Leadership Philosophy Of Leadership And Leadership

I want others to be able to see my leadership philosophy at work. To do this, it is important that I be able to connect with those I seek to lead, as “The Relational Leadership Model” states, “Relationships are the focal point of the leadership process” (Komives, Lucas, & McMahon, p. 74). One way I hope to develop a relationship with my followers is by “Modeling the Way” (Kouzes, Posner, 2008). I will do this by clarifying my values and leading by example. Clarifying values is important because “To earn and sustain personal credibility, one must be able to clearly articulate deeply held beliefs” (Kouzes, Posner, 2008, p. 29). By clarifying my values, those I seek to lead will understand my mission and will believe I have a goal in mind. Leading by

My leadership philosophy stems from my experience in the Army. As a leader, I believe in honesty, commitment, and respect for others. All responsibilities should be carried out in a timely manner. My main priority is the well-being of my Soldiers. My Soldiers can expect me a leader that is caring, dedicated, and upholds the standards.

My Leadership philosophy is influenced by President Abraham Lincoln and his leadership style which resounds with me on how one should act and leader others. In fact, his willingness to get out of the office and circulate around the people is one of the foundations of his leadership style and is resonated by Master Chief Cantrell as he calls all chiefs to get out from behind our desks and get to know our people. This trait along with his character as it relates to honesty and integrity align directly with how I believe a leader should act. Leadership for me is not just telling people what needs to be done, but in order to be an effective leader we must get to know those we lead and above all we must be honest with everyone around us, both

At the core of my leadership philosophy is the belief in continued learning. Only through evaluated learning can we truly become good leaders. A leader is a collection of all the experiences that they have encountered in their lifetime. A leader is able to evaluate each experience to ascertain something about themselves with each one. One should be able to learn how to improve actions and interactions with those that they interact with.

How I define leadership has mostly to do with 27 years of service in the Army and 20 of those years spent as a Non-Commissioned Officer. Simply put, I believe leadership is the balancing of two competing priorities, the accomplishment of the mission and the welfare of the people that are in your charge. Others can probably think up a million of other subcategories that go into defining leadership, but I believe those are the two over arching things a leader has to do. I see those two priorities being symbiotic because without the people I can’t accomplish the mission but without the mission I don’t need the people.

According to Webster’s Dictionary, leadership is the power or ability to lead other people, the act or instance of leading. I believe that Leadership is an art, the art to get others to follow and accomplish a common goal or task in a harmonic manner. A leader can be shown in all kinds of shapes and forms. To be a great leader many people believe it consists of modeling the way, inspiring a shared vision, enabling others to act, and encouraging the heart. Over the course of me learning how to become a better leader and being in leadership roles, I’ve learned that all these are very necessary to be a great leader.

I believe a personal leadership philosophy is developed through experiences as both a follower and a leader. Leadership skills are gained in many ways such as learning from the successful methods and mistakes of others, constructive criticism from followers and leader colleagues alike and remaining current in leadership literature. I have developed my theory based on personal encounters with positive and negative leadership experiences which include leading by example, listening and adapting to your followers needs and lastly, including followers in times of significant change.

Leadership Philosophy If 100 people were asked to define leadership, there would be 100 definitions that were similar but different. These similarities and differences could widely vary or be close in nature. Nonetheless, people are who they are because of their upbringing, beliefs, morals and principles. Additionally, our senses allow us to do many things, including, defining leadership.

My leadership philosophy is all about people, to elaborate on this principle I believe that Soldiers are the Army’s most precious assets as a fighting force. I believe that leadership is treating Soldiers with respect to influence them in order to achieve their full potential and strive to provide them with mentoring along the way.

I developed my philosophy on good leadership through watching the actions of both great and poor leaders. The best assignment in my career was the Administrative Assistant to COL James W. Runyon, who served as the Joint Chief of Staff for the West Virginia Army National Guard. COL Runyon’s leadership style was strong, compassionate and professional. His philosophies included “treat our Soldiers how you want your family treated”, “what is fair for one is fair for everyone”, and “if you do how you always have, you will get what you always got”. COL Runyon made Soldiers feel appreciated, no matter how big or small the task.

Leadership is "the behaviour of an individual when he is directing the activities of a group towards a shared goal". (Hemphill and Coons, 1957, p.7)

Leadership is something that can be different for each person who practices it. We all have different ideas and different backgrounds and skill sets that we can use to make us better leaders.

What leadership is and what it means to be a leader is not always clear and definitive. Leadership often is in the eyes of the beholder, and like most abstract concepts, there are many approaches to its understanding and application. Most leaders have different approaches to leadership and most people that aren’t leaders have different definitions of what leadership is. Often people define leadership as one thing or just a couple of things. Leadership is not simply one thing but a collection of traits, characteristics and proper application of certain principles that work in concert to achieve a specific mission or goal. Leadership is influence, vision, service, communication and conviction working together in concert towards a specific task or goal. Without the proper cultivation and development of these traits, a leader will find it hard to be effective and progressive.

There are many definitions of leadership propagated by many scholars in the leadership sector which further makes it difficult to fully define. The ever changing roles in the organizations and society in general keep twisting the meaning of leadership and its applicability. It is for this reason that many theories have been formed by researchers in an attempt to fully understand or come up with a unified definition of leadership. In simple terms, leadership can be defined as the process of guiding or directing a group of people who have been brought together and share a common goal or vision.

The leader must inspire engage employees, prescribe a common vision, choose a direction to take and encourage them to follow him. The whole team needs to continue and share the same goals and objectives. One could say that this style of leadership is the most effective of all, especially in large organizations. Nelson Mandela was one of the greatest leaders in history, great freedom fighter and