During the metric measurement lab, the objective, also known as the problem statement, was to take measurements of the length, volume, mass, temperature, and circumference of different substances. In addition, we were to convert these measurements using the factor label method and complete calculations based on the measurements we took at the six different stations of the lab. Furthermore, we were directed to compare and contrast our calculations with other groups in the classroom.
For station one, we were directed to calculate the dimensions of two rectangular boxes. In order to do this, the materials we needed were a ruler and the two boxes. First, we measured the length, width, and height of the first block using the metric side of the
…show more content…
For example, our group obtained a mass of 45.52 grams or 45,520 milligrams for the ball in station six. However, another group obtained a mass of 43.50 grams or 43,500 milligrams. This difference most likely occurred due to the fact that students did not fully wait to see if the two lines on the triple beam balance were exactly matched up. Through our eyes, it may seem like they are lined up perfectly, but in reality, there could be the slightest difference that we do not notice. While we measured the width of the table at station three, we noticed a difference in the measurement. The difference in the measurement was 0.1 centimeters, one millimeter, or 0.001 meters. A factor that could account for this difference is that when we measured using the metric ruler, we had to constantly move the ruler down the table in order to obtain the full measurement. During the process of doing that, it is very possible, that a millimeter or two could have been added or cut off while we were continuously moving the ruler. In station two, the directions stated not to splash any water out of the graduated cylinder when we put the rock in because it would alter the results for the measurement. For example, if a few milliliters of water spilled out while placing the rock in, the calculation for the measurement of the rock would also be a few millimeters less; therefore, it would decrease the accuracy of the measurement of the volume of the rock. In station five, the measurement of the circumference of the ball for our group was 20.00 centimeters, 200.0 millimeters, or 0.2000 meters. However, for another group in the classroom, the measurements and calculations were 22.00 centimeters, 220.0 millimeters, or 0.2200 meters. The difference in the measurement was most likely caused by the difference in the point from where the string was wrapped around since there was no
Purpose: To learn about the international system of units (SI), to become familiar with common lab equipment and techniques, to gain proficiency in determining volume, mass, length, and temperature of a variety of items using common laboratory measurement devices, to learn to combine units to determine density and concentration, and to use laboratory equipment to create serial dilutions and determine the density and concentration of each dilution.
Purpose: To become familiar with the International System of Units and common laboratory equipment and techniques. To learn how to determine volume, mass, length, and temperature of a wide variety of items. To learn how to calculate density and concentration of dilutions.
The calculated volume used the length x the width x the height to get its volume. I feel the measurement method would be more accurate as it is using exact measurements. Archimedes Principal could possibly be flawed if not done exactly right.
There are several sources of error to this experiment due to random and systematic errors. The only source of random error was the measurement that we took through the graduated cylinder which was only accurate to the nearest 1%. We took the largest error from this one percent, which was +/- 3. The largest relative error this yielded was only 3%, so this did not affect how precise this experiment was too much. We can still make this more precise by making the masses of the water larger. For example if we started the masses at 300mL and went up by 50mL, the largest error this would yield would be 2% due to the largest error being +/- 5. This would cause smaller errors in the amount of water.
Find from the “Starting” and “stopping” locations of where you are going to measure. i.e., I am going to have Charles lay down and I will measure from the bottom of his feet to the top of his head
Introduction: Accuracy and precision were the major aspects of the lab. Accuracy is how close the average of the measured values are to the actual value. Precision is the closeness of repeated measurements. In the lab, the aim was to get as close as possible with both accuracy and precision when determining the mass and volume of the spheres. The mass was determined by weighing the spheres on the Analytical Scale and Triple Beam Balance Scale. The volume is determined by measuring with a ruler and by water displacement. The standard
Place the object of your choosing on the triple beam balance's plate. 3. Use the weights to get the other side of the scale on zero to get the mass. 4. Next, place the object in a graduated cylinder filled with
Seven various household objects were chosen to measure using a digital gram scale. Each object’s mass was estimated by lab students and recorded in data table 4. A quarter, ball point pen, rubber bulb, large paper clip, green crayon, house key and a copper penny masses were estimated and recorded in data table 4. Each object was placed on the scale individually and its actual measurement was recorded in data table 4. As we started estimating the household objects we were often not correct in our estimations. As we measured more and more objects, we got better in our estimations by comparing objects with known masses and comparing them with the unknown
Throughout lab one we were introduced to many different forms of measurement, whether its using a ruler too measure length, a digital scale to measure weight, and also many different sized and shaped flasks to measure different volumes. Another key measurement of this lab was to teach the
Luminosity is the brightness of a star. It is used to measure the star’s distance from a planet the brighter the star the closer it is.
Also, we need to understand words like meniscus, parallax, the difference between accuracy and precision, the use of a metric system, the use of scientific notation, and etc. Furthermore, the purpose for doing this experiment is to understand why measurements is not precise and how to describe uncertainty and error. This is important because we’re going to face the same problem every time we do the same type of lab, and when the
The purpose of this particular lab is to learn the magnitude scale and more about an alternate measurement astronomers use to designate the luminosity and apparent brightness of stars. When the Greek scientist Hipparcos determined the brightness of stars he did it by eye. The first stars that came out at night were the first importance and today we call those stars “first magnitude”. After the year’s astronomers start realizing how some stars are brighter than others and that's when they form a magnitude scale. Magnitudes and brightness are related to each other, but magnitude scale is a difference subtractive scale and the apparent brightness makeup a multiplicative scale. I believe that it's important to do this lab because we can understand
For my Senior Project, I am submitting a lab which I completed in AP Chemistry. In the Gravimetric Analysis of Calcium and Hard Water Lab my lab partner and I conducted an experiment in which we calculated the mass of the precipitate formed by the mass of the isolated analyte present in the reactants before the reaction. During our experiment, we used resources such as graduated cylinders, sodium carbonate, bunsen burners, an analytical balance, watch glass, filter paper, a funnel, tongs, and an oven. The lab equipment allowed us to effectively precise measurements of water hardness. For example, the analytical balance gave us a more precise measurement than a triple beam balance would. The temperature of the burners as well as the temperature
We have secured two meter stick end to end together to a table zero facing downwards and released the balls from three different heights, three times each. I asked my partner to look where the ball bounces and recorded the bounce heights in the table below. Tennis Ball Drop Height (cm) 1st drop Bounce height (cm) 2nd drop bounce height (cm) 3rd drop bounce height (cm) Average Bounce Height 50 27.6 32.1 30.2 30.0 100 54.5 55.5 57.4 55.8 150 89.0 87.5 30.2 88.0
Students will hypothesize as to whether an object can be made heavier with different substances.