Treaty Signing at Medicine Lodge Creek is the title given to two different renderings by two different artists. At first glance, it is immediately clear that the pictures are very different. The work of John Taylor is presented in a way that appears sophisticated and from a trained artist. On the other hand, Howling Wolf’s drawing is less sophisticated and the artist is apparently untrained in art. The title of the two art pieces identifies the purpose of the meeting as a treaty signing. Both artists represent Indians and white men who have gathered for a meeting. John Taylor and Howling Wolf offered their drawings ten years apart, Taylor first then Wolf. While looking at the two images of Treaty Signing at Medicine Lodge Creek, each artist …show more content…
The artist paints many onlookers around the central group. Another noticeable difference in the two pictures is that Wolf includes women in his picture which relates back to his cultural understanding of Indians. Taylor’s picture is definitely representational while Wolf’s is abstract. John Taylor’s work is more realistic when compared to the art of Howling Wolf. Visualizing reality in the two pieces, is simple. Taylor has a much more realistic piece while Wolf’s abstract art, the viewer has a more difficult time visualizing the actual event. Wolf’s work, at first glance, appears to be childlike and he uses the bright primary colors while Taylor uses the black and white. The composition of the art work describes the arrangement of the visual elements of people, landscapes, space in the pictures and the organization of the elements. In Taylor’s work one finds the use balance and contrast to emphasize his black and white picture. However, Wolf uses color and form to generate a purposefully abstract picture. Thus, composition is the placement of the visual elements in each work of art. Although the two drawings have the same subject matter, the treaty signing at Medicine Creek Lodge, they both have different appearances, meanings, and viewpoints. The point of view of two different cultures focuses contrast on the art. The only thing which can be said about the two renditions of
In comparison to John Taylor’s Treaty Signing at Medicine Lodge Creek, created in October 1867, was made right after the treaty signing. However, there are other depictions, made almost a decade later. One prime example is Howling Wolf’s piece, made from 1875-1878. This art was a more abstract depiction, approaching on the whole meeting, rather than just a gathering. Howling Wolf’s piece shows a more ethnocentric approach, providing women with their backs facing away from the viewer, with a red stripe down the back of their head. On the other hand, Taylor’s piece resembles a more naturalistic and realistic event, showing the gathering of the different groups, and completing
John Taylor’s work of art, Treaty Signing at Medicine Creek Lodge, may seem to be portraying very much alike affair, however, there are numerous differences from Howling Wolf’s work of genius, Treaty Signing at Medicine Creek Lodge. I believe that Taylor’s work tends to be more figurative as it represents the naturalistic of substance which can be distinguished clearly. Wolf’s art piece turned out to be more conceptual such that the objects expresses more on the non realistic. In addition, Taylor’s work can also be described as more of a sketch form possibly used by pen or pencil. On the other hand, Wolf's drawings are more of freedom of lines where it seems more of children's art work. The landscapes of these two are definitely differ from
Aboriginal art has many inspiring aspects such as the link that it has to the past of Aboriginal people, kinship the dreaming, land and reconciliation. Charlie Colbung is the artist behind a large beautiful acrylic painting exhibited in the Plantagenet community resource centre, in Mount Barker Western Australia. Colbung’s painting is called ‘Past to Present’ and represents the journey to reconciliation of both Indigenous and non-Indigenous people. Full of depth, texture, colour and numerous artistic elements to entice audiences to engage and analyse his lovely art work as well as critically reflect on the art and the meaning behind the painting. Charlie Colbungs painting Past to Present is a beautiful example of Aboriginal art work.
The only thing we can be sure about in the Treaty Signing at Medicine Creek Lodge, by John Taylor and Howling Wolf is that they “contain the same overt content-that is the peace treaty signing”. (Sayre) How can both artists be so far apart in their renderings and what influences affected their works? Was it the time between the two artworks, cultural differences, or form?
-The visual displays the story of how aborigines were once locked up and then try to rise up.
Through distinctive images composers develop interest, drawing the responder in and thus providing insight into the experiences of others. This is demonstrated in Amanda Lohrey’s novella ‘Vertigo’ as Luke and Anna find themselves in a new and disorientating environment as they attempt to build a new life and in the ‘The Red Tree’ composed by Shaun Tan, through the nameless girl’s journey as she attempts to find herself and her place in the world. Meaning created by distinctive images creates interest thus permitting the responder to gain a greater understanding on how the experiences help shape one’s self.
