When looking over the philosophical approaches to social justices and thinking about how they fit into my worldview. I believe the one that fits my worldviews the most is the approach called liberal. The reason why I believe this is congruent to my views is because the principle of this approach is that there is economic liberty and political equality for all. I believe people should be treated equal no matter what their race, gender, height, sexual orientation and other traits are.
In my eyes, a gay person should not be treated less equal than a straight person. I believe two people of the same races should be treated equal and have the same opportunities. When I was thinking about what I wanted to write for this assignment I thought
…show more content…
The National Abortion Federation discusses how abortion is a valid and reproductive choice. The website also states national polls have consistently showed continued support for being choice when it comes to abortion. The bottom line when it comes to liberalism is that they believe everyone should be treated equally and fair and that they also have the right to make their own choices.
The philosophical approach that is incongruent with my worldview is without a doubt the one that is titled oligarchy. The principle of this approach is saying that a small group of people have power over everyone else and I don’t agree with that because if this small group of people have power that means they are making choices that they believe is right instead of what might be in the best interest of the person they are making the choice for. I believe this approach is still used in countries outside of the United States where a country decides who will marry who.
Princeton University defines oligarchy as a form of power structure that effectively rests with a small number of people. The definition continues to say that these people can be distinguished by royalty, wealth, family ties, corporate or military control. I don’t understand why so many people would total power to control a person’s life and to say that it’s for their own well-being is unfair and unequal. If a
Remember when you were a child, in the typical playground scenario, were you the bully, the victim, or the bystander?
First, let's start out with Oligarchy. There are few men who are in ruling power. They are very wealthy and enjoy a nice easy and simple life. The Oligarchs spent their day hunting and being apart of chariot races, at night they drink wine while laying on the couch and relaxing. But Oligarchy was not so simple as it looks, if you were not one of the few Oligarch you spent your day working all day long in the fields. The textbook says,” The hardworking poor saw the difference between there lives...and they thought it was very unfair,”(Frey,255). The difference of the two live styles never changed they only got worse. The Oligarchs only got richer while the poor only got more poor, and they started to hate the Oligarchs. Eventually the
Abortion is the deliberate termination of a human pregnancy. The subject of weather or not abortion should be permissible has came into question. A liberal's belief would be that a women has the right to decide what happens with her body. The decision to have an abortion is a personal choice of a women regarding her own body and the government should protect that right. A conservative's belief would be that abortion is the murder of a human being. That women should not be able to abort their unborn child. The liberal veiwpoint is correct in this topic of interest. A woman should have the right to have an abortion. If a child is not wanted then that child should be aborted. Why bring a child into the world that is not wanted and loved? If the
Oligarchy - a form of government where the power rests in the hands of a few individuals
Liberalism emphasizes the importance of Rights in society, and that society’s role is to protect these rights and put them first.
Abortion is an issue that has caused dispute within the government for many years. Is a woman correct in wanting the choice to decide what shall happen to her body? In an article entitled Eggs and Abortion: “Women Protective” Language Used by Opponents in Legislative Debates over Reproductive Health, written by Sujatha Jesudason and Tracy Weitz, this statement was made, "The liberal feminist approach emphasizes choice and autonomy, premised on a core belief in individual freedom and with the primary goal of minimizing government intervention in women’s reproductive decision-making." This is a declaration I identify strongly with. A woman's body cannot be a matter the government should be entirely involved in. The man or woman that signs anything disallowing the right to choose what happens inside my body or anyone else's would be making a
In America, we pride ourselves on being a democracy and having choices, when in fact, it is only a political illusion. In the Constitution of the United States (which we are all held accountable to abide by), it states that we are a republic with regard to the people’s desire to be a democracy, yet there is much evidence that leans towards America being an oligarchy. While a republic is a country which elects representatives to make government decisions on their behalf, an oligarchy is a system in which a small group of people controls the country. The debate of American being an oligarchy assumes that elites have power in many aspects of government, such as the Electoral College and the election process,
Liberals theory of justice is based on a belief in equality. Individualism, which is the central value for all liberals, implied a commitment to Foundation Equality. This is where
The Government of the United States of America is an oligarchy. Regardless of what children learn, from kindergarten to graduation, the belief instilled in people that they live under a democracy is an idealistic, and unrealistic view of current political affairs. Before delving into why the United States operates as a government dominated by the economic elite rather than a democracy though, agreeing on a definition for the latter is imperative. Following the classical teachings of Aristotle’s utopian view of democracy, in which each citizen has as much weight in the policy-making that governs as any other and still maintains the rights to live as a free individual, it is not controversial to suggest that America has never been a
A monarch is in control. You are being what to do by someone you do not even want ruling your country. What could you do? This is how your world works, it’s always worked like this, so why change it? Simply change it because you are unhappy with the way the world is, you deserve to enjoy the country you live in. That there, change the society, is exactly what the Enlightenment thinkers wanted to do. The Enlightenment thinkers are a group of people who found countless flaws in the way people decided to run the countries. Therefore, of all the Enlightenment thinkers, I believe John Locke, David Hume, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau impacted the world the most due to them having a full grasp on the ideologies of humanity.
