Yes peaceful resistance to laws positively impact society because then society knows that there wants to be change and society would then join in as well and follow the leaders to actually be able to get the chance that they want to be able to actually make a change in the law because if they do it in an awful manner that can create chaos then it wouldn’t really cause any change because then they would be part of another problem taking the attention of the main reason they were protesting for and they really would not accomplish anything because the ones resisting would then be creating a disorder in what they do. In order to get change the people who want change would then would have to first comply to make the process easier and not make it as complicated as possible.
I believe that peaceful resistance to laws is a subject that is not just black and white, but it is a grey subject where in some instances it has a positive impact and in other occasions it has a negative impact. Our country was established because of resistance to laws, it was not peaceful but it did have a positive effect. Also during the Civil War there was a positive impact from a non-peaceful resistance to laws. Some of our law and amendments have been changed because of peaceful resistance but, Peaceful resistance to laws can bring about a lot of commotion. Also, breaking the law, to change the law is not exactly the way to go about it. There measures American citizens can take to change a law or an amendment they believe is unjustifiable.
In my opinion I believe that peaceful resistance is a positive impact on our society. If you look at the many marches we have had in recent years, such as the woman's march held a little over a week again as well as all the recent protests involving this years election, you can see Americans expressing their opinions and beliefs for all to see.
I think peaceful resistance to law positively or negatively impact free Society because it demonstrates that people are in their country to live for every name. Rosa Parks was an amazing example because she knew the long respected it but chose not to follow it when she sat in the front of the bus. Amazing Minds like Marther Luther King jr. Was also an amazing example that you can possibly save the things you want to say and he went to jail but he chose to continue to fight for what he believed in. Civil Disobedience by Henry David Thoreau is an amazing piece of work it shows people that you can respect it but you don't have to follow it in every aspect. In the letter to Birmington Martin Luther King Jr. Demonstrates that he can possibly write
Peaceful resistance to laws are not a threat to a free society; in fact, is is almost encouraged in a way. People who stand up for what they believe in is a staple in this country's history and what has made this great nation what it is. These people are, at the very least, standing up and resisting something that they don't believe in. They aren't the ones that just go with the flow all throughout their lives. It is admirable, even if one personally disagrees with what these people are resisting from. The real problem is when there are people who can't just resist laws in a peaceful way. A perfect example would be exactly what is going on lately with all of the riots since the election and inauguration of Donald Trump is president. People are in the streets and up close to Capitol Hill
Does peaceful resistance to laws positively or negatively impact a free society? People such as Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and Henry David Thoreau make me believe that peaceful resistance does positively impact free society. Also known as civil disobedience, peaceful resistance has been used throughout history To greatly change the world for the better. It has many advantages, but it may also come with some side effects. One of the first cases of civil disobedience is recorded in Henry David Thoreau’s book entitled, “Civil Disobedience”.
Peaceful resistance to laws can negatively impact a free society. Throughout the last election there were a lot of protests that would take place. Some of them were peaceful and others weren't. With each protest they'd end up getting crazy because of the different views people had. It connects to the thesis because any little act of resistance to the law ends up affecting a whole community. There is never such thing as a positive law impact to a free society. Peaceful resistance to laws can negatively impact a free society. Throughout the last election there were a lot of protests that would take place. Some of them were peaceful and others weren't. With each protest they'd end up getting crazy because of the different views people had. It
In the United States of America, multiple groups have risen up and have stood their ground against many forms of oppression. Specifically the Colonists, the Colored, and When the 13 Colonies were being dictated under the rule of King George III; leaders like Thomas Jefferson and Benjamin Franklin rose and looked straight into the devil’s eyes to gain their liberation from their unjustful law oppression in 1776. That event occurred 240 years ago, but like George Santayana said, “Those who do not learn history are doomed to repeat it.” In 1964, the US government ratified or passed the Civil Rights Act that gave all
Peaceful resistance positively impact on a free society because people can be treated the same when resistance is necessary. Some people get treated wrongly and with more force. I think it is wrong for police officers to give more force to people that are a different race.Some laws can be very cruel and usual and people can be charge with stuff they didn't do. But if we have a peaceful resistance this could all be avoided and i don't think people understand that at all everyone that is put in jail will be in there for a reason not because they were arrested for just standing or for something ridiculous. I treat everyone with my up most respect it feels great and I also help homeless and buy them food or a drink . Another thing that doesn't make sense
Peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts free speech in our country. People are allowed to peacefully disobey and accept the consequences. It allows everyone to speak their mind and show how strongly they feel about something. Muhammad Ali disagreed with the war and the draft, so he refused to go and allowed himself to be arrested. While he may have avoided a jail sentence, he still experienced a huge backlash, but stood by his beliefs and didn't let anyone else tell him that he had to blindly follow orders. The government is in place to help us, not to command us. We are not meant to blindly follow their ideas, but to give our input and tell the people in Washington what we want and what type of government commands our respect. Peaceful
Peaceful resistance of laws by itself does not impact a free society at all. In a free society like the United States, it is not the action itself that affects society, but the emotions evoked within society.
Peaceful resistance to laws negatively impacts a free society, because it sets forth restrictions on that society; while at the same time it positively impacts society by keeping the violence out of their protesting. Peaceful residence to laws began before the birth and crucifixion of Jesus Christ, and continues today with Trumps immigration policies.
The idea that peaceful resistance can positively or negatively impact a free society is a topic that requires much thought. Our basic freedoms in this country allow us the right to peacefully protest an injustice that has been done and permitted. One can stage arguments that favor both points of view. The difficulty comes in questioning which laws are debatable and which are not. Do we peacefully resist to laws that protect life or do we resist to laws that seem unpalatable to us personally? I believe we, as Americans, need to be very clear on where to draw the lines. The laws that our nation has adopted are extremely important to the functioning and growth of a proper and stable society.
To ask whether peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society is to miss the purpose of peaceful resistance. If civil disobedience is necessary, it is because the society is not free in some way. Of course, no society is entirely authoritarian or free - real-world societies fall somewhere on a spectrum between the two. But to call a society ‘free’ in which some people are oppressed is to say that this oppression is of secondary importance. This is a dangerous fallacy - when some people in a society are not free, everyone is negatively affected.
Resistance to the government will always have big impacts. Whether that impact is positive or negative is up for debate. But peace resistance will always have a much louder impact. I believe that peaceful resistance is the ultimate key to change. In times of need, civil disobedience is one to rely on to avoid violence. Going with non-violent protest are an easier and less harming to everyone. Civil disobedience allows others to voice their opinions without fear of being harmed in the process. It allows people to explain their disagreement with a law or action in a peaceful way.
Peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society. Rather than having violent movements and harming citizens, it is better to peacefully resist. Once a violence is used, the resistance to the law becomes nulled. People tend to not follow a violence protester. Once a violent riot starts, chaos is everywhere. People forget what they are truly fighting for. They unconsciously run away with the fear of getting harmed and dare not to go back. A peaceful resistance on the other hand leads citizens to join and support. People are able to see what they are fighting for and their real intentions. They are able to stand and cause no problem to people passing by as they are showing their support through silent voices. Many famous activists and leaders are for nonviolence. Mahatma Gandhi, a primary leader of India’s independence