not like Russia, it is evil to say that I am sinning. Not only is it evil, it betrays envy or selfish ambition. And if that person then goes and talks to others about my "sin", he is guilty of even greater sin and is attempting to cause division. Who gives him the right to say I am in sin for doing what God allows me to do? He is, in that case, judging the Word of God itself as evil for allowing the behavior in the first

Get Access