Introduction This report will look at the productivity gap between the UK and its international comparator nations. The productivity gap is the phrase used to describe the difference in productivity of two nations. The findings and recommendations of the Leitch Review of Skills 2006 will be discussed comprehensively, and used as a base for further analysis of the productivity gap. I will also explore the action Government and businesses can take to increase productivity. Overview of the Leitch Report In 2004, Lord Leitch was asked by the UK Government to compile a report detailing what should be done ‘in order to maximise economic prosperity, productivity and to improve social justice’ (Leitch, 2004). Leitch looked at British skills and …show more content…
Moreover, even if the 2006 targets aiming to improve skills were to be met we would still lag behind comparator nations. ‘There is a direct correlation between skills, productivity and employment’. He continues, ‘As a result of low skills, the UK risks increasing inequality, deprivation and child poverty, and risks a generation cut off permanently from labour market opportunity.’ (Leitch 2006:4). The report called for dramatic improvements, with the overall aim of making the UK a global skills leader by 2020. In order for this to be achieved attainment levels would have to be doubled almost completely across the board. These objectives include; increasing attainment of basic English and Maths skills to 95% in adults, increasing the percentage of adults with level 2 skills over 20%, from 69% in 2005 and increasing the number of adults with level 4 qualifications to 40% from 29% in 2005, with a commitment to continue improvements. (Level two skills involves holding five good GCSE’s. Level three skilled workers must hold at least two A levels. Level four skills equates to a degree or other vocational skills.) Productivity Gap The productivity gap is defined as ‘the ratio between the productivity of a benchmark country (such as the United States) and that of a less developed economy.’ Productivity is a key economic indicator and thus such a long-term short
The Australian Government’s Productivity Commission (PC) highlights the importance of schools to minimise disadvantage in schools. It is crucial for schools to adapt teaching and learning programs that respond to the individual needs of students by recognising and addressing underachievement. In addition to quality tailored programs, quality teaching by highly trained staff is also quality learning. (PC, 12)
There are far too many issues that the human race will have to deal within the upcoming years, and even now. In “Martin’s 17 great challenges” some of these issues are furthered explained. Although, this paper is only focusing on one and that is Bridging the Skill and Wisdom Gap. As the great author himself, James Martin, said “Society 's best brains are saturated with immediate issues that become ever more complex, rather than reflecting on why we are doing this and what the long-term consequences will be.” Therefore, Bridging the Skill and Wisdom Gap will be an issue for the near future because it will lead to less creativity in the job industry and less knowledge about life itself, but we can solve this by focusing on your best skill,
In December 2006 the Leitch Review published its final report Prosperity for all in the global economy– world class skills. It set out the challenging ambition to become a world leader in skills by 2020. The target requires doubling attainment across most levels of qualifications. The Government has welcomed this ambition and is currently investing heavily in improving."
In addition, Shipler points out that a lack of quality education is just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to the necessary social and mechanical skills necessary to realistically prepare them for employment (Shipler, 2004).
Liberals believe that education should be seen as a form of empowerment rather than as something that is done to the learner, and be regarded as an on going entitlement, with access not restricted by age. They believe that the introduction of management training programmes for teachers and governors, sourced at local level to enable schools to choose courses appropriate to their particular needs is an important step to provide education for all levels. To increase post-secondary level education, the restoration of student grants to a basic “living wage” level, more access courses for those who lack the standard entry qualifications, and a two year training allowance and entitlement should accompany young people entering employment at the age of 16, 17 or 18 years in order to help increase education as well as accommodate the needs of
| Basic skills in numbers.Basic skills in writing & literacy.Learning to read.Learning diagraphs and some trigraphs at this stage.Basic use of ICT for enjoyment, learning, interaction and development.
Kushell, E., Michael A, Heide D and Bosserman N, in their article explain that “Kerr’s words help explain today’s disappointing competitive results.” They further explain that most organisations continue to reward less productive behaviour, using the example of getting a job done being more important that how the job gets done at the expense of long term gains in productivity.
Youth unemployment has been a constant problem in Australia for decades. In Treasurer Scott Morrison and the Coalition’s 2016-17 budget, a new plan focusing on helping young people join the workforce aims to drastically lower the youth unemployment rate over the next few years: the ‘Youth Jobs PaTH Program’. The $752 million dollar program aims to help up to 120,000 vulnerable young people over the next four years (Budget 2016-17, Queensland Government). However, there is a concern how effective the scheme will be, due to its emphasis on purely internships. Many argue that the Coalition’s youth unemployment scheme ‘Working Futures’ is a better option to lower youth unemployment, for its alternative structure and focus. To decide which one is best for Australia, both the Coalition and Labor Party’s scheme will be judged by analysing their social impacts upon the Australian youth.
These improved efficiencies support profitability and overall business growth, which spur recruitment demands. In the United Kingdom alone, manufacturing output growth is projected to average around 2.5% per annum, with particular growth in R&D-related industries, such as parts of chemicals and engineering.
Amazingly, productivity rapidly raised in the first 24 hours. The study concluded that for maximum productivity, the best worker had to be chosen to perform that task and had to be provided with training for efficient work. Every worker and his output had to be closely monitored and he had to be rewarded for greater productivity. Taylor also wanted to reduce conflicts between managers and workers by convincing them that they would benefit mutually from a rise in productivity, as this would favour society and the organisation as a whole.
“ Human capital is what makes individuals productive, and productivity is what determines our standard of living.”(Wheelan, 130). By investing in human capital, we are able to have more skilled workers who are productive and positively affect the economy because we make more contribution and therefore will get more in return.
Kaiser & Kaplan's (2013) article presented a very empty and lackluster argument in attempt to forgo people skills in the name of progress and advancement. Although this less than convincing work establishes little towards its hypothesis, some useful dialogue can be produced from such a work as learning can sometimes come through disagreement and debate. The purpose of this essay is to review this article and give a summation about its contents and arguments.
George Bernard Shaw, a nobel Prize for Literature in 1925 once said, “If all the economists were laid end to end, they would not reach a conclusion” (Mankiw, 1998: 34). Yet, an economic comparison between the United Kingdom and the United States could still be made to distinguish the country with the better economic growth performance. Important indicators when comparing economies is economic growth rate, which is a measure of the yearly rate of development rate of GDP using the market prices (Ros, 2013: 26). Another indicator is the GDP, which is defined as the total amount of goods and services produced in a country per year (Mankiw, 2009: 521). Also, the inflation rate is used, which is a continuos increase in the prices for goods and services in the consumer price index and it is measured yearly (Herr & Kazandziska, 2011: 74). Lastly, the unemployment rate shows the percentage of people whiling and could work but do not have a job (Macdonald, 1999: 238). This report will compare the economic growth performance of the United States and the United Kingdom since 1990 using four indicators: economic growth rate, GDP, inflation, and unemployment rate.
In the face of intensified global competition and liberalised trade, productivity has emerged as a key indicator of successful restructuring and upgrading by firms and industries. Traditionally, productivity growth has been regarded as one of the main sources of income growth, along with the factors such as capital accumulation and the deepening of human capital development. Over the past two decades, liberalisation has become an important part of many countries' development strategies. The present study analyses the review of earlier studies on productivity
The education sector plays a pivotal role in supplying trained and credentialed candidates to the global labour market. This role will amplify in importance as the demand for medium to high skill workers rises.