One final illustration that had a positive advantage was the symbol of the cow. This symbol is an extremely simple and non- extravagant drawing but I feel that it really stands for a lot. In the book it says that in 1868- 1869 Texas cattle were brought into the country. I believe that this symbol was an illustration of trade for the Native Americans. I think it marked the beginning of their trade because later on in the book there is a document of how the Indians go on to trade cattle for guns with other tribes. The image on page 48 really shows the trade use at its full potential by illustrating the trade within tribes. Trade is a very important in any civilization and is always an important advantage.
The arrival of the ‘foreigners’, as referred to by the Native Americans, turned a new stone in Native American diplomacy. No longer did they have to only deal with neighboring tribes, as they were forced to endeavor into politics with strangers who were looking to take their land. The first relationship between the pilgrims and the Native Americans began with the Wampanoag tribe. The relations between the two groups paved the view that the pilgrims had towards the Indians. The decently friendly relationship that stood between the two groups was short lived as the pilgrims felt that the indians were getting in the way of their expansion; and shortly after the friendship ceased to exist (Bell, 37).
I believe color, and in part lack of, is very important to this masterpiece. Cole colors the river valley light green and light brown to show vibrancy and cultivation of the cleared fields. He colors the forest dark green and eliminates colors in the shattered tree trunks and rugged cliffs to show the natural wonder of the untouched forest. These differences in color show how man is destroying the natural wilderness in favor of agricultural advancement.
In John Berger’s essay “Ways of Seeing,” he shares his view on how he feels art is seen. Mr. Berger explores how the views of people are original and how art is seen very differently. By comparing certain photographs, he goes on to let his Audience, which is represented as the academic, witness for themselves how art may come across as something specific and it can mean something completely different depending on who is studying the art. The author goes into details of why images were first used, how we used to analyze art vs how we do today, and the rarity of arts. He is able to effectively pass on his message by using the strategies of Rhetoric, which include Logos, Pathos, and Ethos.
Wohaw draws himself with color pencils in Between Worlds, standing in traditional garb, a loincloth made of two long strips of cloth that reach his ankles. He wears his hair long and holds out a tomahawk in boths hands holding off a buffalo and a bull. One of his feet stands on a miniaturized house and field while his other foot stands on miniaturized herd of buffalo. On that side of the page there stands a teepee --which is much larger than the house, reaching his to thigh in height. Above his drawn self who faces the bull he has written his name, above which he has drawn a stylized sun. In the left side of picture on the side of the buffalo is the moon and star. The bull and buffalo seem to be blowing at Wohaw and he seems to be holding them off. Though the picture is not drawn with much technical skill the meaning behind it is potent. Caught between cultures of a Plains tribe and the Euro-American dominating society. The picture seems to indicate that he identifies, or is being identified more strongly with his Native American heritage, yet both sides to be actively at odds. There is no indication of peace to be for between the two. Euro-Americans were invasive and made decisions for Native American peoples without their consent, this reflects in Native American art.
The landscape paintings from Picturing the Americas share a colonial past of Indigenous people and their land, natural resources, and wealth that was taken from their ancestors by Western settlers. They display a variety of Canadian art, reflecting historical events and the “New World”, exemplifying from the United States, Mexico and Central, as well as South America. One artist Prilidiano Pueyrredón, although his main focus was not about the settlers or colonized land, reflected those matters greatly through his art. This artist’s work protrudes through landscapes, natural resources and natural details but through his work we go face to face with colonization. A piece done by this artist, The Rodeo, wakens the view of settlers on Indigenous
The Big Blackfoot River wasn’t just some river to the McClain’s family and became a way to stay in touch with one another. The impact it had on the brother’s relationship with their father, their own relationship, and Paul’s life in Montana made the river a sacred place for them. The shared many memories, laughter, and love on the Big Blackfoot
In this painting by George Catlin titled “Assinneboine Chief before and after Civilization” it shows a very proud Assinneboine Chief standing straight and proud. His clothing expresses his Indian culture as he is dressed in leggings and shirt made of mountain goat skin, and finished with a pictured robe of buffalo hide over his right shoulder. Moccasins covered his feet and his tribal headdress decorated his head allowing his long hair to blend with the feathers of his headdress. In his left hand is his long pipe which he would smoke with those with whom he would want to make peace. The background which is painted in a lighter hue then