preview

Lab Report Hypothesis

Decent Essays

Restate Question & Hypothesis Question: How does the hardness of a mineral affect the rate of stream abrasion according to the change in mass of the mineral per minute? Hypothesis: If the mineral has a high hardness, then the rate of steam abrasion would be lower because minerals with high hardness have higher tenacity, meaning they are harder to break down. Evaluates original hypothesis using data Based on the collected data, my hypothesis has proven to be somewhat correct. If you look at the table and graph above, you can see that the majority of the harder minerals have a lower stream abrasion rate than the minerals with a lower hardness. An example of this is Gypsum. Gypsum had a hardness of two and an abrasion rate of 0.1 g/min. An example of a softer mineral is Topaz, which had a hardness of eight, and an abrasion rate of 0.02 g/min. Those examples proved my hypothesis to be correct, but there were a few outliers that countered it. One of these was Quartz. Quartz has a hardness of 7, but still managed to have an abrasion rate of 0.29 g/min. …show more content…

For example, Chalcopyrite had 15 pieces and an abrasion rate of 0.1 g/min. Also, Quartz had 91 pieces and a abrasion rate of 0.29 g/min. Meanwhile, Calcite had 1 pieces and an abrasion rate of 0.01 g/min. Another pattern I noticed was that minerals with fracture tended to have higher abrasion rates. For example, Apatite has fracture and an abrasion rate of 0.62 g/min. Quartz also has fracture and, like stated previously, had a 0.29 g/min steam abrasion rate. Meanwhile, Topaz has cleavage and had a 0.02 abrasion

Get Access