Jefferson And Andrew Jackson

Conflicting views and contrasting ideologies have always existed throughout the history of United States politics. Alexander Hamilton, who led Federalist Party, believed that a powerful central government was necessary while Thomas Jefferson, who led the Jeffersonian Republican Party, favored an agrarian nation with most of the power left to the states. Although Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson were similar in that they both harbored good intentions and tried to keep the best interests in mind for the future of the United States, their policies were drastically different. Without doubt, both of their contrasting ideas served a vital role in forming the government.

If Andrew Jackson and Thomas Jefferson faced off, many would argue over which president was better leader and who was more effective. Jackson and Jefferson have more differences among them then they have alike, but they both stood in their beliefs and completed major events that helped with the writings of America’s history. If Jefferson or Jackson had an idea in mind that needed to be completed, they were very effective to get that job done in an efficient time. Both presidents held professions before office and out of the eight years both presidents held in office, many acts were created which aided both men to accomplish the ideas they had. Jackson’s daily life and attitude was considerably different compared to Jefferson but that didn 't stop him from getting his job done. Over all Jefferson was the better president and was more efficient thought his works.

Despite the disparity in the popularity ratings between the two presidents, John Adams and Abraham Lincoln are both indispensable figures in American history. In times of crisis, both of these men made big, consequential decisions to keep the country from falling apart. However, while Lincoln is commemorated for abolishing slavery and leading the Union in the Civil War, John Adams is remembered for the mistakes of his presidency—the Alien and Sedition Acts he issued that took away certain constitutional rights endowed to the American people. Both presidents thought they were doing what was necessary at the time to keep the United States from falling apart, but the contrasting approaches they used left opposite impressions. This can be contributed to the fact that almost all aspects of their lives, personal and professional, were opposite. So, while both presidents essentially did the same thing in saving America from falling apart, their reputations are so different now because of the way their lives and situations influenced the decisions they made.

James Madison and Andrew Jackson are some of America’s greatest presidents. They both did great things including being one of the Founding Fathers and being the most famous and well-known war hero of their time. James Madison and Andrew Jackson have many similarities and differences. For example, both of them served time in the military and they also both agreed with the removal of Native Americans. One of their major differences is that James Madison was born into a rich plantation owning family while Andrew Jackson was born into poverty. Through the information in this essay, you will see they also had alike and different ideas and personalities.

A president of the United States used to own many slaves on his own plantation in his entire life. After the declaration of independence from Great Britain Jefferson had a clear vision in this mind to support the institution of slavery. The political methods Jefferson used to oppose the slavery were:

Congress did so, but it was not enough for South Carolina. A month later a special convention met at the state capital and nullified the United States tariff acts of 1828 and 1832. Jackson ran for reelection that year without Calhoun and won. He declared, "The Constitution . . . forms a government, not a league"(Coit 17). He also stated that to annul a law was "incompatible with the existence of the Union," and "to say that any State may at pleasure secede . . . is to say that the United States is not a nation"(Coit 17). He meant that nullification or secession would be an act of war.

As a newborn nation, America had many tasks ahead of it, such as structuring a well functioning government, economy, and court system. Two men who had an extreme influence over these things were Alexander Hamilton and John Marshall. Both had brilliant ideas to bring forth and would eventually shape the nation to be a land of economic prosperity and fairness. Hamilton’s financial plan began the emergence of an economically superior country and ended in the creation of political parties that would change the face of the nation. John Marshall’s rulings resulted in precedents still followed today and interpreted the Constitution in a way that would transform the Judicial branch for the rest of history. Both of these men began the nation’s history in a way that is unparallel to most other leaders of the new nation.

Forty-three men have served as president over the United States. Of these men, there are very well-known ones, such as Abraham Lincoln and George Washington. One of the lesser known ones, Andrew Jackson, was recognized for two main things, protecting his country and paying off the national debt.

After the “era” of Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson, Andrew Jackson and Henry Clay became the new dominant forces in politics. They each brought their own respective ideas to politics and as a result, Jackson and Clay went head to head on many issues. The results of these debates still affect the United States to this day, showing the extent of the power that they possessed. The power of the federal government, the national bank, and states’ rights were among few of the issues that Andrew Jackson and Henry Clay debated. The debates of Andrew Jackson and Henry Clay resulted in the creation the American System, which changed the future of the United States and made it economically successful and prosperous.

The nullification crisis also allowed Jackson a way to promote democracy even further. When the states were met with a new tariff law, the North was very happy but the South started to question Jackson. Because Jackson understood the South’s concerns, he decided to lower the tariff (Section 14.5 “The Nullification Crisis”). Some states, mostly South Carolina, were still not pleased that there was any tariff at all; these states were filled with a lot of people who believed in state’s rights. When South Carolina wanted to retaliate, Jackson promised he would be forceful during the nullification crisis if anyone fought over it.

Andrew Jackson and Thomas Jefferson were both political figures that were very influential to the American government in many different ways. Both political figures created contrasting ideas about the American government. All in all both Andrew Jackson and Thomas Jefferson had different outlooks on different aspects that make up our government.

President Jackson wrote a letter responding to the nullification of South Carolina in December 10, 1832. South Carolina wanted to reduce their tariffs, and by doing so will cause conflict with the constitution, resulting in a difficult decision for Jackson to make. Jackson’s views on the nullification was as expected for a president, he supported the constitution and did not want any conflict unless absolutely needed. His letter is about his view points on the nullification and what is needed to be done to handle the situation with South Carolina.

Unit Four Exam Essay Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson both believed that they represented the interests of the “common man”. Both were a part of the Democratic Party, and had many similarities and differences. Jefferson was more of an advocate for states’ rights over national intuitions, while Jackson focused more on economic policy, such as dealing with the Second Bank of the United States. They also came from very different backgrounds; Jefferson was a wealthy farmer who wanted to protect the interests of the wealthy, while Jackson could more easily blend in with the common people. However, both men owned slaves and both opposed the Bank of the United States.

Misfortune often contributes to the making of a man. In the cases of Andrew Jackson and Robert Matthews, this is especially true. Both men were orphaned at a young age and both took very different paths that made history. Andrew Jackson grew stronger and became an influential president. He brought the nation together after the Revolution and the War of 1812 and restored it to a state of economic stability. Robert Matthews created a cult-like religion and ruled over his “kingdom” with an iron fist. His religious kingdom crumbled quickly because of its ridiculous rules, shady practices, and unlawful deeds. The economic, cultural, and religious changes of the nineteenth century shaped the paths that both men took. Matthews handled these changes by seeking a new freedom and individual choice. Jackson handled the same changes by taking the opportunity they offered to become anything you could imagine. People in the nineteenth century were faced with economic, social, and religious changes and sought atonement, freedom, economic stability and prosperity. Matthias and Jackson both based their campaigns on these desires. Matthews and Jackson had two very different attitudes towards others and this determined their successes and failures.

George Washington was the first president of the United States, and because of this he played a significant role in influencing the role of politics and implementation of the Constitution. His achievements carved the way and set guidelines for the future presidents to be. Andrew Jackson was the seventh president, and he is famously referred to as the people’s resident. Abraham Lincoln is one of the greatest presidents to have ever served the country. Lincoln arguably achieved more than any other president in his era. The purpose of the paper is to show the contributions of Abraham Lincoln, Andrew Jackson and George Washington on aspects such as proper use of vetoes and spoil system highlighting their political personalities.