Ever since the legalization of abortion in 1973, the conservatives and the liberals have been in a feud for many years, even decades. I however, believe that the topic and the actions and consequences of abortion are quite iniquitous. If you have performed an abortion, or even desire to have an abortion, I will not victimize you for it, and I will respect your decisions as to you being an individual. Abortion in my eyes shows that it is killing life, both in the mother’s point of view and killing the life of an unborn child who is still going through the embryonic stages. This could as well leading to putting the blood of the infant on the doctor’s hands, and the predator who have hunted down the victim’s hands. Abortion, as being a huge epidemic
Abortion rights are one of the most heatedly debates in society. There are many arguments for and against abortion. Each woman has the right to an abortion and the right to have a child. Women have the resources, rights, and respect to make reproductive health decisions that are best for themselves. (“Women’s”) We live in a free country and women should continue to have the choice to do whatever with their body, concerning women’s rights, health issues, and religious reasons.
In the modern world, most of the countries have democratic government, which means that decisions are made by the people, who rule and govern the state. However, there is not a single state that practices perfect democracy due to different reasons. Governments are too big, which makes it very complex for every citizen to have a voice in decisions. Or, governments are claimed to be democratic, but in practice they can be close to authoritarian or even totalitarian regimes where one person has a power to make and enforce laws. Political power is not allocated evenly among all members of society, so, in this or that way, governments tend to fall in the hands of the few, whom we can call the elite or the power elite.
Abortion has been one of the hottest topics concerning women’s health care and reproductive rights. Tune into any presidential debate and you’ll notice candidates spending as much time discussing the topic as immigration, foreign policy, climate change, and gun control. There are a lot of misconceptions about the pro-choice movement but it can be explained in very simple terms. Being pro-choice does not mean pro-abortion, it simply means accepting that women have the choice to choose what they do with their bodies, not the government or anyone else. I believe strongly in this issue and believe that we should look at our past and not go back to a time where women did not have the same rights as men over their bodies. We are trying to become equal, not return to an era of submission. No man or government should have the power to control a women’s body; every person has a right to his/her own body. Abortion should be kept an easy, accessible, safe, and legal option for all women regardless of beliefs. We should be taking strides forward toward equality, not steps back. In the mid-twentieth century, second wave feminists saw major struggles of women and sought to radically improve and change the security of women and reproductive rights. We have fought hard for many of the rights we have today, but everyday we are challenged by those who want to oppose and erase our efforts.
There are two sides to the abortion argument. Some say that the entire concept is immoral, while others argue that ethically there is nothing wrong with abortion. Mary Meehan, the author of “Why Liberals Should Defend the Unborn,” believes that abortion is immoral; she argues that the liberals willing to allow abortion will not make a stance on when a life of the fetus actually begins. Then, she backs up her argument with scientific evidence and points out that race has an effect of abortion. She also brings up that abortion can lead to discrimination against children with disabilities; after all, if a mother finds out her child is disabled and would rather not deal with it, she can simply abort the child. Amy Borovoy, the author of “Beyond Choice: A New Framework for Abortion?”, does not think abortion is immoral. She argues that women have the right to choose whether they want to terminate their pregnancy or not. In regards to the responsibility of delivering a baby, Borovoy backs up her argument by examining Japanese culture. The person that defends her argument better is Mary Meehan because she argues that liberals are unsure of their ethical stance, and pro-choice advocates discriminate the unborn but are for civil rights.