I am writing this letter to insist that I should be allowed to get my permit and then my licence.
The reasons provided in the letter regarding the permit/licence are to be considered and accepted without hesitation. The primary concern is the transportation from one place to another. It takes a significant amount of time to travel between destinations, and expecting one person to drive to all those places and arrive on time is extremely inconvenient. There is often traffic and accidents on the freeway that make transportation difficult and time consuming. Also, take into consideration that Anthony sometimes, though not often, has places he wishes to go to but cannot because of time constraints. Allowing me to drive will open more availability
…show more content…
Allowing me to get my permit gives you more time to sleep because I could drive not only myself, but also Anthony to school. You do not get much sleep, so by allowing this you could get a good few more hours of sleep. With how much stress you have been under, it is essential that you get as much sleep as possible. The drive from home to Xavier/ASA is extremely far. The traffic on the way there and home is a nightmare. Also, after dropping off both of us, you need to drive all the way back home. You make about four trips everyday. If you allow me to drop Anthony and myself off, you will save gas because I would not be making an extra round to go home/come back.
Many students have already been allowed to receive their permit/licence, where as I, one of the few, do not have it. Though many have told you stories about their child and driving accidents, equal amounts, if not more, have told you stories of the benefits of allowing their child to drive. It is not a matter of whether or not you trust me to drive safely, but of whether or not it is safe enough to allow driving in general. There are many reasons why it is dangerous to allow this, but cars have technology that has saved many people’s
One reason California should implement this law is because it gives students an incentive to work hard and get better grades. When teenagers get their driver's licenses they have a whole new sense of freedom. When this privilege is revoked, many teens don't want to have to rely on other people to transport them places
In secondary school, kids have a couple of choices of getting the chance to class: having their guardians drive them, taking the transport, or driving themselves. The most simple alternative is for them to drive themselves to class. Being an authorized driver is a gigantic obligation and is expected to show youthful understudies how to handle obligation.
Getting your driver’s license is a coming-of-age time in a person’s life. It is taking another step to becoming an adult. In the article, they suggested that grades and attendance could make or break your privilege to drive on and off campus.
Recently there has been a debate whether California should pass a ‘No Pass/No Drive’ law. This law states that if a student under 18 who skips classes too much or drops out of school would not be allowed to drive. Many people think that this law is unfair and should not take effect because it doesn’t guarantee that students will get better in school, but that is simply untrue. In fact, I believe this law should be brought into California because it motivates students to get better grades and will lower the crime rate of California.
For a while I always had my parents or friends give me rides to places. But after I turned 15 I started to think and I decided that I wanted to get my permit. The first try I didn’t get it. At that time it made me not want to get my permit because I didn’t want to fail over and over again and again.
Driving has become an integral part of today's society.The ability to commute long distances and perform daily tasks quickly (such as picking up food at the grocery store) is evidence of our advancement in technology.Naturally earning the ability to drive is a cornerstone in anyone's life,"sixteen" being an age well remembered for this new-found knowledge. This changed however when Oregon passed a law limiting these privileges called "graduated licensing" - and although its intentions are well meaning graduated licensing's result is far from perfect.
Recently, there has been debate over whether we should promote the law ‘no pass/no drive’. This law states that students under the age of 18 must maintain idle grades and tardies if they are to receive their driver's license. Several schools from around the country have already enforced the law, schools from places such as in West Virginia and Kentucky. Many disagree with the policy, and say that it won’t guarantee any improvement among students grades. However, I believe that it will not only motivate students to be on time, and earn better grades, but also help them learn that with privilege comes responsibility. I think this law has the potential to improve students grades and attendance throughout.
Responsibility is key in life. Learning to drive teaches a great need for responsibility, because if it is not taken serious then a person’s life could become endangered. Some will say that 16 year olds should not be allowed to
Regardless of the circumstances or reasoning, these should not prevent a student from gaining their driver’s license. Driving and academic scores do not correlate. Some may see academic scores as a percentage of how well one is able to learn. However, everyone has different strengths. For example, a student who scores well in math may not score well in English, and vice versa. The same thing applies to driving. A student with a 90% average may not be a good driver, and the “good” driver isn’t necessarily performing well in school. Lastly, driving has its own benefits. It is a lifelong skill that makes our lives easier. It makes it easier for us to go from one place to another without relying on others or public transportation. Learning to drive teaches us how to be responsible at a young age. For example, parents of those students who have already obtained their G2 license may ask their son or daughter to pick up groceries at the grocery store, pick up or drop off their younger siblings to their sporting events, or to drive themselves to and from school. This prepares the student, who would be 16 to 18 years of age, to become more independent and less
Driving is a big part of everyone’s life. It helps people get places for jobs, school, appointments, and etcetera. In my case, I was trying to get my license so that I could drive myself to college. It was a goal of mine to have my license. My goal was to get my license during high school so that
Some students cant learn how two drive because they are away at collage and there parents are not there to teach them how to drive that’s y you should not raise the driving age two 18. If you raise the driving age to 18 it will be hard on students because they need to get to work they need to get school and if they can’t get to work they will get fired and then it would be really hard on them
Teens should not be permitted to drive until they are 18 years old. They should be able to drive on a temporary permit when they are 16 years old and use it until they turn 18 years old. This permit would allow them to drive only during daylight hours and with a parent/guardian. This would enable the young drivers to become more experienced. The eight hours of drivers training with your instructor is not enough. These teens need to get a feel for the road and learn to drive defensively. If you do not know how to operate a vehicle responsibly, it could be used as a deadly weapon. These young drivers are hurting themselves and other innocent people, because of their lack of experience and their irresponsibility.
I write this essay to prove to my readers that requiring a parenting license has more pros than cons.
In responding , one can say that teenagers always complain about the ¡§grown up¡¨ world and its rules. Teens find it rather hard to be part of the grown up worl until they have the licence to go out on their own. Basically, the whole concept of graduated licencing is not so complicated. There are only a few changes: 1) There must be a fully licensed driver beside you with at least four years of driving experience in the G1 level. 2) There is a year waiting period between the G1 level and G2 level. 3) New drivers may only drive in cities, not on highways, and only during daytime hours. Even though there is a 1 month waiting period between G1 level and G2 level, it can be shortened to 8 months by taking a driver¡¦s insurance training course. During this course, the driver will learn more about techniques on driving, and it will cost less when getting car insurance later on.
Have you ever thought about earning your driver's license ? Well that’s what the ‘No Pass/ No Drive’ law consists of. The ‘No Pass/ No Drive’ law is to help students focus on school like get good grade and participate in their classes all to end up getting a good education and earning the privilege to drive. In my opinion I think that the ‘no pass/ drive’ law is a good thing. The idea of students getting good grades in order to drive is something to think about. I say this because if students don’t get good grades they won’t know anything, 75% of dropout students commit crimes and they will have to depend on someone to take them places. Who wants to be dependable for picking someone up and dropping them off ? I wouldn’t want to be and I’m sure their family members and friends wouldn’t either. This is why I think the ‘No pass/ No drive’ law is a good law.