Importance Of Literature Review

A literature review is a type of APA paper that summarizes a scientific text about ones topic or question. A literature review focuses on a specific topic of interest and includes a critical analysis where one would compare different literature that relates to the subject of one’s own work. It normally includes a title page, introduction section, and a list of references. Many confuse a literature review with an annotated bibliography, but the difference between a literature review and an annotated bibliography is that an annotated bibliography only summarizes briefly about an article that one viewed while an annotated bibliography focuses specifically on a topic.

___V. Uses, Value, Strengths, Weaknesses, Professional Commentary in literature - This article is a meta-analysis of

Evidence is worked into the literature review effectively. The evidence and reasons are organized chronologically, and this organization is extremely important since the proposition focuses on the chronological progression of the argumentation style. One element I think is missing is a conclusion paragraph. The literature review seems to end abruptly on evidence. Score: 3

Literature Review: Research several types of information. Discuss several Pro and Cons positions by others and include at least 2 references for the Pro and Con arguments. This section should also clearly present both sides of the issue being discussed. Summarize the main issues on both sides by providing information on what the different sources say about the issue. Discuss at least two actual legal cases on your issue and their outcome.

Daymond et al (2011) were of opinion that literature review of a research should be done using a wide range of high quality literatures. On the other hand, Creswell (2007) argued that although an extensive literature review is important, outdated literatures could affect the result and findings of the study. The researchers offered unbiased and overt review by acknowledging the views of many authors and arguments about the problem of the study.

Cormack (2000) states that the literature review is a critical review of previous literature relating to the research topic. Therefore this section aims to provide the reader with an understanding of what the current state of evidence is in the selected area of study.

Reviewing scientific literature can help by establishing a connection to research topic, establish a connection to research and theory, and provides information about the procedures in other related studies. Reading multiple articles of investigative articles in a credible magazine would give the researcher a foundation in the technical aspects of academic writing. The Researcher can also gather information. This will allow the observer to expand on data previously gathered.

To develop a personal toolkit for critiquing research article, critical thinking that imposes intellectual standards will be the fundamental strategy employed (Elder & Paul, 2008; “Public Library,” 2013). Critical thinking will be employed to minimize bias from the literature review, which should provide a more solid springboard for the dissertation process. The intellectual standards that will be employed are clarity, accuracy, precision, relevance, depth, and breadth. Critical thinking should result in crucial questions and issues for potential research and the ability to articulate them clearly and accurately (Elder & Paul, 2008; “Public library,” 2013). In addition, before initiating a literature review, the focus, type, scope and academic discipline of articles will be determined (“Strategies for Writing,” n.d.). Focus will consider the thesis, predicament, or research question that will be researched. Type will determine if the search will highlight theory, methodology, or the kind of study, that is, qualitative or quantitative research. Scope will establish sources that will be considered such a range of research dates. Choosing an academic discipline such as business or psychology will help focus the search on literature germane to the dissertation goal (“Strategies for Writing,” n.d.).

Is the review thorough—does it include all of the major studies on the topic? Does it include recent research? Are studies from other related disciplines included, if appropriate? (25 points)

It is therefore vital for students to be able to evaluate and critique research papers in order for them to regulate the validity of a study and to apply theories to practise. A research critique measures the value and importance of a study and this is going to be determined by evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of the study (Brockopp & Tolsma, 2003, p. 400). Critical appraisal is the process of carefully and systematically examining research to judge its trustworthiness, and its value and relevance in a particular context (Astin 2009). The aim of this essay is to

The purpose of a literature review is to collect information on the proposed research topic, and to identify what research, if any, has already been done (McKinney, 2008). This will highlight what information is still needed in order to gain a better understanding of the topic (McKinney, 2008). It is important to know what is already understood about the topic, so that any research conducted will contribute to the field and further develop the existing knowledge (McKinney, 2008).

The results of the search of the professional literature had approximately 10,000 sources. However, most of the sources did not meet the criteria. For example, some did not contain the full articles while others did not meet the year of publication or where not peer reviewed. As a result, approximately half of the articles where not reviewed. The major limitation of the approach used was that most sources were not used. The implication for future evidence search would be to access more search engines and finding a way to acquire full articles.

Literature reviews are an examination of a study to determine its credibility or worthiness and information significance extracted from the existing research data (Wakefield, 2014). Literature reviews summaries, critically analyses, evaluates and clarifies the study authors’ ideas. The researched information provides the literature reviewer a summarize rational argument that defends and helps to explain the new research question, based on related policy and practice identified by

According to McMillan and Schumacher (2010), a review of literature should summarize and analyze previously reported research that is directly related to the current study. Overall,

According to Baridam (2001), it is not enough to review literature without presenting the studies by topic and determining how each of these topics relates to the researcher’s own study. A systematic presentation of the literature forms the foundation of the study.