preview

Metric Measurement Lab Report

Decent Essays

During the metric measurement lab, the objective, also known as the problem statement, was to take measurements of the length, volume, mass, temperature, and circumference of different substances. In addition, we were to convert these measurements using the factor label method and complete calculations based on the measurements we took at the six different stations of the lab. Furthermore, we were directed to compare and contrast our calculations with other groups in the classroom.
For station one, we were directed to calculate the dimensions of two rectangular boxes. In order to do this, the materials we needed were a ruler and the two boxes. First, we measured the length, width, and height of the first block using the metric side of the …show more content…

For example, our group obtained a mass of 45.52 grams or 45,520 milligrams for the ball in station six. However, another group obtained a mass of 43.50 grams or 43,500 milligrams. This difference most likely occurred due to the fact that students did not fully wait to see if the two lines on the triple beam balance were exactly matched up. Through our eyes, it may seem like they are lined up perfectly, but in reality, there could be the slightest difference that we do not notice. While we measured the width of the table at station three, we noticed a difference in the measurement. The difference in the measurement was 0.1 centimeters, one millimeter, or 0.001 meters. A factor that could account for this difference is that when we measured using the metric ruler, we had to constantly move the ruler down the table in order to obtain the full measurement. During the process of doing that, it is very possible, that a millimeter or two could have been added or cut off while we were continuously moving the ruler. In station two, the directions stated not to splash any water out of the graduated cylinder when we put the rock in because it would alter the results for the measurement. For example, if a few milliliters of water spilled out while placing the rock in, the calculation for the measurement of the rock would also be a few millimeters less; therefore, it would decrease the accuracy of the measurement of the volume of the rock. In station five, the measurement of the circumference of the ball for our group was 20.00 centimeters, 200.0 millimeters, or 0.2000 meters. However, for another group in the classroom, the measurements and calculations were 22.00 centimeters, 220.0 millimeters, or 0.2200 meters. The difference in the measurement was most likely caused by the difference in the point from where the string was wrapped around since there was no

Get Access