Motivation And Performance Management : The Concepts Of Organizational Behavior Essay

Herzberg’s two factor theory of motivation at the workplace shows the difference between two factors of motivation. The two factors being satisfiers, which are the main causes for job satisfaction (motivation), from hygiene factors which are the main causes for job dissatisfaction (demotivation to stay in the job). Examples of motivating factors are achievement, recognition, responsibility and the work itself. Hygiene factors include: working conditions, salary, relationship with colleagues, supervision, etc. An organisation needs to influence satisfiers through performance management using range of tools such as: job descriptions, supervision, performance appraisals, continuous development/training, rewards and career development.

This consists of things such as achievement of higher market share and profit maximisation consequently due to an individual’s performance. Processes that are used to motivate employees will affect employee’s willingness to remain with an organisation. Performance management is vital within most organisations and is seen as a crucial ingredient in motivating employees and can be explained by various motivational theories.

Performance management relates to an organization’s ability to implement a system to evaluate and advance employee performance. Achieving peak performance requires consistency, clear objectives, and constructive employee evaluation. According to Mithas, Ramasubbu, & Sambamurthy (2011), an organization must design the performance management system based on extensive research about the organization’s mission, and then properly communicate the purpose of the system to employees, stakeholders, and decision makers. After the performing the research, the information should be used to establish the appropriate performance management specialized for the organization. In addition, an effective performance management system should align

The relationship between motivation and performance management is important as they work simultaneously with each other. Motivation is the key to an individual's degree of willingness to exert and maintain their efforts towards the organisational goals. Motivation levels are likely to have an effect on performance. If an individual has high motivation, it is likely to increase their performance. However this may not always be the case. Motivation is about the factors, which links into how organisation uses performance management to get better results from their staff by strategically encouraging the performance within its business. If employees are highly motivated they will perform better, and will co-operate collectively to improve the standards which would lead to a sense of achievement creating greater motivation.

Whilst a lot of employees are motivated develop and perform better, there are some employees who are not. These employees tend to do just enough to keep anyone from noticing them. This is the area where performance management falls down and it is up to the manager to find ways to motivate

This relationship between motivation and performance management can be complex and individual to each employee. There are numerous motivational theories all of which have elements of authenticity to them. I have looked at two motivational theories, McGregor and Vroom.

Throughout every organization, there is a system set up for effective performance management. It is known that there is a continuous process associated with performance management. In order have success in the process; managers must have extensive knowledge of the mission and goals of the organization. Once the mission and goal is set in place, there should be a cascading effect that trickles down to each employee within the organization. This paper summarizes an article titled “Performance Management Done Right: It’s Not the Form, It’s the Process” (Murray, n.d.) The published article breaks down what performance management actually entails and introduces a variety of ways to implement the tool that helps build

Nowadays, organizations’ results are heavily dependent on employees’ work motivation: motivation is the key to achieve high levels of performance, it makes employees put effort into their work, be engaged and achieve results.

One of the most difficult aspects confronting management of most organization today is how to make their workers become efficient. The performance of organization members is jointly determined by Motivation that is the extent to which they are willing to perform well and by their ability that is the extent to which they possess the skills and abilities necessary to perform well. In this essay I will define and evaluate motivation theories and psychological strengths and discuss factors that underpin performance.

Motivation in the workplace has been a frequently discussed subject for at least a century. Whether an employee is doing paperwork behind a desk, helping to put together a car on a conveyor belt, or trying to make a sale, motivation is essential in their job. The reason behind this is simple enough- the more motivated an employee is the more work they tend to get done. However, it can be a struggle for managers to keep their workers motivated. This struggle has led to the development of numerous motivational theories, all aiming to help managers keep their employees motivation high. Among these theories, three stand out among the rest as the most relevant theories for the modern workplace- McClelland’s acquired needs theory, Locke’s and Latham’s goal setting theory, and Vroom’s expectancy theory.

Motivation can be a key-contributing factor in employee performance. It is of great importance to an organization to recognize ways in which it can use employee motivation to positively affect employee performance. The methods used by organizations to motivate its employees are essential in determining how they affect employee performance. There are both positive and negative motivational tools that may be explored. The purpose of this paper is to examine the relationship between motivation and employee performance.

Performances management structure are designed with the target of advance both, individual and organizational performance by recognize performance requirements, ensure regular feedback and help employees in their career development. The main goal of performance management is to ensure that the organization and employees work together to get best results. For example organization should help to employees in identifying the knowledge and ability required for performing the job efficiently as this would drive their focus towards performing the right task in the right way. Organization should help encourage employees personal growth and development in they career and help to get the desired skills and knowledge. The purpose of performance management is make employee feel motivate at work and make them understand about they investment in the organisation. Successfully reach the set target as well as it also focus on helping the employees to understand what is being require from them and how they could deliver it to the organisation.

Employee motivation is important for organizations to produce the desired results needed and function effectively. In this essay we review rewards and recognition, trust, and employee development, as motivational issues that are challenging Cummins Western Canada today. These challenges are affecting the environment, the performance, and the culture of the organization. Looking at some motivation theories, we will analyze the issues identified and provide some ideas for improvement to this challenge.

| Explanation of what approaches the manager could use to build cohesive, cooperative and effective teams

Nowadays it is widely accepted that the most important resource of any company are its employees; therefore competent manager need to have the clear understanding what motivates their subordinates to achieve effective performance as from efficiency of their work the success of the organization depends. Consequently, the task of manager consists in as much as possible effectively to use personnel opportunities. In independence on the manager decision the effect from it can be received only in case if this decision would successfully be embodied in the employees’ affairs. And it can occur only in case if workers are interested in results of the work. For this reason, it is necessary to motivate the person, to induce to action.